| Date |
Text |
| 2019-06-10 09:57:48 | SECOND BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | PLANS THAT WERE REVIEWED THE FIRST TIME WERE NOT |
| | RE-SUBMITTED. THIS MAKES THE REVIEW MORE DIFFICULT |
| | BECAUSE THERE IS NO REFERENCE OF WHAT WAS REVIEWED. IN |
| | THE FUTURE PLEASE SUBMIT THE PLANS THAT WERE REVIEWED |
| | TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2) THE COVERSHEET UNDER THE HEADING OCCUPANCY LOADS |
| | STATES THE CUSTOMER AREA AS BASED ON STANDING |
| | UNCONCENTRATED TABLES AND CHAIRS @ 15 SQ. FT. PER |
| | OCCUPANT. PLEASE REVIEW THE 2017 FBC-B |
| | TABLE 1004.1.2. |
| | ASSEMBLY WITHOUT FIXED SEATS |
| | CONCENTRATED (CHAIRS ONLY- NOT FIXED 7 NET |
| | STANDING SPACE 5 NET |
| | UNCONCENTRATED (TABLES & CHAIRS) 15 NET |
| | |
| | YOU NEED TO DECIDE IF YOU ARE TAKING THE SQUARE FEET AT |
| | STANDING 441/5= 89 OCCUPANTS REQUIRING 2 EXITS. |
| | OR |
| | IF YOU ARE TAKING THE UNCONCENTRATED (TABLES & CHAIRS) |
| | @ 15 NET. 441/15=30 OCCUPANTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSEE: |
| | REVISED CALCULATIONS SHOW 10 PEOPLE AS THE TOTAL NUMBER |
| | OF PEOPLE. THIS IS INCORRECT. THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS |
| | BASED ON THE ACTUAL FUNCTION OF EACH SPACE AS REQUIRED |
| | BY TABLE 1004.1.2 FBC-BUILDING. PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD OF EACH ROOM OR AREA AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 1004.1.1.1 FBC-BUILDING, THEN ADD THEM UP AND PROVIDE |
| | THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| | NOTE: THE BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION IS JUST FOR THE |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION SINCE THIS IS AN SMALL |
| | ASSEMBLY GROUP WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF LESS THAN 50 |
| | PEOPLE. OCCUPANT LOAD IS ALWAYS CALCULATED USING TABLE |
| | 1004.1.2. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3) PLEASE NOTE ON THE COVER SHEET THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD HAS THE NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED AS 1 BUT 2 |
| | PROVIDED AND THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 27 FEET 6 |
| | INCHES. IF THE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS GOING TO BE TAKEN |
| | FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE FLOOR REQUIRING THE 2 EXITS, |
| | THEN SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH: |
| | 2017 ACCESS. CODE 206.4.1 PUBLIC ENTRANCES. IN ADDITION |
| | TO ENTRANCES REQUIRED BY 206.4.2 THROUGH 206.4.9, AT |
| | LEAST 60 PERCENT OF ALL PUBLIC ENTRANCES SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH 404. |
| | |
| | 2017 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 207.1 MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1003.2.13 OF THE |
| | INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (2000 EDITION AND 2001 |
| | SUPPLEMENT) OR SECTION 1007 OF THE INTERNATIONAL |
| | BUILDING CODE (2003 EDITION). |
| | |
| | 2003 IBC-B 1007.1 WHERE MORE THAN ONE MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | IS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 1014.1 OR 1018.1 FROM ANY |
| | ACCESSIBLE SPACE, EACH ACCESSIBLE PORTION OF THE SPACE |
| | SHALL BE SERVED BY NOT LESS THAN TWO MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | THERE IS AT LEAST A 6 INCH DROP OUT THE BACK DOOR TO |
| | THE COURTYARD DECK MAKING IT NOT ABLE TO BE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)THE MEASUREMENT OF THE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS TAKEN FROM |
| | THE MOST REMOTE POINT TO THE ENTRANCE TO AN EXIT. SEE |
| | SEC. 1017.3 FBC-BUILDING. LIFE SAFETY PLAN ON SHEET A-1 |
| | SHOWS THE DISTANCE FROM THE REAR DOOR TO THE ENTRY |
| | DOOR. CLARIFY WHY MEASURING THE DISTANCE FROM ONE DOOR |
| | TO THE OTHER. IT LOOKS LIKE THE MOST REMOTE POINT WOULD |
| | BE THE FREEZER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE THE EGRESS WIDTH INFORMATION SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | CVR: |
| | (1)REVISE THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS. SEE RESPONSE TO |
| | COMMENT #2 ABOVE AND REVISE THE EGRESS WIDTH PROVIDED. |
| | 36" PROVIDED IS INCORRECT. THE WIDTH PROVIDED IS THE |
| | CLEAR WIDTH OPENING NOT THE SIZE OF THE DOOR. SEE SEC. |
| | 1010.1.1 FBC-BUILDING FOR PROPER WAY OF DIMENSIONING |
| | THE CLEAR WIDTH AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. TYPICALLY A 36" |
| | DOOR WOULD PROVIDE 32" CLEAR WIDTH OPENING. NOTE: |
| | PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING DOORS. DORO SCHEDULE |
| | DOESN'T SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING DOORS. THIS |
| | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (1)THERE IS NOT TABLE 1005.1 IN TH FBC-BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) OK. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT " THE |
| | TENANT DOES NOT INTEND TO USE THE COURTYARD FOR |
| | SEASONAL SEATING". |
| | |
| | 4A) OK. |
| | |
| | 4B) OK. |
| | |
| | 4C) OK. |
| | |
| | 4D)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4D)(1) 902.2 CLEAR FLOOR OR GROUND SPACE. A CLEAR FLOOR |
| | SPACE COMPLYING WITH 305 POSITIONED FOR A FORWARD |
| | APPROACH SHALL BE PROVIDED. KNEE AND TOE CLEARANCE |
| | COMPLYING WITH 306 SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | KNEE AND TOE CLEARANCES WERE NOT PROVIDED. THERE ARE NO |
| | DETAILS FOR FRONT COUNTER AND PICK UP COUNTER BY THE |
| | PREP/SERV AREA. |
| | ALSO, CLARIFY WHERE DOES RECEPTION COUNTER ADA DETAIL |
| | 5/A-2 APPLIES TO?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4D)(2) 902.3 HEIGHT. THE TOPS OF DINING SURFACES AND |
