| Date |
Text |
| 2019-11-08 16:55:11 | NEW AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTICE: *************** 4X FEE / NOTICE!!!!! |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) ****************** |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET 002-G-101 THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1A) 3RD REQUEST. UNDER THE HEADING BUILDING CODE |
| | SUMMARY THE PROPOSED USE IS LISTED AS BUSINESS (B) AND |
| | STORAGE (S1). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SERVICE SHOP IS |
| | LISTED AS A S1 OCCUPANCY. FOR MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR |
| | GARAGES COMPLYING WITH THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITIES |
| | OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS LISTED IN TABLE 307.1(1). |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT A LIST OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND |
| | ALLOWABLE QUANTITIES PER THE 2017 FBC-B TABLE 307.1(1). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE SAME RESPONSE THAT WAS PROVIDED ON THE PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT WAS PROVIDED THIS TIME AGAIN. THE ONLY |
| | DIFFERENCE IS THAT THE NOTE "G-101 NOTE ADDED (CLOUD |
| | 3)" WAS ADDED. |
| | THIS DOESN'T ANSWER THE REQUEST FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWER. THE REQUEST IS TO PROVIDE THE LIST AND |
| | QUANTITIES OF EACH HAZARDOUS MATERIALS THAT ARE GOING |
| | TO BE STORED IN THIS PLACE. ALSO, CLEARLY SHOW ON PLANS |
| | LOCATION OF EACH MATERIAL. ARCHITECT MAY WANT TO |
| | COORDINATE THIS INFORMATION WITH THE OWNER OF THE |
| | DEALERSHIP TO VERIFY QUANTITIES OF EACH MATERIAL TO BE |
| | STORED IN THIS PLACE AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON |
| | DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1B) OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1C) SEMI-COMPLIED. UNDER THE BUILDING DATA THERE IS NO |
| | LISTING FOR THE REQUIRED AREA OF REFUGE, THIS IS A 2 |
| | STORY BUILDING AND NO FIRE SPRINKLERS. THE 2017 |
| | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE UNDER SECTION 207 ACCESSIBLE |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS. SECTION 207.1. MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH SECTION 1007 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING |
| | CODE (2003 EDITION). |
| | PLEASE REVIEW IN THE 2003 IBC-B SECTIONS DEALING WITH: |
| | |
| | 1007.3 ENCLOSED EXIT STAIRWAYS, 48 INCHES BETWEEN |
| | HANDRAILS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OK. DIMENSIONS ON PLANS WERE REVISED, BUT INFORMATION |
| | ON SHEET G101 WAS NOT REVISED. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | MATCH. |
| | |
| | 1007.4 ELEVATORS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OK. NO USED AS MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 1007.6 AREAS OF REFUGE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OK. BUT, CLEARLY IDENTITY ON PLANS "AREA OF REFUGE AND |
| | SPECIFY SIZE. |
| | |
| | 1007.6.1. SIZE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CLEARLY IDENTITY ON PLANS "AREA OF REFUGE AND SPECIFY |
| | SIZE. |
| | |
| | 1007.6.2. SEPARATION. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OK. NO REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 1007.6.3. TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OK. BUT NEED TO CLEARLY SPECIFY IT ON PLANS. AND, TWO |
| | WAY COMMUNICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE BOTH AUDIBLE AND |
| | VISIBLE SIGNALS. |
| | |
| | 1007.6.4. INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY ON PLANS REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | |
| | 1007.6.5. IDENTIFICATION. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CLEARLY PROVIDE ON PLANS THE IDENTIFICATION |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 1007.7.7. SIGNAGE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY ON PLANS SIGNAGE THAT ELEVATOR IS NOT |
