Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 19040126
Permit Number 19040126
Review Stop M
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2019-07-18 13:18:252ND REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #19040126
 7/18/19
  
 CODES IN EFFECT:
  
 FBC B- FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017
 FBC M- FLORIDA MECHANICAL CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017
 FBC EC- FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE SIXTH EDITION
 2017
 FBC FG- FLORIDA FUEL GAS CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017
 FBC EX- FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION
 2017
 FS- FLORIDA STATUTES
 FAC- FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 WPB- WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SIXTH
 EDITION 2017
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
 THE FOLLOWING REVIEW COMMENTS ARE BASED ON REVIEW OF
 THE RESUBMITTED PLANS AND THE SUBMITTED NARRATIVE BY
 THE EOR DON PENN IN RESPONSE TO THE 1ST REVIEW
 COMMENTS.
  
 1) M1.1: RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM THE SALONS TO THE
 COMMON AREAS- ENTRY HALL, CORRIDORS, AND BREAKROOM IS
 PROHIBITED PER TABLE 403.3.1.1 FOOTNOTE B FBC M.
  
 2) M1.3: PROVIDE THE SIZES OF THE MAIN EXHAUST DUCTS
 FROM THE SALONS TO THE ROOF FANS EF-3 & EF-4.
  
 3) M1.3: PROVIDE THE SEQUENCES OF OPERATION FOR THE
 EF-3 & EF-4. IT APPEARS BY THE DESIGN THAT THE FANS
 WILL HAVE TO RUN CONTINOUSLY WHEN THE SALON IS OPEN.
 WILL THE FANS BE INTERLOCKED WITH THE AC OR LIGHTING
 SYSTEMS- SEE SECTION 501.4 FBC M.
  
 4) M1.1: BASED ON THE SUBMITTED SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 DRYERS, MAKEUP AIR FOR EXHAUST IS REQUIRED. THE PLAN
 SHOWS AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF SUPPLY AND RETURN AIR IN THE
 ROOM. PLEASE NOTE THAT CFMS SHOWN IN THE AIR BALANCE
 SCHEDULE ON SHEET M1.3 DO NOT MATCH THE CFMS ON THE
 M1.1 PLAN.
  
 5) M1.1 & M1.2: IN REFERENCE TO COMMENT #4 FROM THE 1ST
 REVIEW, PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S DATA SHEETS TO
 VERIFY THE 5-TON AC SYSTEMS CANNOT PRODUCE MORE 2000
 CFMS OF SUPPLY AIR, OR PROVIDE THE DS DETECTORS.
  
 6) M1.1: THE EXHAUST DETAIL APPEARS TO SHOW FLEX DUCTS
 BEING USED FOR TOILET EXHAUST, HOWEVER METAL DUCTWORK
 IS REQUIRED PER SMACNA HVAC CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS.
  
 7) IN REFERENCE TO COMMENT #8 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW, THE
 REQUESTED AC CALCULATIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED, HOWEVER
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED.
  
 8) M1.2: IN REFERENCE TO COMMENT #9 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW
 THE REQUESTED WIND LOAD ENGINEERING HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETELY PROVIDED. A) NOTE #5 DOES NOT INDICATE THE
 TYPE AND SIZE OF SCREWS FOR ATTACHING THE RTU'S TO THE
 CURBS. B) STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR ATTACHING THE CURBS TO
 THE ROOF STRUCTURE NOT PROVIDED. C) WIND DESIGN
 CRITERIA NOT PROVIDED. D) STRUCTURAL DETAILS AND/OR
 NOA'S FOR THE ROOFTOP PLANS NOT PROVIDED.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
 CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND
 KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved