| Date |
Text |
| 2019-05-14 17:45:45 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF, FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- ACCORDING TO PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, |
| | THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE IS $319,214. THEREFORE, |
| | NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH THE ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 706.8 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE. NOTE: A SEPARATE SUB-PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR |
| | ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS. THIS WORK CAN NOT BE DONE BY |
| | THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR UNLESS ROOFING CONTRACTOR |
| | POSSESSES THE PROPER LICENSE TO PERFORM THIS WORK. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SAME PROPOSAL FROM MERCURIO CONSTRUCTION LLC THAT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WAS RE-SUBMITTED |
| | AGAIN. THIS PROPOSAL WAS NOT APPROVED ON THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. THE COST OF THE ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS |
| | PROPOSAL WAS TOO GENERAL AND WAS FOR THE ENTIRE HOUSE. |
| | THE 15% EXCEPTION DOESN'T APPLY TO THE ROOF TO WALL |
| | CONNECTIONS AT ENTIRE HOUSE. IT APPLIES ONLY IF THE |
| | COST TO INSTALL THE ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS AT ALL |
| | CORNERS EXCEEDS THE 15% OF THE ROOF WORK. THE ROOF TO |
| | WALL CONNECTIONS READS "ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL |
| | NOT BE REQUIRED UNLESS EVALUATION AND INSTALLATION OF |
| | CONNECTIONS AT GABLE ENDS OR ALL CORNERS CAN BE |
| | COMPLETED FOR 15 PERCENT OF THE COST OF ROOF |
| | REPLACEMENT.". THAT IS WHY I ASKED FOR A BREAKDOWN OF |
| | THE ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS. COST TO DO ALL CORNERS |
| | AND COST TO DO THE REST OF THE HOUSE. NEED TO SPECIFY |
| | HOW MANY CORNERS ARE IN THIS HOUSE AND NEED TO CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY TYPE OF STRAP TO BE USED. ALSO, NUMBER OF |
| | NAILS NEED TO BE REVISED AS WELL. SEE COPY OF PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT BELOW. |
| | |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING ARE THE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | DAVE WIKEL- PRESIDENT OF THERMA SEAL ROOF SYSTEMS, LLC |
| | E-MAILED STATING THAT THE COST OF ROOF TO WALL |
| | CONNECTIONS EXCEEDS THE 15% OF THE ROOF WORK. |
| | PROPOSAL FROM MERCURIO CONSTRUCTION LLC SUBMITTED IS |
| | TOO GENERAL. ITEM #1 OF THE PROPOSAL STATES "REMOVE THE |
| | T AND G DECKING AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE EXISTING |
| | HOUSE". PROVIDE PROPOSAL WITH COMPLETE BREAKDOWN OF THE |
| | ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS. PROVIDE COST FOR ROOF TO WALL |
| | CONNECTIONS AT ALL CORNER AND ROOF TO WALL CONNECTION |
| | AT THE REST OF THE HOUSE. CLEARLY STATE HOW MANY |
| | CORNERS ARE IN THIS HOUSE. AND, CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE OF |
| | STRAP AND NUMBER OF NAILS. |
| | ( 3 NAILS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. SEE SEC. 706.8.1.5 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING). |
| | NOTE: IF THE COST TO INSTALL ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS |
| | AT ALL CORNERS EXCEEDS THE 15% OF THE ROOF WORK, THEN |
| | THE EXCEPTION APPLIES. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTION #2 OF SEC. 706.8.1 OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING |
| | STATES THE FOLLOWING: |
| | "ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED UNLESS |
| | EVALUATION AND INSTALLATION OF CONNECTIONS AT GABLE |
| | ENDS OR ALL CORNERS CAN BE COMPLETED FOR 15 PERCENT OF |
| | THE COST OF ROOF REPLACEMENT.". |
| | |
| | |
| | 2- OK. |
| | |
| | 3- OK |
| | |
| | 4- OK |
| | |
| | 5-- OK. |
| | |
| | 6- OK |
| | |
| | 7- OK |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
