| Date |
Text |
| 2018-12-21 13:06:39 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 |
| | 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. |
| | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 |
| | 6TH EDITION |
| | FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 |
| | 6TH EDITION |
| | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED |
| | SATISFACTORILY ARE MARKED AS CORRECTED. PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SATISFACTORILY |
| | HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES. ANY NEW |
| | COMMENTS WILL BE LISTED AFTER PREVIOUS COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1. CORRECTED. |
| | 2. CORRECTED. |
| | 3. CORRECTED. |
| | 4. CORRECTED. |
| | 5. CORRECTED. |
| | 6. CORRECTED. |
| | 7. CORRECTED. |
| | 8. PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATION FOR SERVICE, INCLUDE |
| | EXISTING AND NEW LOADS TO CONFIRM CAPACITY OF SERVICE |
| | IS ADEQUATE. NEC 215.2, 220, 408.30 (NOT PROVIDED. |
| | SERVICE LOAD FOR THIS PROJECT AND FOR ENTIRE SERVICE, |
| | AND SIZE OF EXISTING SERVICE MUST BE CONFIRMED FOR |
| | APPROVAL.)(3RD REVIEW: THE TOTAL LOAD CALCULATION FOR |
| | THE SERVICE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THIS PROJECT AND THE |
| | LOAD CALCULATION ON PLAN ARE FOR 539 CLEMATIS. HOWEVER, |
| | THE SERVICE FEEDERS ALSO FEED 537 CLEMATIS, AND A LOAD |
| | CALCULATION INCLUDING THOSE LOADS MUST BE PROVIDED. IN |
| | REFERENCE TO THE LOAD CALCULATION FOR THIS PROJECT, |
| | PANEL PP1 SHOWS A DEMAND FACTOR OF 80% FOR AC |
| | EQUIPMENT. PROVIDE CODE SECTION THAT PERMITS THIS |
| | REDUCTION IN LOAD, OR CORRECT LOAD CALCULATION TO |
| | INCLUDE 125% OF THE CONTINUOUS LOAD AND 100% OF THE |
| | NON-CONTINUOUS LOAD PER CODE. ADDITIONALLY, RISER |
| | DIAGRAM SHOWS PANEL RP-B BEING FED FROM PANEL RP-A. |
| | HOWEVER, THERE IS NO LOAD SHOWN IN PANEL RP-A FOR PANEL |
| | RP-B. THERE IS LOAD SHOWN FOR PANEL RP-IG, BUT THE |
| | RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS THIS FED FROM GUTTER. CLARIFY |
| | AND/OR CORRECT.) |
| | 9. CORRECTED. |
| | 10. PROVIDE CORRECTED RISER DIAGRAM, SHOWING ALL |
| | DETAILS OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT, UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD |
| | SERVICE, WIRE AND BREAKER SIZES FOR SERVICE AND FEED TO |
| | ANY SUB-PANEL(S). SHOW GEC SIZE AND SYSTEM, SHOW |
| | INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POINT. RISER PROVIDED |
| | DOES NOT SHOW WIRE SIZES TO MAIN AND GUTTER AND DOES |
| | NOT SHOW SIZE OF MAIN. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 215.5, |
| | 230, 250.50, 250.94, 408.30 (NOT PROVIDED, REQUIRED FOR |
| | APPROVAL.)(3RD REVIEW: IN ADDITION TO THE ITEMS |
| | MENTIONED IN COMMENT 8 ABOVE, THERE NEEDS TO BE FURTHER |
| | CORRECTIONS TO THE RISER DIAGRAM. AFTER SITE VISIT, I |
| | SEE THAT THERE IS NOT A "EXISTING SERVICE END BOX" AS |
| | SHOWN ON PLAN. THE FPL FEED GOES DIRECTLY INTO A LINE |
| | GUTTER. THERE IS A DISCONNECT AND METER FOR 537 |
| | CLEMATIS MOUNTED AT THE LOCATION OF THIS LINE GUTTER, |
| | BUT I DID NOT SEE THE 600 AMP MAIN THAT IS STATED IN |
| | RISER DIAGRAM. WHERE IS THIS MAIN LOCATED? IS IT INSIDE |
| | THE ELECTRICAL ROOM AND FEEDS ANOTHER GUTTER? ARE |
| | PANELS RP-A AND RP-B FED AS A TAP FROM THIS GUTTER, OR |
| | ARE THERE MAINS AHEAD OF THEM? THE PANELS ARE SHOWN AS |
| | MAIN LUG ONLY. NEED CLARIFICATION AND/OR CORRECTION.) |
| | 11. AIC DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ACCEPTED. |
| | 12. CORRECTED. |
| | 13. CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | 14. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT SOME OF THESE COMMENTS HAVE |
| | NOT BEEN ADDRESSED FOR THREE REVIEWS. IF UPON THE NEXT |
| | REVIEW, IF IT IS NECESSARY TO REJECT THE SUBMITTED PLAN |
| | AGAIN FOR THE SAME REASONS, AN ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | IS REQUIRED. FLORIDA STATUTES STATE: WITH RESPECT TO |
| | EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A |
| | LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO |
| | ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND |
| | ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY |
| | THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A |
| | CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN |
| | EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, |
| | FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. FS 553.80(2)(B) |
| | THE ADDITIONAL FEE FOR THIS PROJECT WOULD BE |
| | $20,530.32. |
| | |
| | END OF COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY |
| | REVIEWED SHEETS. ONE COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED |
| | SHEETS SHOULD REMAIN IN PACKAGE AND BE MARKED OLD |
| | SHEETS. |
| | |
| | SINCERELY, |
| | |
| | JOHN PEARSON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6746 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
