| Date |
Text |
| 2019-07-03 17:04:39 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1) REVISED COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE COMMENT |
| | RESPONSE IN ADDITION TO THE LETTER PROVIDED BY AARON |
| | KNIGHT, DATED APRIL 25, 2019, AS WELL AS THE ENLARGED |
| | UNIT PLANS AND ENLARGED ELECTRICAL PLANS AND HAS THE |
| | FOLLOWING COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | A. YOU MAY PROVIDE A "SECONDARY KITCHEN" PROVIDED THAT |
| | THERE ARE NO RANGES/COOK TOPS OR OVENS IN THE SECONDARY |
| | KITCHEN. STAFF NOTED THAT THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DO |
| | NOT SHOW THESE COOKING FACILITIES IN THE SECONDARY |
| | KITCHENS IN UNITS G, H OR I (UNIT E IS STATED IN THE |
| | LETTER AS HAVING A SECONDARY KITCHEN, BUT NONE SHOWN ON |
| | THE UNIT PLAN), SO THIS IS PERMITTED BY THE ZONING |
| | CODE. PLEASE NOTE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THESE UNITS |
| | DOES SHOW A "COOK TOP" ON THE ELECTRICAL PANEL, WITH |
| | THE ASSOCIATED OUTLET, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED AND MAY |
| | NOT BE INSTALLED, AND THE MECHANICAL PLANS SHOW |
| | RECIRCULATING HOODS WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED AND MAY NOT |
| | BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | B. SHEET A-229A SHOWS AN OVEN/RANGE IN THE SECONDARY |
| | KITCHEN, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED AS THIS IS THE SECOND |
| | SET OF COOKING FACILITIES IN THE PENTHOUSE UNIT. NOTE: |
| | SHEET E-229 SHOWS A "COOK TOP" IN THE ELECTRICAL PANEL |
| | FOR THE SECONDARY KITCHEN; HOWEVER, THE OUTLET IS NOT |
| | SHOWN WHERE THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SHOWS THE |
| | NON-PERMITTED OVEN/RANGE IS SHOWN. THE SECOND |
| | OVEN/RANGE NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS AND THE |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 2) NEW COMMENT: ON SHEET A114 THE "TOTAL PROVIDED |
| | PARKING COUNT" TABLE (LOWER LEFT CORNER OF SHEET) NOW |
| | LISTS 183 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED BASED ON CHANGING THE |
| | MIX OF PARKING SPACES. THE "PARKING PROVIDED" TABLE |
| | (TOP MIDDLE OF SHEET) CONTINUES TO LIST 184 PARKING |
| | SPACES PROVIDED. ALL TABLES MUST LIST CORRECT, |
| | CONSISTENT INFORMATION. NOTE THERE ARE 18 BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 3) NEW COMMENT: ON SHEET A114 THE NEW PARKING LAYOUT |
| | CHANGED (NO CLOUDING OF PLANS PROVIDED) AND STAFF NOTED |
| | THE FOLLOWING ISSUES: |
| | |
| | A. PARKING SPACE #8 IS NO LONGER DESIGNATED ON THE |
| | PLANS AND NO DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT IT |
| | MEETS MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | B. PARKING SPACE #9 DOES NOT FUNCTION DUE TO THE COLUMN |
| | AT ITS HEAD MAKING THE SPACE LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 16 |
| | FEET IN DEPTH (FOR A COMPACT SPACE) DUE TO THE |
| | ELIMINATION OF THE WHEEL STOP OVERHANG. NOTE: THIS IS |
| | DIFFERENT FROM HOW IT APPEARS ON SHEETS A-101 AND |
| | A-101A |
| | C. PARKING SPACE #26 IS NO LONGER DESIGNATED ON THE |
| | PLANS AND NO DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT IT |
| | MEETS MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | D. PARKING SPACE #29 CHANGED FROM A COMPACT SPACE TO A |
| | REGULAR SPACE; HOWEVER THE STRIPING AT THE PARKING |
| | SPACE WAS NOT CORRECTED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | E. PARKING SPACE #58, #95 AND #96 NO LONGER EXIST. DID |
| | THE SHIFT TO WHERE THE OLD SPACE #96 WAS? THE PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING IS UNCLEAR ON THE PLANS. NO DIMENSIONS FOR WHAT |
| | APPEAR TO BE THE NEW SPACES IS PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO |
| | VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE, THIS INCLUDES THE AISLE WIDTH |
| | AT THIS LOCATION. NOTE: SHEET A-101A PARKING SPACE |
| | DEPTH DIFFERS FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON SHEET A114. |
| | |
| | 4) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE GRAND TOTAL GBA |
| | GROUND LEVEL AREA SHOWN ON SHEET A114 INCREASED FROM |
| | 47,179 SF ON VERSION 2 OF THE PLANS TO 47,611 SF ON |
| | VERSION 3 OF THE PLANS. STAFF WAS NOT ABLE TO SEE ANY |
| | INCREASE IN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, NOR WAS CLOUDING |
| | USED TO HIGHLIGHT CHANGES. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