| | WORK SURFACES SHALL BE 28 INCHES MINIMUM AND 34 INCHES |
| | MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR OR GROUND. |
| | |
| | RESPONS: |
| | THE HEIGHT OF THE PICK UP COUNTER DOESN'T COMPLY. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, CLARIFY WHERE DOES RECEPTION COUNTER ADA DETAIL |
| | 5/A-2 APPLIES TO?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5) THE VALUE FOR THIS PERMIT IS EXTREMELY LOW |
| | CONSIDERING ALL OF THE KITCHEN EQUIPMENT THAT IS GOING |
| | INTO THIS SPACE AND THE REQUIRED GREASE TRAP. 109.3* |
| | BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. |
| | IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE |
| | CLAIMED VALUATION OF BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, |
| | ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS |
| | APPEARS TO BE UNDER ESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE |
| | PERMIT SHALL BE DENIED. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, |
| | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL |
| | REPLACEMENT PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND |
| | SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE |
| | STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR |
| | FINISHES, NORMAL SITE WORK (EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR |
| | BUILDINGS), ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING |
| | COST, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. |
| | VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED |
| | DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| | (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.) WITH REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS |
| | FOR LOCATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| | CONGRESS. |
| | |
| | THIS MAIN BUILDING PERMIT WILL INCLUDE THE FEES FOR THE |
| | MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING & ROOFING PERMITS. |
| | WHEN THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR COMES IN FOR A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED PERMIT APPLICATION FORM BY THE |
| | QUALIFIER AND OWNER AND BRINGS IN THE LISTED |
| | SUB-PERMITS M-E-P & ROOFING PERMITS SIGNED BY THE |
| | QUALIFIER OF EACH COMPANY, THEIR INSURANCES AND |
| | LICENSURE UP TO DATE, THE M-E-P AND ROOFING PERMITS ARE |
| | FREE OF CHARGE. IF THE M-E-P & ROOFING PERMITS COME IN |
| | LATER THERE WILL BE AN $80.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR |
| | EACH PERMIT. |
| | |
| | ALL OTHER PERMITS FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM, RACK |
| | STORAGE, EXHAUST HOODS, ANSUL SYSTEMS OR ALTERNATIVE |
| | AUTOMATIC FIRE-EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS, WALK IN COOLERS & |
| | FREEZERS, ALL LOW VOLTAGE PERMITS, GENERATORS & FUEL |
| | TANKS, GAS PERMIT, POOL, JACUZZI AND ASSOCIATED |
| | SUB-PERMITS, AWNING, SCREEN ENCLOSURES, CANOPY, FENCE, |
| | LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AUGER CAST PILE AND OR |
| | FOUNDATION OR STRUCTURE ONLY PERMIT WILL BE SEPARATE |
| | REVIEWS AND ASSOCIATED FEES WITH EACH PERMIT. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN ITEMIZED LIST AND SUBTRACT THESE LINE |
| | ITEMS AND THEIR VALUE FROM THE OVERALL BUILDING VALUE |
| | STATED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THIS PROJECT. THE |
| | REMAINING BALANCE WILL BE AFFECTIVELY THE VALUE OF THE |
| | BUILDING YOU WILL BE PAYING FOR THIS PERMIT. THE |
| | BUILDING DEPARTMENT DOES NOT WANT TO COLLECT TWICE FOR |
| | THE VALUE OF THESE SUB-PERMITS NOT COVERED UNDER THE |
| | PRIME OR MASTER PERMIT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE ITEMIZED LIST REQUESTED BY THE |
| | PREVIOUS PLANS EXAMINER. INLCUDE THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE EXISTING |
| | RESTROOM TO SEE IF THE RESTROOM COMPLIES WITH THE 2017 |
| | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE? 107.2.1.2 ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE RESTROOM |
| | DESIGN HAS BEEN REVISED TO CONFORM TO THE 2017 |
| | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE". |
| | FLOOR PLANS WERE REVISED BUT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT WALLS |
| | ARE NEW AND WHAT WALLS ARE EXISTING. PLEASE COORDINATE |
| | WITH THE WALL PLAN LEGEND AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY TO |
| | AVOID CONFUSION. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8) SHEET A-1 SHOWS UNDER THE STAIR STORAGE. PLEASE SHOW |
| | HOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2017 FBC-B SECTION |
| | 1011.7.3 ENCLOSURES UNDER INTERIOR STAIRWAYS. THE WALLS |
| | AND SOFFITS WITHIN ENCLOSED USABLE SPACES UNDER |
| | ENCLOSED AND UNENCLOSED STAIRWAYS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY |
| | 1-HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CONSTRUCTION OR THE |
| | FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING OF THE STAIRWAY ENCLOSURE, |
| | WHICHEVER IS GREATER. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET A-1 DOESN'T SEEM TO APPLY TO |
| | THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. PROVIDE DETAIL THAT MATCHES |
| | EXISTING CONDITIONS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. (PLEASE |
| | DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO RESUBMITTED PACKAGE). A |
| | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT |
| | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, |
| | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE |
| | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 10- A NEW CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. |
| | SEC. 1001.2 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
