| Date |
Text |
| 2019-09-12 17:18:49 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | |
| | -ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- OK |
| | |
| | 2- REVISE INFORMATION ON SHEET A-1: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS AND PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | PROPERTY APPRAISER THESE BUILDINGS WERE BUILT IN 1925 |
| | AND THEIR CONSTRUCTION WAS WOOD FRAME. DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | STATES CONSTRUCTION TYPE IIIB. THIS IS INCORRECT. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 602.1 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED CONSTRUCTION TYPE IS INCORRECT AGAIN. WOOD |
| | FRAMED BUILDINGS ARE NOT TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION. |
| | ENGINEER TO SEE SEC. 602.2 FBCBUILDING FOR CONSTRUCTION |
| | TYPE II REQUIREMENTS. FBC-BUILDING. THIS BUILDING FALLS |
| | MORE INTO THE TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | C) OK |
| | |
| | 3- GUEST HOUSE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A-2: |
| | A)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) THIS IS A WOOD FRAMED BUILDING NOT CONCRETE BLOCK. |
| | SEE ITEM #2(A) ABOVE. REVISE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN, PARTITION ASSEMBLY LEGEND AND |
| | RESPECTIVE LEGEND AND KEY NOTES ON SHEET A-2. AND, |
| | PROVIDE WOOD FRAMING REINFORCEMENT |
| | DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS AT EXTERIOR DOORS OPENINGS IF |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1) THE LEGEND FOR THE PARTITION ASSEMBLY LEGEND IS NOT |
| | CLEAR. WHAT IS AN 8" WOOD WALL MASONRY UNIT SPECIFIED |
| | ON LEGEND NOTE #1?. IT LOOKS LIKE THE ENGINEER IS |
| | MISMATCHING WOOD FRAMED CONSTRUCTION AND MASONRY |
| | CONSTRUCTION. CLARIFY./REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (2) THE MINIMUM STUCCO THICKNESS IS 7/8" NOT 3/4". SEE |
| | TABLE R702.1(1) FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (3) PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW INSTALLING THE 1"X2" |
| | PRESSURE TREATED FURRING STRIPS SPECIFIED ON LEGEND |
| | NOTE #3. THIS TYPE CONSTRUCTION IS USUALLY SPECIFIED ON |
| | MASONRY CONSTRUCTION. IF ENGINEER WANTS TO USE THIS |
| | FURRING STRIPS, THEN PROVIDE THE REQUESTED DETAIL. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (4)PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW INSTALLING THE FOIL |
| | INSULATION R-4 ON THE FRAMED WALL AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | LEGEND NOTE #4. THIS TYPE OF INSULATION IS USUALLY |
| | SPECIFIED ON MASONRY CONSTRUCTION. IF ENGINEER WANTS TO |
| | USE THIS INSULATION , THEN PROVIDE THE REQUESTED |
| | DETAIL. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (5) WALL TYPE #1 SHOWS 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD ON BOTH SIDES |
| | OF WALL. THIS IS AN EXTERIOR WALL. THIS SEEMS TO BE |
| | INCORRECT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (6) FIRE RATED WALL #3 IS INCORRECT. WALL TYPE #3 SHOWN |
| | DOESN'T CORRESPOND TO UL-425. UL 425 ASSEMBLY IS FOR |
| | WALL WITH METAL STUDS NOT WOOD FRAME. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. PROVIDE ASSEMBLY DETAILS THAT MATCHES |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | C) OK |
| | |
| | D)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E) BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE THE |
| | SOUTH WALL NEEDS TO BE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL AS |
| | REQUIRED BY TABLE R302.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE HOUR FIRE |
| | RATED WALL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE PARTITION ASSEMBLY #3. ONE HOUR FIRE RATED UL |
| | ASSEMBLY 425 SPECIFIED ON SHEET A-2 IS FOR METAL STUDS |
| | PARTITION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM |
| | #B(6) ABOVE. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | F) OK. |
| | |
| | G)OK |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET S-1: |
| | A) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)NEW COVERED TERRACE ROOFING MATERIAL IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | SECTION A ON SHEET S-1 SPECIFIES MODIFIED BITUMEN, |
| | WHILE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A-3 SHOW SOME KIND |
| | OF ROOF TILE. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE |
| | ARE LIMITATIONS ON THE MINIMUM ROOF SLOPE AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R905.3.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1) SECTION "A" WAS REVISED. IT CALLS FOR CEMENT TILE. |
| | SLOPE OF DECK NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 905.3.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SECTION A SPECIFIES 1" SLOPE. CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY THE SLOPE OF THE DECK IN DEGREES, GRADIENT OR |
| | PERCENT. IT LOOKS LIKE THE CONCRETE TILE MAY NOT BE |
| | INSTALLED AS PROPOSED. SEE FRSA/TRI CONCRETE AND CLAY |