| | AN APPROVED ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS AND INDICATE |
| | LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1D) 3RD REQUEST. SEPARATED MIXED OCCUPANCY SHOWS THE |
| | FORMULA FOR AREA CALCULATIONS BUT HAS LEFT THE |
| | CALCULATION BLANK. PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACTUAL AND |
| | ALLOWABLE SQUARE FEET FOR EACH OF THE OCCUPANCIES AND |
| | THE END CALCULATION. 2017 FBC-B 508.3.3. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OCCUPANCIES LISTED ON SHEET G-101 (A AND M OCCUPANCIES) |
| | DON'T CORRESPOND TO THE OCCUPANCIES LISTED UNDER |
| | "ALLOWABLE AREA" (B AND S-1 OCCUPANCIES). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1E) SEMI-COMPLIED. PLEASE NOTE THE PLANS DOES NOT STATE |
| | THE ACTUAL OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EACH OF THE OCCUPANCIES. |
| | THE EXIT WIDTH DOES PROVIDE THE AREA FOR EACH OCCUPANCY |
| | AND AREA PER OCCUPANT (TABLE 1004.1.2) BUT DOES NOT |
| | GIVE THE ACTUAL OCCUPANT LOAD PER STORY AND THE TOTAL |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD. 2017 FBC-B 1004.1 & TABLE 1004.1.2. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE "EGRESS WIDTH" TABLE AND |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS DON'T MATCH. PROVIDE THE |
| | NUMBER OF PEOPLE FOR EACH OCCUPANCY BASED ON THE GROSS |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 1004.1.2 |
| | FBC-BUILDING. AND, COORDINATE WITH NUMBER OF PEOPLE |
| | SHOWN ON FLOOR PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY. CLARIFY WHY ON |
| | THE SECOND FLOOR THERE ARE MORE CHAIRS THAN NUMBER OF |
| | PEOPLE SPECIFIED?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ALSO, REVISE INFORMATION ON THE EXIT WIDTH TABLE. |
| | REVISE SIZE OF STAIRS TO MATCH PLANS REVISED TO COMPLY |
| | WITH THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. AND, REVISE THE |
| | "EGRESS CAPACITY FACTOR" OF THE STAIRS TO COMPLY WITH |
| | SEC. 1005.3.1 FBC-BUILDING. THE FACTOR IS 0.3 NOT 0.2. |
| | |
| | IN ADDITION, REVISE THE ACTUAL WIDTH OF OPENINGS FOR |
| | "OTHER EGRESS COMPONENTS" ( EGRESS DOORS FOR EXAMPLE). |
| | SEE SEC. 1010.1.1 FBC-BUILDING FOR ACTUAL SIZE OF |
| | EGRESS DOORS AND REVISE INFORMATION ON PLANS AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1F)KEY NOTES ON SHEET 041-A-101 INDICATE THE DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD REQUIRING A 2 HOUR WALL BETWEEN THE B & S1 |
| | OCCUPANCY AND DECLARING THE BLOCK TO COMPLY WITH |
| | (U905). THIS DESIGN REQUIRES A D-2 A 8 INCH BLOCK, AND |
| | 2 HOUR FIRE RATED CONCRETE BLOCK. PLEASE NOTE WE WILL |
| | REQUIRE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE BLOCK MANUFACTURER THAT |
| | THEIR 2 HOUR RATING OF BLOCK COMPLIES WITH TABLE |
| | 722.3.2. (2017 FBC-B) MINIMUM EQUIVALENT THICKNESS OF |
| | BEARING OR NONBEARING CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS. PROVIDE |
| | THE TYPE OF AGGREGATE AND EQUIVALENT THICKNESS FOR THE |
| | 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. THE SAME FOR 12 INCH WIDE BLOCK, |
| | PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE BLOCK MANUFACTURER. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | WALL TYPES AND PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR. MISSING DETAILS FOR |
| | THE SPECIFIED FIRE RATED WALLS. PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL |
| | DETAIL FOR THE 2 HOUR FIRE RATED CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS |
| | (U905) SPECIFYING 2HR BLOCK. ALSO, PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | WALL DETAIL FOR THE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED PARTITION |
| | (U419). AND, CLEARLY TAG THEM ON THE FLOOR PLANS. IN |
| | ADDITION, CLEARLY SPECIFY IF IT'S 8" OR 12" CONCRETE |
