Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 19020053
Permit Number 19020053
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 9
Notes
Date Text
2022-07-27 08:41:02INSUFFICIENT
  
 1) A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR,
 MUST BE UPLOADED FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PROJECT.
 THE RESPONSE STATES THAT THE ENGINEERING PLANS ARE
 BASED ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROPERTY APPRAISER
 MAPS ARE NOT A SURVEY AND OFTEN DO NOT SHOW ACCURATE
 PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RELATIONSHIP, WHICH IS
 WHY THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THE PLANS TO BE BASED OFF A
 PROVIDED SURVEY. SURVEY SHEETS, CREATED BY PRINCIPAL
 MERIDIAN SURVEYING, INC., DATED 11-15-20 AND 2-17-20,
 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO THE CITY AS PART OF PREVIOUS
 APPLICATIONS AND THE ONES THAT STILL SHOW EXISTING
 CONDITIONS MAY BE UPLOADED FOR USE. PLEASE NOTE THE
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS, SOME OF WHICH HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY
 PROVIDED AND SOME ARE BASED ON THE NEWLY SUBMITTED
 PLANS.
  
 A. CURRENT SHEET 10 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 00+00 AND
 PROPOSED BORE PIT 02+80, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN
 THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON SHEET
 10. THE ROW LINE IS SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SIDEWALK
 ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW LINE CALLED OUT ON SHEET 10
 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK.
 WHILE THE BORE APPEARS TO BE WITHIN THE ROW, PROPOSED
 BORE PIT 02+80 WOULD BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE NO
 EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 B. CURRENT SHEET 11 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 05+10 AND ADDITIONAL HHS, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN
 THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON SHEET 11
 ALONG CLARE AVE. THE ROW LINE IS SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE OF
 THE SIDEWALK ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW LINE CALLED
 OUT ON SHEET 11 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AT THE BACK
 OF THE SIDEWALK. WHILE THE BORE APPEARS TO BE WITHIN
 THE ROW, PROPOSED HH 05+10 WOULD BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 WHERE NO EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. THIS IS NOT
 PERMITTED. THE REMAINING HH ARE ALL WITHIN THE ROW.
 C. CURRENT SHEET 12 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 13+80 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 D. CURRENT SHEET 13 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 23+25 AND BORE PIT 19+90, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN
 THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON SHEET 13
 WITHIN THE OKEECHOBEE ROAD ROW. THE ROW LINE IS SHOWN
 IN THE TRAVEL LANE ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW LINE
 CALLED OUT ON SHEET 13 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION AT
 THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. THE BORE APPEARS TO BE ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE NO EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE
 SURVEY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 E. CURRENT SHEET 14 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 28+08 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS, SHOWS A DISCREPANCY
 BETWEEN THE ROW LINE ON THE SURVEY AND THE ROW LINE ON
 SHEET 14 WITHIN THE OKEECHOBEE ROAD ROW. THE ROW LINE
 IS SHOWN IN THE TRAVEL LANE ON THE SURVEY WHILE THE ROW
 LINE CALLED OUT ON SHEET 14 IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION
 AT THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. THE BORE, BORE PIT 26+25
 AND HH 28+08 APPEAR TO BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHERE NO
 EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 MERCER AVENUE, NORTH OF OKEECHOBEE ROAD, SHOWS THE BORE
 AND BORE PIT IN THE ROW.
 F. CURRENT SHEET 15 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED BORE
 PIT 34+63, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 G. CURRENT SHEET 16 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 40+70, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 H. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 20 OF 31 (CURRENT 17/18 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 45+15, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 NOTE: SURVEY PAGE 8 OF 19 VERIFIED THAT THIS PORTION OF
 PROJECT IS WITHIN PBC ROW. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD THE
 REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS SEPARATE
 EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE UPLOADED.
 I. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 21 OF 31 (CURRENT 18/19 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 50+24, IS PASSED BY ZONING.
 BASED ON THE WIDTH OF THE ROW, THE PROXIMITY OF THE
 BORE TO THE OFF RAMP AND THE NEW PLANS, NO SURVEY
 REQUIRED AT THIS LOCATION. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD THE
 REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS SEPARATE
 EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE UPLOADED.
 J. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 22 OF 31 (CURRENT 19/20 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES HH 55+07. PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENT: THE SURVEY OF THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE AT THIS LOCATION IS
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT IF THE BORE ENCROACHES. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD
 THE REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS
 SEPARATE EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE
 UPLOADED.
 K. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 23 OF 31 (CURRENT 20/21 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 60+69. PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENT: THE BORE ON SHEET 23 STILL SHOWS ENCROACHMENT
 ON PRIVATE PROPERTY (OWNED BY FPL). UNLESS THERE IS A
 UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AT THESE
