| Date |
Text |
| 2020-09-09 16:50:09 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 05.28.2020 |
| | PERMIT NO.: 19040938 |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. [ SATISFIED ] - SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1) SHOULD SHOW |
| | THE FINISHED PRODUCT. DEMOLITION CAN BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | DEMOLITION PLAN. THE SITE PLAN DENOTES A DETAIL FOR THE |
| | AREA OF THE NEW HANDICAP RAMP AS BEING DETAIL #3 ON |
| | SHEET D-1, WHICH IS CORRECT, BUT A DETAIL #1 ON SHEET |
| | SP-1 ALSO PERTAINS TO THIS AREA. |
| | |
| | 1.1 [ SATISFIED ] - SITE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE PROPOSED |
| | HANDICAP RAMP. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE |
| | SETBACK BETWEEN THE RAMP AND ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES. |
| | PROVIDED THAT THE RAMP IS LESS THAN 3 FEET ABOVE GRADE, |
| | IT MAY PROJECT TO A POINT NO CLOSER THAN 2 FEET TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. IF THE RAMP IS IN EXCESS OF 3 FEET, IT |
| | SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | THE MAIN BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ONLY ONE SITE PLAN SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. THERE ARE TWO SHEETS THAT ARE BOTH LABELSED |
| | SHEET SP-1 AND SHOW DIFFERENT ELEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1.3 [ NEW COMMENT ] - SHEET SP-1 PREPARED BY SCHMIDT |
| | NICHOLS IS NOT THE CURRENT PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND DOES |
| | NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE SCOPE OF WORK THAT IS BEING |
| | PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - A CURRENT AND ACCURATE |
| | SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE SHEET FROM COMPASS SURVEYING |
| | IS SHOWING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE IMPROVEMENTS |
| | SHOWN THEREON DO NOT MATCH THE CURRENT PROPOSED SITE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441 |
| | OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | (ZLDRS), BECAUSE THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK EXCEEDS 50 |
| | PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, THE |
| | SITE SHALL BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV |
| | (LANDSCAPING) OF THE ZLDRS, INCLUDING THE EXISTING |
| | PARKING LOT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED INDICATING SUCH. |
| | IF EXISTING MATERIAL IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND ALL |
| | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV HAVE BEEN MET, THEN NO |
| | ADDITIONAL PERMIT/INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED. IF THE |
| | EXISTING MATERIAL ON SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO ALL OF |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, THEN ADDITIONAL |
| | MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND |
| | PERMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT PLANS SHOULD INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 3.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED STRUCTURES, IMPROVEMENTS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 3.2. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED TREES, SHRUBS, GROUND COVERS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 3.3. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LOCATION OF UTILITY AND |
| | DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, OVERHEAD LINES, WATER METERS, |
| | TRANSFORMERS, CHECK VALVES, CLEAN OUTS, FIRE HYDRANTS, |
| | LIGHT POLES, ETC. THAT MAY IMPACT LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 3.4. [ SATISFIED ] - TABULATION TABLE INDICATING HOW |
| | THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL COMPLIES WITH |
| | ARTICLE XIV. |
| | |
| | 3.5. [ SATISFIED ] - SPECIES, QUANTITY, HEIGHT, SPREAD, |
| | SPACING, AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | PLANT MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 3.6. [ SATISFIED ] - STATEMENT THAT ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS |
| | WILL BE PROVIDED WITH A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION |
| | SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY (PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT ANY NEW IRRIGATION SHALL BE DONE UNDER A |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT). |
| | |
| | 3.7 [ NEW COMMENT ] - LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOULD NOT BE |
| | INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AS THEY |
| | HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AS A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 4. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - A/C UNITS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN (THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PREPARED BY |
| | SCHMIDT NICHOLS, BUT NOT DKK) AND SHALL NOT ENCROACH |
| | MORE THAN FOUR (4) FEET INTO THE REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK. |
| | ARE THERE EXISTING A/C UNITS IN THAT LOCATION? |
| | |
| | 4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - DIMENSIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED TO |
| | INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE MAXIMUM FOUR (4) FOOT |
| | ENCROACHMENT. |
| | |
| | 5. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/SECTION OF |
| | THE WINDOW INSTALLATION. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) |
| | OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS, WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE |
| | FACADE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