| | BLOCK. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1G) 3RD REQUEST. SHEET A-501 WALL TYPES A3-A6 ALL SHOW |
| | BLOCK WALLS WITH EITHER 8 INCH OR 12 INCH CMU. EACH |
| | DETAIL SHOULD BE SPECIFIC TO BLOCK TYPE AND WALL TYPE. |
| | AGAIN THESE DETAILS DO NOT MATCH THE WALL |
| | IDENTIFICATION TAGS LOCATED IN SHEETS 041-A-101 AND |
| | 042-A-102. INFORMATION ON THE PLANS HAS TO BE SPECIFIC |
| | NO EITHER, OR. SUCH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL |
| | CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, |
| | AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS |
| | ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH |
| | INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC. 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON |
| | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE RESPONSE FOR ITEM 1(F) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 1H) OK. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | SECOND ROUND OF COMMENTS. THE LIFE SAFETY SHEET |
| | 002-G-101 SHOWS A SECOND STORY BUSINESS AND STORAGE |
| | OCCUPANCY, (ASSUMED S-1). THE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS SHOWN |
| | GOING DOWN THROUGH THE STAIRWAY MAKING THIS STAIRWAY |
| | EXIT ACCESS AND THE TRAVEL DISTANCE ON THE STAIRS TO BE |
| | TAKEN PARALLEL TO THE STAIRS. FROM THE FURTHEST POINT |
| | TAKEN ON THE SECOND FLOOR TO THE FIRST FLOOR LANDING |
| | THE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS BETWEEN 85 TO 90 FEET. THIS IS |
| | OVER THE ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL FROM |
| | TABLE 1006.3.2(2) OF 75 FEET AND OCCUPANT LOAD OF 49 |
| | FOR BUSINESS OR 29 FOR STORAGE OCCUPANCY. IF THE |
| | STAIRWAY WAS A RATED 1 HOUR EXIT STAIRWAY WITH OPENING |
| | PROTECTIVES AND EXIT PASSAGEWAY TO THE EXTERIOR, THEN |
| | THE TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR THE 2ND FLOOR WOULD WORK. |
| | PLEASE REVIEW ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXIT AND EXIT |
| | PASSAGEWAYS. EXIT PASSAGEWAYS ARE FOUND UNDER FBC-B |
| | 1024. PLEASE REVIEW VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS (FBC-B |
| | 1024.7) FOR EXIT PASSAGEWAYS AS WELL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS IS A TWO STORY BUILDING. TABLE 1006.3.2(2) |
| | FBC-BUILDING IS THE TABLE THAT APPLIES TO THIS |
| | BUILDING. IF THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FIRE |
| | CODE AND BUILDING CODE THEN THE MOST STRINGENT CODE |
| | PREVAILS. IT LOOKS LIKE THE STAIRWAY IS GOING TO BE AT |
| | LEAST ONE HOUR FIRE RATED. REVISE TRAVEL DISTANCE. SHOW |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE UP TO THE ENTRY OF THE STAIRWAY. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1J) 3RD REQUEST. VERSION # 2 STILL DOES NOT SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 1015.4 OPENING LIMITATIONS. |
| | REQUIRED GUARDS SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS THAT ALLOW |
| | PASSAGE OF A SPHERE 4 INCHES (102 MM) IN DIAMETER FROM |
| | THE WALKING SURFACE TO THE REQUIRED GUARD HEIGHT. ALSO |
| | THERE IS A DETAIL FOR RISE AND RUN BUT NO DIMENSION FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH 1015.4 FBC-B EXCEPTION 2. THE |
| | TRIANGULAR OPENINGS AT THE OPEN SIDES OF A STAIR, |
| | FORMED BY THE RISER, TREAD AND BOTTOM RAIL SHALL NOT |
| | ALLOW PASSAGE OF A SPHERE 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER. |
| | 1 ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. STAIRWAY GUARDRAIL. SHEET |
| | 049-A-101. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH: 2017 FBC-B 1015.4 OPENING LIMITATIONS. REQUIRED |
| | GUARDS SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS THAT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A |
| | SPHERE 4 INCHES (102 MM) IN DIAMETER FROM THE WALKING |
| | SURFACE TO THE REQUIRED GUARD HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | STAIR SECTION A4 ON SHEET 049-A-401 SPECIFIES 4" |
