| Date |
Text |
| 2019-05-20 14:45:48 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | 1500 ELIZABETH AVE. SUITE A |
| | LEVEL 3 ALTERATION |
| | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY (S-2 TO B) |
| | FLOOD ZONE "AE", BFE 12.1' NAVD |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD |
| | AREA. BASED ON THEPBC PROPERTY APPRAISER'S IMPROVEMENT |
| | VALUE ($456,220.00) OF THE BUILDING, THE COST OF THE |
| | PROPOSED WORK ($835,735.00) EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF THE |
| | MARKET VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE AND IS A SUBSTANTIAL |
| | IMPROVEMENT. THEREFORE, THE RENOVATED BUILDING IS |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT CITY FLOOD |
| | ORDINANCE. THE LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION AND ANY EQUIPMENT |
| | SERVICING THE BULDING IS REQUIRED TO BE AT OR ABOVE |
| | 12.1' + 2' FREE BOARD= 14.1" NAVD 88. BECASE THIS IS A |
| | COMMERCIAL BUILDING, IT CAN BE DRY FLOODPROOFED. SEE |
| | FEMA PUBLICATION FEMA P-758. FBC 1612.1 |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION C401.2. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY TO CLARIFY THE |
| | ORIENTATION OF THE STRUCTURE AND VERIFY DISTANCES TO |
| | LOT LINES. FBC 107.2 |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE A COMPASS ROSE ON THE FLOOR PLAN A-1.1 TO |
| | SHOW THE ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. FBC 107.2 |
| | |
| | 5) ON SHEET S-1 THE COMPASS ROSE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE |
| | ACCURATE. THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING FACES WEST AND ON |
| | SHEET S-1 IT IS INDICATED AS FACING SOUTH. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEET SP-1.0.0 APPEAR TO BE |
| | REVERSED. THE WEST ELEVATION SHOULD BE THE FRONT OF THE |
| | BUILDING WHICH FACES TOWARDS ELIZABETH AVE. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE ACCESSIBLE RAMP AND |
| | LANDING ON THE PLANS. FBC ACCESSIBILITY 405 |
| | |
| | 8) KEYNOTE 2 ON SHEET A-1.1 SPECIFIES NEW ALUMINUM |
| | RAILING AT 36" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR. FBC 1015.3 REQUIRES |
| | 42" FOR GUARDS AND FBC 1014.2 REQUIRES 34" TO 36" FOR |
| | HANDRAILS. |
| | |
| | 9) FBC 405.7 REQUIRES THE LANDINGS AT RAMPS TO BE A |
| | CLEAR LENGTH OF 60" LONG MINIMUM. |
| | |
| | 10) SOME OF THESE ITEMS WERE NOT PROVIDED OR WERE SHOWN |
| | INCORRECTLY ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS. |
| | THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING: |
| | A) NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS IN EACH AREA FBC 1004.1 |
| | B) CUMULATIVE OCCUPANT LOADS FBC 1004.1.1 |
| | C) EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCE FBC 1015.2.1 |
| | D) COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DISTANCE FBC 1014.3 |
| | E) EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE FBC 1016.3 |
| | F) CLEAR WIDTH OF THE EXIT OR EXIT ACCESS DOORS FBC |
| | 1008.1.1 |
| | G) CAPACITY OF EGRESS DOORS, OCCUPANT LOAD SERVED AND |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS FACTOR FBC1005.3.2 |
| | H) DISTRIBUTION OF EGRESS CAPACITY FBC1005.5 |
| | |
| | 11) THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY ON |
| | THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN. FBC 107.2 & CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS |
| | COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL. THAT PORTION OF THE EXIT |
| | ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE MOST REMOTE |
| | POINT WITHIN A STORY TO THAT POINT WHERE THE OCCUPANTS |
| | HAVE SEPARATE AND DISTINCT ACCESS TO TWO EXITS OR EXIT |
| | ACCESS DOORWAYS. |
| | |
| | 12) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE |
| | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND |
| | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | |
