| Date |
Text |
| 2019-03-11 16:04:21 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- REVISE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET C-1. BASED ON |
| | THE GRADE ELEVATIONS ON THE REAR OF THE LOT, IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE WATER IS BEING DIVERTED TO THE NEIGHBOR. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED SO WATER IS KEPT WITHIN THE LOT OR |
| | DIVERTED TO AN APPROVED COLLECTION POINT. |
| | |
| | FBC R 401.3 (DRAINAGE) |
| | FBC 107.2.5 (SITE PLAN) |
| | FBC 110.9 (IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION) |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS SECTION C-C WHICH SHOWS A |
| | BERM WITH ONE OF THE SLOPES TOWARDS THE REAR PROPERTY. |
| | THEREFORE, DIVERTING THE WATER TOWARD THE REAR REAR |
| | PROPERTY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- OK |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET D1: REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA SHOWN ON THE TOP |
| | MIDDLE OF THE SHEET: |
| | A) OK |
| | |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | 4- OK |
| | |
| | 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY COMPLIED. PROVIDE CORRECT NAME OF CONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)ITEM #5 ON PAGE 1 OF 5 STATES THAT THIS IS NOT A |
| | WORST CASE SCENARIO BUT ON PAGE 2 OF 5 IT SHOWS THAT |
| | THE HOUSE WAS ROTATED 315 DEGREES. THIS IS |
| | CONTRADICTORY. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE |
| | FOR THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)PROVIDE WINDOWS AND DOORS DOCUMENTATION FROM |
| | MANUFACTURER SHOWING THE SHGC FACTOR AND U-FACTOR |
| | EFFICIENCIES SHOWN ON ITEM #7 ON PAGE 1 OF 5. SEC. |
| | R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. NOTE: THIS IS ONLY |
| | REQUIRED WHEN PERSON DOING THE CALCULATIONS IS NOT |
| | USING THE PROGRAM DEFAULT FACTORS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) CEILING R-VALUE INSULATION ON ITEM #10 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUITED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. ALSO, THE ATTIC IS NOT |
| | VENTED. PLANS SPECIFY FOAM INSULATION. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E) PROVIDE THE NAME OF PERSON PERFORMING THE ANALYSIS |
| | AND GENERATING THE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R405.4.2.1 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | F) PARTIALLY DONE. THE VENT RATIO WAS REVISED, BUT I |
| | APOLOGIZE BECAUSE THIS ITEM WAS OVERLOOKED. THERE IS NO |
| | VENTED ATTIC. SEE ITEM #5D ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | G) REVISE WINDOWS ORIENTATION AND AREA ON PAGE 3 OF 5 |
| | TO MATCH ACTUAL ORIENTATION AND AREA SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5(B) ABOVE. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5(B) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| | SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. |
| | |
| | 6- OK. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL) |
| | |
| | A) PRECAST LINTELS. NOTE: NOA 16-0126.03 SPECIFIED ON |
| | SHEET 3 OF 7 IS EXPIRED. REVISE AS REQUIRED ALSO. THERE |
| | IS NO NEED TO SPECIFY NOA ON DRAWINGS. JUST REVIEW IN |
| | WRITING THE ACTUAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ONLY ONE COPY WAS |
| | SUBMITTED AND WAS VOID. NEED TWO COPIES. ALSO REQUIRED: |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO BE USED TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | C)GARAGE DOOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. DOOR |
| | DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD. PROVIDE DOOR THAT MEETS THE |
| | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | NOTE- |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8- OK. |
| | |
| | 9- OK. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
