| Date |
Text |
| 2019-05-06 09:34:00 | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC 2014, BUILDING |
| | |
| | COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS TWO REVIEWS: |
| | |
| | 5) NOT COMPLIED. SIGNED AND SEALED CALCULATIONS AS |
| | REQUESTED WERE NOT PROVIDED. SUBMIT THE TEST REPORTS OF |
| | THE FOAM FOR THE FLAME SPREAD AND SMOKE DEVELOPED (ASTM |
| | E84 OR UL 723). PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE PLANS OF HOW THE |
| | FOAM WILL BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE AS REQUIRED BY FBC |
| | 603.1. |
| | STRUCTURAL FOAM FILL IS SHOWN ON SHEET P2.2 BELOW THE |
| | POOL. IT APPEARS THAT THIS FOAM WILL BE SUPPORTING THE |
| | POOL. SUBMIT THE PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS FOAM |
| | WITH SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERED CALCULATIONS TO SHOW |
| | THAT THE STRUCTURAL FOAM WILL SUPPORT THE FILLED POOL. |
| | FBC 107.2.1.2 NOTE: FOAM IN TYPE I AND II BUILDINGS IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE. FBC 603.1 |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW: |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE POOL CONTRACTOR STATES |
| | THAT CALCULATIONS ARE ATTACHED. EXHIBIT A STRUCTURAL |
| | FOAM CALC WAS NOT PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER, FS471. AS |
| | DELEGATED ENGINEERING, THE CALCULATIONS SHOULD BE |
| | PREPARED BY THE POOL ENGINEER AND REVIEWED BY |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | THE FOAM SPECS STATE THAT AN ASTM TEST WILL BE DONE |
| | UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE ORDER. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | ***THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO - THE |
| | NANAWALL IS SHOWN AS A POOL BARRIER. THIS IS NOT A |
| | COMPLIANT POOL BARRIER; ARCHITECT AND OWNER HAVE BEEN |
| | ADVISED REGARDING THIS ISSUE*** |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
