| Date |
Text |
| 2019-05-21 15:21:02 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | FBC R 401.3 (DRAINAGE) |
| | FBC 107.2.5 (SITE PLAN) |
| | FBC 110.9 (IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION) |
| | |
| | NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET SP-1 IS INCOMPLETE. |
| | IT DOESN'T SHOW THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE FOR ENTIRE LOT |
| | AND THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON SECTION/DETAILS A-A AND B-B |
| | ON SAME SHEET DON'T MATCH ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE |
| | REVISED SURVEY SUBMITTED. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE DRAINAGE PLAN. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD WAS CHANGED. NO DRAINAGE PLAN |
| | SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT. |
| | 2- COMPONENT & CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | CVR AND DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET A2 DON'T MATCH. |
| | IN ADDITION, IT LOOKS LIKE THE DESIGN PRESSURES ON |
| | SHEET CVR ARE GIVEN IN NOMINAL DESIGN WIND SPEEDS |
| | (ASD), WHILE THE DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET A2 ARE GIVEN |
| | IN ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEEDS (VULT). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH AND PROVIDE ALL DESIGN PRESSURES IN |
| | NOMINAL WIND SPEEDS (ASD) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R301.2.1.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. THIS WILL AVOID CONFLICTS |
| | ALSO. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)ENGINEER OF RECORD WAS CHANGED.DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN |
| | FOR THE HORIZONTAL ROLLING WINDOWS SEEMS TO BE TOO LOW |
| | BASED ON THE BUILDING EXPOSURE. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING WHY THEY ARE SO LOW. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. ALSO, CLARIFY WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | HORIZONTAL ROLLING WINDOW LOCATED IN BEDROOM #2 ARE THE |
| | SAME IF THIS WINDOW SEEMS TO BE LOCATED IN ZONE 5. |
| | (NOTE: ACCORDING TO FIGURE R301.2(7) THE MINIMUM |
| | DISTANCE FOR ZONE 5 IS 4'-0") |
| | |
| | B)NEW ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO |
| | CLARIFY WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE HORIZONTAL |
| | ROLLING WINDOWS ARE DIFFERENT THAN DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS?. DESIGN PRESSURES ARE BASED ON |
| | EFFECTIVE WIND AREA NOT TYPE OF WINDOW. SEC. 107.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) DESIGN PRESSURES FOR OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR ARE NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND COORDINATE WITH ITEMS |
| | @(A) AND 2(B) ABOVE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- REVISE DOORS AND WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON |
| | THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A1 AND A2 FOR LIVING |
| | ROOM WINDOW AND BEDROOM #2 WINDOW. THEY ARE LOCATED IN |
| | END ZONE "B" NOT INTERIOR ZONE "A". FIGURE R301.2(7) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL REQUIRES 4-MIN FOR END ZONE. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH RESPONSES TO ITEM #2 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 4- OK. |
| | |
| | 5- OK. |
| | |
| | 6- OK. |
| | |
| | 7- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS WAS NOT SPECIFIED. SPECIFY SIZE. |
| | |
| | 9-OK. |
| | |
| | 10- OK. |
| | |
| | 11- OK. |
| | |
| | 12- OK. |
| | |
| | 13- OK. |
| | |
| | 14- OK. |
| | |
| | 15- OK. |
| | |
| | 16- OK. |
| | |
| | 17- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)THE BUILDING'S OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER |
| | AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER SHALL |
| | CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | CODE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. OWNER OR LEGALLY |
| | AUTHORIZED AGENT TO CERTIFY AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT DONE AND NOW IS MISSING MORE INFORMATION LIKE |
| | PERMIT OFFICE, JURISDICTION NUMBER. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | C) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) REVISE ITEM #9(B). THE MATERIAL OF ADJACENT WALL |
| | FRAME IS NOT WOOD. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT DONE. |
| | |
| | E)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F)WINDOWS FRAME MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 4 |
| | DOESN'T MATCH PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT DONE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | G)NUMBER OF BEDROOMS SHOWN ON PAGE 1 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | H)DUCTS R-VALUE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 1 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | I)NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 NEED TO |
| | BE REVISED. COORDINATE WITH REVISE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #17(G) ABOVE. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | J)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| | SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 18- PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL BE REVIEWED ONCE THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES ARE CLARIFIED. SEE COMMENT #2 ABOVE. NOTE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | NOTE: SHUTTERS NEED COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE |
| | CITY SAMPLE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES NEED TO BE REVISED AGAIN. SEE COMMENT |
| | #2. |
| | NOTE: IT LOOKS LIKE HORIZONTAL ROLLING WINDOWS FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FL14994-R4 SUBMITTED DON'T MEET THE |
| | REQUIRED DESIGN PRESSURES. SAME THING APPLIES FOR SOME |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. SEE ALL WINDOW SIZES SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS AND DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND |
| | APPROVE PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 19- OK. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | 20- PROVIDE OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK |
| | DETAIL. SEC. 301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PLANS DON'T SHOW |
| | ANY DETAIL. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