| | TILE INSTALLATION MANUAL AND CONCRETE TILE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR MINIMUM SLOPE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | NOTE: THIS STRUCTURE IS A CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC HOUSE. |
| | UNFORTUNATELY THIS WAS NO PROPERLY FLAGGED IN THE CITY |
| | SYSTEM. THAT'S WHY THIS ISSUE WAS NOT ADDRESSED ON THE |
| | FIRST REVIEW. ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR |
| | CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC BUILDINGS. BUT IF OWNER WANTS TO |
| | SUBMIT THEM, THEN THEY NEED TO BE COMPLETE AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)THE ENERGY FORM R405-2017 IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED |
| | AT THE BOTTOM BY THE OWNER OR THE OWNER LEGALLY |
| | DESIGNATED AGENT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ONLY ONE COPY WAS SIGNED. NEED TO SIGN BOTH COPIES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) CALCULATIONS HAVE A COPY OF A DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| | THIS IS NOT A DIGITAL SUBMITTAL. CALCULATIONS NEED TO |
| | HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AND INFORMATION OF |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.003 |
| | FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING |
| | PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER DIDN'T PROVIDE HIS INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 471 F.S. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM, INCLUDING THE OWNER'S NAME, BUILDER'S NAME, |
| | PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- |
| | ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | STILL MISSING INFORMATION. NEED THE BUILDER'S NAME AND |
| | PERMIT OFFICE. |
| | |
| | D) OK |
| | |
| | E) OK |
| | |
| | F)OK |
| | |
| | G)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | H)REVISE TYPE OF ROOF AND ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON |
| | PAGE 2 OF 4 TO MATCH PLANS. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ROOF MATERIAL IS INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | I)OK |
| | |
| | J)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | K)REVISE WINDOWS ORIENTATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 4. THE |
| | ORIENTATION OF THE WINDOWS DON'T MATCH PLANS (NOTE: |
| | PLANS ARE DRAWN WITH THE NORTH ARROW FACING DOWN. KEEP |
| | THIS IN MIND WHEN REVISING THE CALCULATIONS). SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THERE ARE NO OPENINGS ON THE EAST SIDE. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | L) OK |
| | |
| | M)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | N)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | BUILDER (OWNER/BUILDER) DIDN'T COMPLETE THE EPL DISPLAY |
| | CARD. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| | SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. |
| | |
| | 6- OK. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR ROOFING AT NEW COVERED TERRACE. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #4(B) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)IF FLAT ROOF, THEN PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) FOR FLAT ROOF AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 AND CLEARLY MARK WHICH |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T |
| | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. |
| | BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)IF TILE ROOF, THEN PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: |
| | - ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING IN |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. SEC. 107.2.1.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE ADHESIVE, THEN |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL. IF SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN |
| | SPECIFY SCREW SIZE AND NUMBER OF SCREWS. |
| | -ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND CLEARLY MARK ROOF TILE |
| | FASTENING METHOD AS REQUIRED BY CITY POLICY FOR ALL |
| | ROOFING PERMITS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER NEEDS TO PROVIDE THE ROOF TILE FASTENING |
| | METHOD. IF USING SCREWS, THEN NEED TO SPECIFY SIZE AND |
| | NUMBER OF SCREWS. |
| | |
| | 8- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- OWNER/BUILDER NEEDS TO COMPLETE ROOFING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION ALSO. SEC/ 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NEED THE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS BEFORE ISSUING THE |
| | ROOFING SUB-PERMIT. ROOFING PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | ON HOLD UNTIL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND |
| | REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. PLEASE |
| | DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU |
| | HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |