| Date |
Text |
| 2018-11-02 20:59:01 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. A1A STATES THAT THE EXISTING PARKING LOT IS TO |
| | REMAIN. SEE FBC A 202.1, 202.4, PATH OF TRAVEL IS TO BE |
| | ACCESSIBLE. A2 DOES NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE SPACES; A1A |
| | DOES NOT SHOW AN ACCESS AISLE FOR THE "EXISTING |
| | HANDICAP PARKING SPACE". AERIALS APPEAR TO SHOW NO |
| | STRIPING. THERE IS NO RECORD OF A PAVING OR RESTRIPE |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | ALSO PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE "EXISTING RAMP" COMPLIES |
| | WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY AS I WAS UNABLE TO FIND A PERMIT |
| | FOR THIS WORK. IF IT COMPLIES, PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU |
| | HAVE CONFIRMED COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. IF IT DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY, PLEASE REVISE PLAN. |
| | |
| | SEE ALSO PLUMBING COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - SEE FBC A 502.4 AND ADVISORY. THE ACCESS |
| | AISLE IS TO BE THE LENGTH OF THE ACCESSIBLE SPACE PER |
| | 502.3.2 AND IS REQUIRED TO BE LEVEL. THE RAMP |
| | ENCROACHES ONTO THE AREA WHICH SHOULD BE ACCESS AISLE. |
| | ACCESS AISLE IS TOO SHORT. NO DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | THERE IS A STATEMENT THAT THE RAMP COMPLIES AND IS |
| | 1:12. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO INFORMATION REGARDING EDGE |
| | PROTECTION OR RAILINGS (CANNOT DETERMINE IF THEY ARE |
| | REQUIRED AS DIMENSION/RUN NOT PROVIDED), LANDINGS NOT |
| | SHOWN 405.7 (NOTE 60X60 REQUIRED AT TOP WHERE THERE IS |
| | A CHANGE IN DIRECTION). |
| | |
| | PARKING IS NOT CONSIDERED "EXISTING" AS THERE IS NO |
| | PERMIT FOR THE STRIPING. A PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLAN |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED AFTER THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ISSUE IS |
| | RESOLVED. |
| | |
| | 2-4. OK |
| | |
| | 5. ON THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL, INDICATE WHICH |
| | THRESHOLD OPTION IS SELECTED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FBC A 303. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, A SILL RATHER THAN A THRESHOLD WAS |
| | INDICATED. HEIGHT THAT CONTRACTOR MARKED IS 1.376; SEE |
| | FBC A 303.2, .25" MAX VERTICAL CHANGE ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 6. FIXED GLASS PRODUCT APPROVALS - SUBMITTED AND OK |
| | |
| | ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMITTED. DO YOU WANT |
| | FOR THIS TO BE DEFFERED? FBC 107. IF NOT PROVIDED, THIS |
| | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, ROOF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD REQUIRED WITH |
| | ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 7-8. OK |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 9. THE STRUCTURAL PAGES ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED, |
| | FS471. |
| | |
| | 10. A SECOND RAMP IS SHOWN AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, |
| | NEAR THE OUTDOOR COOLER. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT THE |
| | PURPOSE OF THIS RAMP IS. IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE IN |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE; IF NOT IN THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, |
| | THE NOTE IS NOT NECESSARY, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 11. "ROUGH ESTIMATE" APPEARS LOW FBC 109. |
| | |
| | 12. IF THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND FRENCH DOOR ISSUES CAN |
| | BE RESOLVED VIA EMAIL, MEETING, OR TELEPHONE CALL, IT |
| | IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS REVIEW CAN BE PASSED WITH PROVISO |
| | FOR A REVISION. |
