| Date |
Text |
| 2019-01-15 16:49:42 | 01/17/19 TALKED TO DAVID PORTER (ARCH) TO GO OVER |
| | DRAINAGE COMMENTS. HE SAID SITE PLAN IS CORRECT. SURVEY |
| | NEEDS TO BE REVISED BECAUSE THERE IS AN EASEMENT ON THE |
| | SOUTH SIDE FOR CITY USE. JG. |
| | |
| | |
| | 01/15/19 REVISED COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1- SHEET AS-1 SITE PLAN SUBMITTED: |
| | A) REVISE DRAINAGE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN. SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AT THE SOUTH |
| | BOUNDARY DON'T MATCH SURVEY SUBMITTED. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)DRIVEWAY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOESN'T MATCH |
| | DRIVEWAY SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUBMITTED. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE SURVEY WITH SURVEYORS ORIGINAL SEAL AND |
| | SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 F.S. OR SUBMIT |
| | SURVEY WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | 3- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A)WALL INSULATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | B)PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE OWNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON PERFORMING THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R405.4.2.1 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D) IT LOOKS LIKE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE (10 PEOPLE) IS |
| | NOT CORRECT AND IS A LITTLE BIT HIGH FOR A SINGLE |
| | FAMILY RESIDENCE OF 4 BEDROOMS. REVISE THE NUMBER OF |
| | OCCUPANTS OR PROVIDE JUSTIFICATIONS OF WHY CONSIDERING |
| | 10 PEOPLE IN THESE CALCULATIONS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) EXTERIOR DOORS ORIENTATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. EVEN |
| | IF DOING CALCULATIONS FOR WORST CASE SCENARIO. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | (NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS MAY BE DONE FOR WORST CASE |
| | SCENARIO WHEN BUILDING A MODEL ON MULTIPLE |
| | ORIENTATIONS. CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT DONE FOR |
| | WORST CASE SCENARIO. THEREFORE, IT NEEDS TO-MATCH THE |
| | ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING). |
| | |
| | F)WINDOWS INFORMATION IS INCORRECT. REVISE THE WINDOW |
| | ORIENTATION (WORST CASE SCENARIO?), WINDOW AREA AND |
| | WINDOW OVERHANG SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | G) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S INFORMATION SHOWING THE |
| | WINDOWS EFFICIENCIES SPECIFIED ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.3 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE SHGC FACTOR |
| | SPECIFIED IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 4- UNABLE TO SEE SOIL TEST REPORT. IT WAS NOT UPLOADED. |
| | PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT. SEC. R401.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION WAS |
| | UPDATED TO $179,082 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $1,734.60. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
