| Date |
Text |
| 2019-01-25 17:05:59 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1- REVISE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET C-1. BASED ON |
| | THE GRADE ELEVATIONS ON THE REAR OF THE LOT, IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE WATER IS BEING DIVERTED TO THE NEIGHBOR. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED SO WATER IS KEPT WITHIN THE LOT OR |
| | DIVERTED TO AN APPROVED COLLECTION POINT. |
| | |
| | FBC R 401.3 (DRAINAGE) |
| | FBC 107.2.5 (SITE PLAN) |
| | FBC 110.9 (IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION) |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET 1 OF 7: ENGINEER TO REVISE THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN DON'T CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE "D". ALSO, |
| | CLARIFY WHAT ARE THE "OPENING DESIGN PRESSURE, PSF" |
| | SHOWN ON THE UPPER RIGHT SIDE OF DRAWING FOR. THEY |
| | DON'T MATCH DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATIONS EITHER. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET D1: REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA SHOWN ON THE TOP |
| | MIDDLE OF THE SHEET: |
| | A) THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY IS "D" NOT "C". NOTE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2 ABOVE. SEC. R301.2.1.4 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B)REVISE AND CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL THE LIVE AND DEAD |
| | LOADS ON THE ROOF TRUSSES. CLEARLY SPECIFY THE TOP AND |
| | BOTTOM CHORDS LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. NOTE: REVISE THE |
| | ATTIC LIVE LOAD (BOTTOM OF TRUSS CHORD). ACCORDING TO |
| | NOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL THE |
| | MIN. LIVE LOAD IS 20 POUNDS. |
| | |
| | 4- FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET 2 OF 7 DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSULATION IN THE WALLS BETWEEN |
| | THE GARAGE AND THE REST OF THE HOUSE. PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT/DELAYS. SEC. R103.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B)ITEM #5 ON PAGE 1 OF 5 STATES THAT THIS IS NOT A |
| | WORST CASE SCENARIO BUT ON PAGE 2 OF 5 IT SHOWS THAT |
| | THE HOUSE WAS ROTATED 315 DEGREES. THIS IS |
| | CONTRADICTORY. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE |
| | FOR THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C)PROVIDE WINDOWS AND DOORS DOCUMENTATION FROM |
| | MANUFACTURER SHOWING THE SHGC FACTOR AND U-FACTOR |
| | EFFICIENCIES SHOWN ON ITEM #7 ON PAGE 1 OF 5. SEC. |
| | R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. NOTE: THIS IS ONLY |
| | REQUIRED WHEN PERSON DOING THE CALCULATIONS IS NOT |
| | USING THE PROGRAM DEFAULT FACTORS. |
| | |
| | D) CEILING R-VALUE INSULATION ON ITEM #10 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUITED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) PROVIDE THE NAME OF PERSON PERFORMING THE ANALYSIS |
| | AND GENERATING THE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R405.4.2.1 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | F) REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 5. THE |
| | RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | OR, PROVIDE COMPLETE DOCUMENTATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON |
| | SEC. R806.2 AND COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER OF RECORD SO |
| | PLANS ARE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | G) REVISE WINDOWS ORIENTATION AND AREA ON PAGE 3 OF 5 |
| | TO MATCH ACTUAL ORIENTATION AND AREA SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5(B) ABOVE. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| | SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. |
| | |
| | 6- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WILL BE REVIEWED |
| | ONCE THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE REVISED/CLARIFIED. SEC. |
| | R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL) |
| | |
| | A) PRECAST LINTELS. NOTE: NOA 16-0126.03 SPECIFIED ON |
| | SHEET 3 OF 7 IS EXPIRED. REVISE AS REQUIRED ALSO. THERE |
| | IS NO NEED TO SPECIFY NOA ON DRAWINGS. JUST REVIEW IN |
| | WRITING THE ACTUAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 8-VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $264,094. THE |
| | PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $4617.18. |
| | |
| | 9- FOUNDATION PLAN (SHEET 4 OF 7) IS MISSING THE |
| | ENGINEER'S OF RECORD SEAL. CHAPTER 471 F.S. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