 LOCATIONS, YOU MAY NOT CROSS ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 NOTE: BASED ON REVIEWING THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY
 APPRAISER SITE, THE SIDEWALK IS NOT WHOLLY WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY; THEREFORE, YOUR BORE UNDER THE SIDEWALK
 CROSSES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 THE SURVEY IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT EITHER YOU ARE
 NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OR THAT THERE IS A UTILITY
 EASEMENT FOR WHERE YOU ENCROACH. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD
 THE REVISED SHEET THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS
 SEPARATE EMAIL PACKET TO ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE
 UPLOADED.
 L. 2/2/22 SUBMITTED SHEET 24 OF 31 (CURRENT 21/22 OF
 29), WHICH INCLUDES HH 67+59, IS PASSED BY ZONING. NO
 SURVEY FOR THIS AREA IS REQUIRED SINCE STAFF HAS
 REVIEWED THE SURVEYS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OKEECHOBEE AT
 THIS LOCATION TO VERIFY THE THAT BACK OF SIDEWALK IS
 THE ROW LINE. NOTE: PLEASE UPLOAD THE REVISED SHEET
 THAT WAS PROVIDED TO ZONING AS SEPARATE EMAIL PACKET TO
 ENSURE MOST CURRENT PLANS ARE UPLOADED. THESE PLANS
 SHOW THE CORRECT ROW LINES AS WELL.
 M. CURRENT SHEET 23 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 74+83, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE SAPODILLA
 AVE SECTION OF THE BORE IS WITHIN THE ROW AND DOES NOT
 INTERFERE WITH EXISTING TREES AND INFRASTRUCTURE. FROM
 THE RECENT RECONSTRUCTION OF THIS AREA, STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THE ROW LINE IS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN AND THAT BORE PIT 70+88 ENCROACHES ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED AS THERE IS NO
 UTILITY EASEMENT AT THAT LOCATION.
 N. *** UPLOAD PLAN INCLUDED IN EMAIL TO CITY BUT NOT IN
 THE PERMIT SET. PREVIOUS PLAN SUBMITTAL FAILS FOR SAME
 REASON - CURRENT SHEET 24 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES
 PROPOSED HH 82+78, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY
 FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY
 THAT THE BORE IS WITHIN THE ROW. FROM THE RECENT
 RECONSTRUCTION OF THIS AREA, STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE
 ROW LINE IS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 AND THAT HH 82+78 ENCROACHES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHICH
 IS NOT PERMITTED AS THERE IS NO UTILITY EASEMENT AT
 THAT LOCATION.
 O. CURRENT SHEET 25 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES BORE PIT
 02+50, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE IS
 WITHIN THE ROW. BORE PIT 02+50 IS SHOWN ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY WITH NO EASEMENT AND IS NOT PERMITTED.
 P. CURRENT SHEET 26 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 08+35,
 REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE AND HH
 IS WITHIN THE ROW.
 Q. CURRENT SHEET 27 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 14+90, REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE, BORE
 PITS AND HH IS WITHIN THE ROW. THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 FAILS TO SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES ALONG SAPODILLA. THE
 EDGE OF THE HH EXCAVATION IS REQUIRED TO BE AT LEAST 10
 FEET FROM A TREE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE TREE AND ITS
 ROOT SYSTEM. HH 14+90 DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT
 AND MUST BE IN AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION. YOU ARE NOT
 PERMITTED TO OPEN CUT AROUND THE TREE AS SHOWN.
 R. CURRENT SHEET 28 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 22+10,
 REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE, BORE
 PITS AND HH ARE WITHIN THE ROW. THE ROW HAS BEEN
 RECONSTRUCTED SINCE THE LAST SURVEY THAT WAS PROVIDED.
 THERE ARE PLANTERS THAT ARE BOTH SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN ON
 THE ENGINEERING PLANS SURROUNDED BY A STRUCTURAL SOIL
 SYSTEM THAT IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE DISTURBED BY THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE PROPOSED HH 22+10 OR THE BORE
 ROUTE, SO THE CURRENT LOCATION IS NOT APPROVED. THE
 FULL AREA COVERED BY THE STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE
 SIDEWALK IS A MINIMUM OF 19 FEET EAST TO WEST AND THE
 FULL DEPTH OF THE SIDEWALK FROM THE CURB TO THE EDGE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. NO EXCAVATION OR INSTALLATION
 MAY OCCUR CLOSER THAN SEVEN (7) FEET FROM A PARALLEL
 LINE WITH THE OUTER EDGES OF THE PLANTER WALLS, FROM
 THE CURB FACE TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THIS SHALL BE
 CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED ON THE PLANS. ANY BORE SHALL
 CLEARLY BE SHOWN TO BE AT LEAST 36 INCHES BELOW THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM LIMITS. THIS COMMENT WAS
 PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.
 S. CURRENT SHEET 29 OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 28+45,
 REQUIRES A SURVEY, PREPARED BY FLORIDA LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BORE, BORE
 PITS AND HH IS WITHIN THE ROW. THE ROW HAS BEEN
 RECONSTRUCTED SINCE THE LAST SURVEY THAT WAS PROVIDED.
 THE PLANTERS THAT ARE SHOWN ENGINEERING PLANS ARE
 SURROUNDED BY A STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM THAT IS NOT
 PERMITTED TO BE DISTURBED BY THE INSTALLATION OF THE
 PROPOSED HH 25+35 OR THE BORE ROUTE, SO THE CURRENT
 LOCATION IS NOT APPROVED. THE FULL AREA COVERED BY THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER THE SIDEWALK IS A MINIMUM OF 19
 FEET EAST TO WEST AND THE FULL DEPTH OF THE SIDEWALK
 FROM THE CURB TO THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. NO
 EXCAVATION OR INSTALLATION MAY OCCUR CLOSER THAN SEVEN
 (7) FEET FROM A PARALLEL LINE WITH THE OUTER EDGES OF
 THE PLANTER WALLS, FROM THE CURB FACE TO THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. THIS SHALL BE CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED
 ON THE PLANS. ANY BORE SHALL CLEARLY BE SHOWN TO BE AT
 LEAST 36 INCHES BELOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM
 LIMITS. THIS COMMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.
  