| | BETWEEN THE HORIZONTAL RAILING. THE DIMENSION NEEDS TO |
| | BE SMALLER THAN 4 INCHES SO IT DOESN'T ALLOW THE |
| | PASSAGE OF 4" SPHERE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, THE REQUESTED INFORMATION FOR THE LIMITATIONS ON |
| | THE TRIANGULAR AREA AT THE OPEN SIDE OF THE STAIRS WAS |
| | NOT PROVIDED. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2A) 3RD REQUEST. THERE MUST BE A PERMANENT MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS TO REACH THE ROOF TOP HATCH. |
| | 1ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. SHEET 042-A102 THE 2ND FLOOR |
| | PLAN AND ROOF PLAN OF THE REPAIR GARAGE, SHOWS A ROOF |
| | HATCH TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE |
| | ROOF. SHEET 047-A-301 SHOWS A VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM |
| | THE FINISH FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BAR JOIST OF |
| | 14.66 FEET, CENTERED IN THE SERVICE BAY DOORWAY. THE |
| | VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM FINISH FLOOR TO THE TOP OF THE |
| | ROOF AT THE ROOF HATCH IS OVER 18.50 FEET. PLEASE SHOW |
| | HOW COMPLIANCE WITH 306.5 OF THE 2017 MECHANICAL CODE |
| | WILL BE MET: |
| | 2017 FBC-MECHANICAL. 306.5 EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES ON |
| | ROOFS OR ELEVATED STRUCTURES. |
| | WHERE EQUIPMENT REQUIRING ACCESS OR APPLIANCES ARE |
| | LOCATED ON AN ELEVATED STRUCTURE OR THE ROOF OF A |
| | BUILDING SUCH THAT PERSONNEL WILL HAVE TO CLIMB HIGHER |
| | THAN 16 FEET (4877 MM) ABOVE GRADE TO ACCESS SUCH |
| | EQUIPMENT OR APPLIANCES, AN INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR MEANS |
| | OF ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDED. SUCH ACCESS SHALL NOT |
| | REQUIRE CLIMBING OVER OBSTRUCTIONS GREATER THAN 30 |
| | INCHES (762 MM) IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | UNABLE TO FIND DETAIL A6/A-503 FOR ROOF LADDER. PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2B) OK. |
| | 2C) OK. |
| | 3) OK. |
| | 4) OK. |
| | 5) OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6) 3RD REQUEST. THE SUBMITTED NOA: 14-0827.18TAMKO |
| | MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM OVER STEEL DECK HAS |
| | VARIOUS SUB-SYSTEMS LISTED WITHIN THE REPORT BUT NONE |
| | OF THE SUB-SYSTEMS WERE IDENTIFIED AS THE ONE BEING |
| | INSTALLED. : FOR ALL ROOFING PRODUCTS PLEASE IDENTIFY |
| | ALL ROOFING SUB-SYSTEMS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED PRESSURES |
| | FOR ROOF ZONE # 1. REVIEW THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | LIMITATIONS, IF ENHANCED FASTENING IS ALLOWED |
| | (LIMITATION #7 ALLOWS ENHANCED FASTENING, LIMITATION # |
| | 9 DOES NOT ALLOW ENHANCED FASTENING) FOR ROOF ZONES 2 & |
| | 3. FASTENER DENSITIES SHALL BE INCREASED FOR BOTH |
| | INSULATION & THE BASE SHEET AS CALCULATED IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARDS RAS 117. CALCULATION |
| | PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR REGISTERED ARCHITECT. |
| | 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY WAS NOT SELECTED. AND, NEED SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR SELECTED ASSEMBLY |
| | (GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ONLY). IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY |
| | IS LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #9 AND THE ASSEMBLY |
| | DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, |
| | THEN IT CAN NOT BE USED. |
| | NOTE: ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS CAN BE SUBMITTED LATER AS |
| | DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. ADVICE IF PREFER TO SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7) 3RD REQUEST. THE SUBMITTAL NOA: 16-0219.01 TC-5 |
| | SERIES STEEL ROOF CURB FOR TRANE ROOF TOP UNITS. PLEASE |
| | REVIEW SHEET 4 AND 5 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | TECHNICAL NOTES. RESTRAINT BRACKET QUANTITY IS |
