| Date |
Text |
| 2019-06-07 14:18:10 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON THE PLAN SHEETS IS |
| | INSUFFICIENT TO REVIEW FOR FIRE CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | PURPOSES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS NO SCOPE OF WORK SUBMITTED FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 1 |
| | |
| | 1.7.12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | 1.7.12.1 THE AHJ SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE |
| | PLANS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE |
| | CODES AND |
| | STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 1.14.1 WHERE REQUIRED BY THE AHJ FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, |
| | MODIFICATION, OR REHABILITATION, |
| | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND A |
| | PPROVED PRIOR TO THE START OF SUCH WORK AS PROVIDED IN |
| | SECTION 1.14. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDING WHAT |
| | IS TO BE DEMOED AND NEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF ANY FIRE ALARM OR FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER PROTECTION INDICATED OR AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | 1.14.2 THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE |
| | THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDE ALL OF THE FIRE |
| | PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | (2) THE SHOP DRAWINGS ARE CORRECT AND IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. |
| | (3) THE CONTRACTOR MAINTAINS AN APPROVED SET OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF ANY EXISTING SYSTEMS AND AN |
| | APPLICABLE NOTE THAT ANY WORK ON THE FA OR FS SYSTEMS |
| | SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