 2) THE BORE SHOWN AT 5 TO 12 FEET BELOW GRADE IS AT A
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO AVOID TREE AND PALM DAMAGE. THE
 FOLLOWING BORE PROFILE SHEETS, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY
 LISTED, COMPLY WITH ZONING REQUIREMENTS:
  
 A. SHEET 10A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 00+00 AND
 PROPOSED BORE PIT 02+80.
 B. SHEETS 11A AND 11B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDE PROPOSED HH
 05+10 AND ADDITIONAL HHS.
 C. SHEETS 12A AND 12B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDE PROPOSED HH
 13+80 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS.
 D. SHEETS 13A AND 13B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDE PROPOSED HH
 23+25 AND BORE PIT 19+90.
 E. SHEET 14A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 28+08
 AND ADDITIONAL BORE PITS.
 F. SHEET 15A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED BORE PIT
 34+63.
 G. SHEET 16A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 40+70.
 H. SHEET 20A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 45+15 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 I. SHEET 21A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 50+24 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 J. SHEET 22A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES HH 55+07 NOT IN CITY
 ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 K. SHEET 23A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 60+69 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 L. SHEET 24A OF 31, WHICH INCLUDES TIE IN 60+69 NOT IN
 CITY ROW SO NO ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 M. SHEET 23A AND 23C OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 74+8 APPROVED BY ZONING AND 23B NOT IN CITY ROW SO NO
 ZONING REVIEW OF UTILITY PROFILE.
 N. *** PLAN INCLUDED IN EMAIL TO CITY BUT NOT IN THE
 PERMIT SET. SHEET 24A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH
 82+78.
 O. SHEET 25A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES BORE PIT 02+50.
 P. SHEET 26A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 08+35.
 Q. SHEET 27A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 14+90,
 DOES NOT PASS ZONING DUE TO HH 14+90 DIRECTLY IMPACTING
 TREE ROOTS.
 R. SHEET 28A AND 28B OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES HH 22+10,
 DOES NOT PASS ZONING UNTIL THE AVOIDANCE OF THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM IS PROVIDED.
 S. SHEET 29A OF 29, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED HH 25+35,
 DOES NOT PASS ZONING UNTIL THE AVOIDANCE OF THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM IS PROVIDED.
  
 3) THE CITY HAS ON FILE THE PRIVATE UTILITY PROVIDER
 APPROVAL OF THE BORE FOR ALL OF THE SECTIONS EXCEPT THE
 NEWLY SHOWN SAPODILLA AND FERN SECTIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE
 UPDATED LETTERS FOR THESE SECTIONS OR CLEARLY
 DEMONSTRATE THAT ALL BORES, HANDHOLES AND BORE PITS ARE
 AT LEAST FIVE FEET FROM EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY
 FACILITIES.
  
 4) PLEASE DO NOT UPLOAD THE MOT PLANS WITH THIS WCF ROW
 PERMIT. MOT PLANS ARE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
  
 5) PROVIDE AN UPDATED PLAN KEY SHEET FOR THE LENGTH OF
 THE PROJECT. THIS WAS INCLUDED IN THE SET OF PLANS
 EMAILED TO PLANNING STAFF.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved