| Date |
Text |
| 2018-08-02 14:33:52 | 08/02/18 MET WITH MIKE. HE SUBMITTED REVISED ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATES AND PROVISO PRODUCT APPROVALS. JG. |
| | |
| | |
| | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ELEVATION CERTIFICATE AND PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTAL SECOND BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- PERMIT WAS ISSUED BASED ON PLANS SHOWING THE FINISH |
| | FLOOR ELEVATION OF 8'-6" FOR THE MAIN HOUSE, 7'-6" FOR |
| | THE GARAGE, 8'-0" FOR THE CABANA AND 7'-6" FOR ALL |
| | EQUIPMENT. FINAL ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED BY THE SURVEYOR ON 6/6/18 SHOWS MAIN HOUSE |
| | FINISH FLOOR AT 7.4 FEET, GARAGE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION |
| | AT 6.4 FEET. FINAL FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS DON'T MATCH |
| | APPROVED PLANS AND DON'T COMPLY WITH THE CITY FLOOD |
| | MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE AT THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE |
| | (SEC. 94-546). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY COMPLIED. FINAL SURVEY AND ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATES WERE REVISED. ARCHITECT OF RECORD ALSO |
| | NEEDS TO REVISE PLANS TO REFLECT THE NEW FINISH FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION FOR MAIN HOUSE, GARAGE CABANA AND ALL |
| | EQUIPMENT. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ELEVATION CERTIFICATES |
| | TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ITEM |
| | #2 BELOW. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- THERE WERE NO REVISIONS SUBMITTED INDICATING THAT |
| | THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS WERE CHANGED. THE FLOOD |
| | INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) DATED 03/01/1979 IDENTIFIES |
| | THIS PROPERTY TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE A5 WITH A BASE FLOOD |
| | ELEVATION OF 7 FEET USING THE 1929 NGVD ELEVATION |
| | DATUM. CITY ORDINANCE REQUIRED THE FINISHED FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION TO BE RAISED 6" ABOVE THE BASED FLOOD |
| | ELEVATION. THIS HOUSE DOESN'T'T COMPLY WITH THE CITY |
| | FLOOD MANAGEMENT SEC. 94-546. PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED |
| | BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE MAIN HOUSE FINISH FLOOR |
| | NEEDS TO BE RAISED AT LEAST 6 INCHES ABOVE BASED FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION (7'-6" MIN. TOTAL) AND THE GARAGE FINISH |
| | FLOOR NEED TO HAVE FLOOD VENTS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R322.2.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED FOR FLOOD VENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. PLANS WERE NOT REVISED AND SINCE GARAGE |
| | FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION IS BELOW THE BASED FLOOD |
| | ELEVATION NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE |
| | FLOOD VENTS. PROVIDE PLANS /SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING THE |
| | FLOOD VENTS AND PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR FLOOD |
| | VENTS. NEED REVISED PLANS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R322.2.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT |
| | OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- THE GARAGE IS A SEPARATE STRUCTURE. IT IS NOT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE HOUSE. THERE ARE THREE STRUCTURES IN |
| | THIS PROPERTY: MAIN HOUSE, GARAGE AND CABANA. PROVIDE |
| | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WITH COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR |
| | EACH STRUCTURE INCLUDING THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF |
| | ALL EQUIPMENT. SEC. R322.1 AND SEC. R322.1.6 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEMI COMPLIED. ELEVATION CERTIFICATE FOR EACH STRUCTURE |
| | WAS PROVIDED. NEED TO REVISE THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) THE GARAGE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS BELOW THE |
| | BASED FLOOD ELEVATION. THEREFORE, NEED TO PROVIDE FLOOD |
| | VENTS ON DIFFERENT WALLS. NEED REVISED PLANS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R322.2.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: ELEVATION CERTIFICATE NEED TO BE |
| | REVISED ONCE THE FLOOD VENTS ARE INSTALLED. |
