City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Notes

Plan Review Notes For Permit 19020384
Permit Number	19020384
Review Stop	ENG-P
Sequence Number	1

Notes

Date	Text
2021-07-01 09:26:46	REF #20121293

	CONTACT: [email protected]
2021-06-07 14:31:18	1. SH C1 PROVIDE LAT - LONG FOR FIBER/POWER PULL-BOX.

	CONTACT: [email protected]
2019-02-21 13:18:27	PERMIT 19020384 - 370 S ROSEMARY AVE STREET POLE

	PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE
	DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401
	OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE
	COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.
	THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO
	REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF
	HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS,
	THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION,
	NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE
	APPROVED.

	1) ENGINEERING PLANS / NO CD OF PLANS PROVIDED.

	A. THE ENGINEERING PLANS WERE SUBMITTED AT A 1/16TH = 1
	FOOT SCALE, WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CITY CODE
	SCALE REQUIREMENT OF 10FT, 20FT, OR 40FT SCALE. PROVIDE
	THE PLANS AT THE REQUIRED SCALE.

	B. 300 BLOCK OF S ROSEMARY AVE WAS RECONSTRUCTED LAST
	YEAR. THE ENGINEERING PLANS THAT YOU SUBMITTED DO NOT
	SHOW THE POST CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS AND INCLUDING
	UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORK AS WELL AS THE USE OF A
	SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM TO PERMIT AND EXPANDED TREE
	ROOT GROWTH. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND FEATURES,
	SUCH AS THE SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM, NEED TO BE
	PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY THUS DO NOT ACCURATELY SHOW THE
	PLACEMENT LOCATION FOR THE PROPOSED FACILITIES. PROVIDE
	ACCURATE PLANS BASED ON THE BELOW AND ABOVEGROUND
	SURVEYS.

	C) PROPOSED POLE DOES NOT SHOW ORIENTATION TO THE
	STREET.

	D) NO DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SH C4.

	E) SH E4 / GROUND ROD DETAIL DIMENSION "A" NOT SHOWN.

	F) HAND HOLD NOT LOCATED ON DRAWING.

	G) ALL RESTORATION PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS.

	H) ALL ROADWAY CUTS MIN OF 25FT EITHER SIDE OF TRENCH,
	FULL LANE.

	H) IRRIGATION LINES NOT SHOWN ON DRAWINGS.

	2) SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - THE BASE OF THE
	POLE IS BEING INSTALLED UNDERGROUND SO THIS IS
	REQUIRED. SURVEY OVER AERIAL.

	A. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
	SURVEY INFORMATION.

	3) SURVEY OF ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES - A NEW POLE IS
	BEING INSTALLED ABOVEGROUND SO THIS IS REQUIRED.

	A. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, CLEMATIS STREET WAS JUST
	COMPLETELY RECONSTRUCTED. ALL ABOVEGROUND FEATURES,
	INCLUDING LANDSCAPE, NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY.

	B. THE ENGINEERING PLAN MUST BE BASED OFF OF THIS
	SURVEY INFORMATION.

	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE OUTDATED SURVEY DOES NOT
	PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING UTILITY POLE BASE
	DIAMETER, WHICH WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE
	REVISED SURVEY.

	D. IDENTIFY ALL ABOVEGROUND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN
	THE AREA TO INCLUDE AN INVENTORY OF THE REGISTRANT'S
	EXISTING FACILITIES - NO INFORMATION ON EXISTING
	FACILITIES WAS PROVIDED. SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON THE
	PLANS AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE. IF THERE ARE NO
	FACILITIES, THIS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SURVEY.

	E. PLEASE NOTE: THE EXISTING DECORATIVE LIGHTS SHOWN ON
	THE SURVEY ARE 17 FEET TALL (CITY CODE REQUIREMENT FOR
	CLEMATIS STREET). THE SUPPORT POLE INCLUDED WITH THE
	APPLICATION IS 25 FEET IN HEIGHT, WHICH EXCEEDS THE
	ALLOWANCE LISTED IN SECTION 94-411(G)(1) OF THE CITY
	CODE.

	4) CONCEALMENT METHODS DESCRIPTIONS - NO CONCEALMENT
	INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED
	SUPPORT POLE DOES NOT MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT
	STANDARDS OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE.
	PROVIDE PLANS AND NARRATIVE ON HOW THE INSTALLATION
	COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S CONCEALMENT REQUIREMENT.

	5) RESTORATION ESTIMATE - YOU MUST PROVIDE A
	RESTORATION ESTIMATE FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE
	POLE, NOT A GENERIC ESTIMATE THAT IS NOT LINKED TO THE
	SPECIFIC LOCATION AND WORK TO BE DONE.

	6) RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE - NO INFORMATION WAS
	PROVIDED THAT THE PROPOSED FACILITIES WILL NOT CAUSE
	RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE WITH THE CITY'S PUBLIC
	SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE A STATEMENT
	REGARDING RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE.

	7) EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVERAGE - THE CERTIFICATE OF
	LIABILITY INSURANCE LISTS PALM BEACH COUNTY AS THE
	ADDITIONAL INSURED. THE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY
	INSURANCE NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO NAME THE CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH, ITS COMMISSIONERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND
	AGENTS AS ADDITIONAL INSURED.

	8) START OF OPERATION - AN ATTESTATION FROM THE
	COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES SERVICE PROVIDER THAT
	COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FACILITIES WILL BE INSTALLED
	AND OPERATIONAL ON THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE NO LATER THAN
	NINE MONTHS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION IS APPROVED
	IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ATTESTATION.

	9) PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS, TELEPHONE, NATURAL GAS,
	ELECTRIC SERVICE, AND TELEVISION CABLE - THE PUBLIC
	UTILITY LETTERS WERE NOT PROVIDED. WHILE IMPORTANT, THE
	811 RESPONSE FORM DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
	PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS.

	10) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL - THE SUBMITTAL WAS
	NOT PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORM. A COPY OF ALL OF THE
	SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC
	FORMAT.

	11) PROOF OF MAILING NOTICE TO OWNERS, ONE COPY OF
	ADDRESS LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESSES WITHIN 250
	FEET AND ONE COPY OF RADIUS MAP PROVIDED BY THE PAPA
	SHOWING THOSE PROPERTIES WITHIN 250 FEET OF AFFECTED
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY - A COPY OF THE RADIUS MAP WAS NOT
	SUBMITTED. THE OWNER'S ADDRESS LIST, WHILE SUBMITTED IS
	SUCH A SMALL FONT THAT IT IS NOT EASILY READABLE.
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE RADIUS MAP FROM PAPA AND THE ADDRESS
	LIST AT A BIGGER, READABLE FONT.

	12) PUBLIC NOTICE MAILER AFFIDAVIT - THE AFFIDAVIT WAS
	PROVIDED, BUT NOTHING TO SHOW WHAT WAS MAILED OUT WAS
	PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE INFORMATION.

	CONTACT GORDON PATRIE @ (561) 494-1082
	[email protected]