| Date |
Text |
| 2019-01-23 08:40:49 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | PLAN REVIEW IN PROGESS |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. FBC 107, CHANGES MADE ARE NOT CLEAR. IN COMPARING |
| | WITH THE ISSUED PERMIT DOCUMENTS, IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| | DELTA DATE WAS CHANGED BUT NO ADDITIONAL CHANGES MADE |
| | ON MOST SHEETS. SOME PAGES APPEAR TO BE NEW, BUT |
| | NOTHING ON THE PAGE INDICATES THAT THEY ARE NEW SHEETS. |
| | THE NARRATIVE DESCRIBES CHANGES WHICH I WAS UNABLE TO |
| | LOCATE. |
| | |
| | A. FBC 107, REMOVE PAGES WHICH WERE NOT REVISED. |
| | |
| | B. REVISE NARRATIVE TO ACCURATELY DESCRIBE CHANGES MADE |
| | TO THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | C. ANY NEW SHEETS SHOULD HAVE A CLOUD AROUND THE SHEET, |
| | DELTA TO STATE "NEW SHEET". |
| | |
| | D. OTHER CHANGES SHOULD BE SHOWN WITH CLOUDS AND A |
| | DELTA 2 FOR ALL PAGES WHICH WERE ISSUED WITH A DELTA 1. |
| | |
| | 2. FBC B 703.2, SHEETS A9.2, A9.3, PENETRATION AND |
| | FIRESTOPPING DETAILS WERE PROVIDED, SOME WITH THE TITLE |
| | "ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT FIRESTOP DETAIL". |
| | |
| | A. PER FS471, REVISE LANGUAGE OR HAVE PAGES PREPARED, |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY AN ENGINEER (PER FLORIDA STATUTE, |
| | AN ARCHITECT CANNOT USE THE WORD "ENGINEERING"). |
| | |
| | B. SEE FBC B 703.2, FBC B 714.3,1.1, 714.4.1.2, TESTED |
| | ASSEMBLIES ARE REQUIRED (APPLICABLE TO ALL DETAILS |
| | WHICH ARE NOT TESTED ASSEMBLIES). FBC 104.11, |
| | ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS, DESIGN AND METHODS CAN BE |
| | PROPOSED AND ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. AN ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL, DESIGN OR METHOD OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE APPROVED WHERE THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN IS SATISFACTORY |
| | AND COMPLIES WITH THE INTENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS |
| | CODE, AND THAT THE MATERIAL, METHOD OR WORK OFFERED IS, |
| | FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED, AT LEAST THE EQUIVALENT OF |
| | THAT PRESCRIBED IN THIS CODE IN QUALITY, STRENGTH, |
| | EFFECTIVENESS, FIRE RESISTANCE, DURABILITY AND SAFETY. |
| | |
| | SEE FBC 1044.11.1 AND .2 FOR DOCUMENTS REQUIRED: |
| | |
| | WHEN ALTERNATE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED, THE |
| | SFPE ENGINEERING GUIDE TO PERFORMANCE- |
| | BASED FIRE PROTECTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDINGS, |
| | OR OTHER METHODS APPROVED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY BE USED. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | SHALL REQUIRE THAT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OR PROOF |
| | BE SUBMITTED TO SUBSTANTIATE ANY CLAIM MADE REGARDING |
| | THE ALTERNATIVE. |
| | 104.11.1 RESEARCH REPORTS. SUPPORTING DATA, WHERE |
| | NECESSARY TO ASSIST IN THE APPROVAL |
| | OF MATERIALS OR ASSEMBLIES NOT SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED |
| | FOR IN THIS CODE, SHALL CONSIST OF VALID |
| | RESEARCH REPORTS FROM APPROVED SOURCES. |
| | 104.11.2 TESTS. WHENEVER THERE IS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE |
| | OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS |
| | OF THIS CODE, OR EVIDENCE THAT A MATERIAL OR METHOD |
| | DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THIS CODE, OR IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE CLAIMS FOR |
| | ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS OR METHODS, THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE |
| | TESTS AS EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE TO BE |
| | MADE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE JURISDICTION. TEST METHODS |
| | SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE OR |
| | BY OTHER RECOGNIZED TEST STANDARDS. IN THE ABSENCE OF |
| | RECOGNIZED AND ACCEPTED TEST |
| | METHODS, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL APPROVE THE |
| | TESTING PROCEDURES. TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED |
| | BY AN APPROVED AGENCY. REPORTS OF SUCH TESTS SHALL BE |
| | RETAINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR |
| | THE PERIOD REQUIRED FOR RETENTION OF PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