| | DETERMINED BY PROJECT SPECIFIC CALCULATIONS, PERFORMED |
| | BY A FLORIDA LICENSED PE OR FLORIDA REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT THAT CONSIDER THE UNIQUE COMBINATION OF THE |
| | UNIT SIZE AND APPLICABLE LATERAL AND UPLIFT PRESSURES |
| | FOR EACH JOB. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATION FOR HOW MANY |
| | BRACKETS WILL BE NEEDED FOR EACH TYPE OF UNIT. |
| | 107.2.1.3. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. 2017 |
| | FBC-M- 301.15 WIND RESISTANCE. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, |
| | APPLIANCES AND SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL |
| | BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES |
| | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNIT CURB AND |
| | ATTACHMENT RESPONSE LETTER. THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE |
| | LETTER STATS THAT 2 BRACKETS ARE REQUIRED PER SIDE FOR |
| | A TOTAL OF 4 BRACKETS EACH UNIT. IF TWO BRACKETS ARE |
| | REQUIRED PER SIDE, THEN THE TOTAL IS 8 BRACKETS PER |
| | UNIT NOT 4. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8) 3RD REQUEST. THE SUBMITTAL NOA: 17-1017.14 TRULITE |
| | SERIES 3100 REGISTER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT/ WINDOW WALL |
| | SYSTEM- L. M. I. SHEETS 2-5 DO NOT OPEN FOR REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE NOTE ON PAGE 6 ONLY THE BOTTOM SERIES OF GLASS |
| | IS HIGHLIGHTED FOR PRESSURES. THE UPPER WINDOW GLASS IS |
| | NOT MENTIONED. THE UPPER GLAZING UNITS WHICH HAVE BOTH |
| | VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FRAMING MEMBERS ARE NOT |
| | IDENTIFIED ON SHEETS 8 AND 9 OF THE REPORT NOR IS THE |
| | CHART HIGHLIGHTED OR CIRCLED TO IF THE JAMBS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE STEEL RE-ENFORCED. SHEET 10 OF 17 THE |
| | DOOR MULLION INDICATES TRULITE DOORS ARE UNDER A |
| | SEPARATE NOA. SHEET 13 OF 17 THE ANCHOR LOAD CHART IS |
| | NOT IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE OF ANCHOR FOR THE FRAME |
| | WIDTH AND HEIGHT. |
| | IDENTIFY GLAZING/ MULLIONS. |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL BEFORE |
| | SUBMITTING TO DESIGNER OF RECORD AND BEFORE SUBMISSION |
| | TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. FOR ALL PRODUCTS WITH |
| | GLAZING, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE OPENING WIDTH & HEIGHT, |
| | TYPE OF GLAZING, MULLION SIZE, LENGTH IF UNREINFORCED |
| | OR REINFORCED INFORMATION IF REQUIRED, ATTACHMENTS AND |
| | ASSOCIATE PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING SIZE. 2017 FBC-B |
| | 1405.13.1 INSTALLATION. WINDOWS AND DOORS SHALL BE |
| | INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED MANUFACTURER?S |
| | INSTRUCTIONS. FASTENER SIZE AND SPACING SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN SUCH INSTRUCTIONS AND SHALL BE CALCULATED |
| | BASED ON MAXIMUM LOADS AND SPACING USED IN THE TESTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE THE NOA FOR TRULITE DOORS AS SPECIFIED |
| | ON THE STOREFRONT NOA AND AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 9) OK. |
| | 10) OK |
| | 11) OK |
| | 12) OK |
| | |
| | 13) INFORMATIONAL: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| | FOR CONTACT INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | MS. SYBILLE WELTER ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR |
| | 822-1515 E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 14) IMPACT FEES - SEE IMPACT FEES REVIEW STOP FOR |
| | PROCEDURE. |
| | |
| | 15) A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW |
| | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE |
| | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE |
| | TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE |
| | COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
