| Date |
Text |
| 2020-03-16 16:47:07 | INCOMPLETE APPLICATION |
| | |
| | PERMIT 19020053 - MCIMETRO PROJECT #:1801CVFF.210 |
| | UNDERGROUND FIBER CLARE TO CLEMATIS - 2ND REVIEW |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIST BELOW FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE |
| | DEFICIENCIES IN INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 78-401 |
| | OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE AS PART OF THE |
| | COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLACEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | THE DEFICIENT INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO |
| | REVIEW THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF |
| | HAS ALSO INCLUDED SOME SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW COMMENTS, |
| | THAT WHILE NOT RESULTING IN A DEFICIENT APPLICATION, |
| | NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR THE PERMIT WILL NOT BE |
| | APPROVED. |
| | |
| | 1) ENGINEERING PLANS |
| | |
| | A. UPDATED COMMENT: THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CLARE AVENUE |
| | RESIDENTIAL PROJECT (CLARE AND WILKINS AVENUES), THE |
| | ROSEMARY AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, THE 360 SOUTH |
| | ROSEMARY PROJECT (SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE AND FERN |
| | STREET), THE QUADRILLE/FERN MAST ARM INSTALLATION |
| | PROJECT AND THE CLEMATIS STREET PHASE III PROJECT. |
| | STAFF NEEDS TO VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED FIBER CONDUIT, |
| | MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS AND FUTURE COMMUNICATION POLES |
| | DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THESE APPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | PROJECTS. |
| | |
| | 2) UPDATED COMMENT: SURVEY OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES - |
| | THE SURVEY NEEDS TO BE AT A SIZE/SCALE THAT IS LEGIBLE. |
| | STAFF IS UNABLE TO MAKE OUT ANY DETAILS ON THE SURVEY |
| | THAT WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | A. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | SURVEY. IF THE BORE IS PROPOSED WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF |
| | AN EXISTING UTILITY, YOU NEED TO PROVIDE A LETTER FROM |
| | THAT UTILITY THAT THE PROPOSED BORE DOES NOT INTERFERE |
| | WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES. |
| | |
| | B. THE SURVEY, PREPARED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, |
| | MUST SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, THE SIDEWALK, AND ANY |
| | TREES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE FIBER CONDUIT |
| | PATH. |
| | |
| | C. THE ENGINEERING PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS |
| | AS THE SURVEY, SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT NONE OF |
| | THE PROPOSED WORK (MARKER POLES, HANDHOLDS OR CONDUIT |
| | IS BEING INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THAT NO |
| | TREES (SPECIFICALLY THEIR ROOT SYSTEM) ARE BEING |
| | AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | D. PROVIDE THE SURVEY BACK UP FOR SHEETS 19 THROUGH 22, |
| | SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED WORK IS IN |
| | THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE LOCATION MAP LINE APPEARS TO |
| | CROSS OUT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ONTO PRIVATE |
| | PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: ESTIMATED SCHEDULE - NO SCHEDULE WAS |
| | PROVIDED. PROVIDE A NARRATIVE OF THE ESTIMATED SCHEDULE |
| | OF THE PROPOSED WORK. |
| | |
| | 4) POLE STYLE - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FUTURE POLES ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO MEET THE CITY CONCEALMENT STANDARDS |
| | OUTLINED IN SECTION 78-411 OF THE CITY CODE. |
| | |
| | NOTE: STAFF WILL NOT APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OF A SIX |
| | (6) FOOT TALL MARKER POLE ADJACENT TO THE HANDHOLES. IF |
| | THE HANDHOLES NEED TO BE MARKED, THEN PROVIDE THE |
| | INFORMATION ON THE HANDHOLE COVER. |
| | |
| | 5) ELECTRONIC FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL -. A COPY OF ALL OF |
| | THE SUBMITTAL MATERIAL MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
