| Date |
Text |
| 2019-01-18 12:57:41 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A 1 - THERE ARE TWO SCOPES OF PROJECT |
| | INDICATED, ONE STATES THE ADDRESS OF SEMINOLE PRATT |
| | WHITNEY RD AND THE OTHER FERN ST. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REMOVE THE ONE THAT IS NOT APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A 1 - UNDER SECTION 1.0 APPLICABLE CODES THERE |
| | IS AN INCORRECT EDITION OF THE CURRENT FLORIDA FIRE |
| | PREVENTION CODE. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | 6TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH |
| | INCLUDES THE 2015 EDITIONS OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A 1 - UNDER SECTION 2.0 BUILDING CODE, THERE |
| | IS AN INDICATION OF TYPE 3 UNPROTECTED, UNSPRINKLERED. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, ON SHEET A 3, THERE IS AN INDICATION NEXT |
| | TO MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE TO EXIT 75' SPRINKLERED. |
| | |
| | IS THE BUILDING PROTECTED WITH FIRE SPRINKLERES? |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND OR CORRECT. |
| | |
| | IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE A STATEMENT INDICATING SUCH AND |
| | THAT ALL WORK OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE |
| | UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