| | (2) SURVEYOR TO CLARIFY WHY THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE |
| | IS THE SAME FOR ALL THREE STRUCTURES IF THEY ARE |
| | SEPARATED. |
| | (3) PROVIDE THE CORRECT BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR EACH |
| | STRUCTURE. NOTE: ONLY THE GARAGE IS LOCATED BETWEEN |
| | ELEVATION 6 AND 7. THE OTHER STRUCTURES ARE LOCATED IN |
| | ELEVATION 7 OR 8 RESPECTIVELY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | (4) PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION IN ITEM #A4: NOT ALL OF |
| | THEM ARE RESIDENTIAL. CLEARLY IDENTIFY EACH STRUCTURE |
| | TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. FOR EXAMPLE: RESIDENTIAL- |
| | MAIN HOUSE, RESIDENTIAL-GARAGE AND RESIDENTIAL-CABANA. |
| | THIS INFORMATION WAS WRITTEN UNDER THE OWNER?S NAME. |
| | WHICH IS NOT THE CORRECT PLACE FOR THIS INFORMATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED AND CHANGE THE NAME OF KITCHEN FOR |
| | CABANA AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- SECTION B OF THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE NEEDS TO BE |
| | FILLED ON THE BASIS OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP |
| | (FIRM) IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF CERTIFICATION. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. NOTE: PROVIDE CONVERSION FROM NGVD 1929 TO |
| | NAVD 1988 WHICH IS THE CURRENT ELEVATION DATUM TO BE |
| | USED. SEE FEMA ELEVATION CERTIFICATE AND INSTRUCTIONS |
| | 2015 EDITION FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | ELEVATION CERTIFICATES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEMI COMPLIED. SURVEYOR NEEDS TO PROVIDE THE CONVERSION |
| | NUMBERS OF THE ELEVATIONS FROM NGVD 1929 TO NAVD 1988. |
| | THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE COMMENTS OF SECTION |
| | D. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- PROVIDE FINAL SURVEY AFTER HOUSE FINISH FLOOR IS |
| | RAISED AND FLOOD VENTS ARE INSTALLED. SEC. R322.1.10 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ALSO, SHOW THE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR |
| | ZONING COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEMI-COMPLIED. SURVEY DOESN?T SHOW THE FINISH FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION OF THE CABANA AND ALL THE EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | 6-- SURVEYOR'S RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT |
| | WILL HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING ARE THE COMMENTS FOR ITEMS PENDING ON |
| | PROVISO DATED 06/07/18 FOR REVISION #16110786: |
| | |
| | 1- FLAT ROOF FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL5680-R5 |
| | SUBMITTED: PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR SELECTED ASSEMBLY W-55 AS REQUIRED BY |
| | NOTE #8 ON PAGE 2 OF 76. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS INFORMATION WAS NEVER SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A)ENTRY DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | MIKE SWAN SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH THE INITIALS |
| | OF Y.G. DATED 01/26/18. THESE ARE NOT MY INITIALS. THIS |
| | PRODUCT WAS NOT APPROVED BY ME. IF THE INTENTION IS TO |
| | APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH ENGINEER?S ORIGINAL |
| | SEAL AND SIGNATURES AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S. |
| | (NOTE: SOME PAGES ARE NOT LEGIBLE). ALSO, THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES AND BUILDING EXPOSURE WERE CROSSED OUT AND |
| | REVISED BY HAND (NOT BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE |
| | DOOR). |
| | |
| | B) EXTERIOR DOORS: FRENCH DOORS WITH SIDELITES, GARAGE |
| | SWING DOOR, LAUNDRY ROOM, CABANA BATHROOM AND CABANA |
| | STORAGE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | MIKE SWAN SUBMITTED COPY OF DRAWINGS FOR FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FL165-R1. ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS ON |
| | FILE THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS ALREADY APPROVED BY ME |
| | (ALTHOUGH THE COPY SUBMITTED IS NOT THE ONE WITH THE |
| | CITY STAMP). CLARIFY WHERE ARE THESE DOORS GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED TO VERIFY WHICH OF THE ABOVE LISTED DOORS ARE |
| | MISSING. |
| | |
| | 4- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
