| Date |
Text |
| 2018-09-19 11:39:27 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH ED. |
| | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 |
| | 6TH EDITION |
| | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED |
| | SATISFACTORILY ARE MARKED AS CORRECTED. PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SATISFACTORILY |
| | HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES. ANY NEW |
| | COMMENTS WILL BE LISTED AFTER PREVIOUS COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1. CORRECTED. |
| | 2. CORRECTED. |
| | 3. CORRECTED. |
| | 4. CORRECTED. |
| | 5. CORRECTED. |
| | 6. CORRECTED. |
| | 7. LOAD CALCULATION FOR MAIN PANEL USES A DEMAND FACTOR |
| | THAT IS ONLY PERMITTED FOR THE RECEPTACLE LOAD. |
| | CONTINUOUS LOADS SHOULD BE CALCULATED AT 125% AND |
| | NON-CONTINUOUS LOADS SHOULD BE CALCULATED AT 100%. |
| | PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD CALCULATION FOR MAIN PANEL. ALSO, |
| | THIS PLAN AND THE PLAN FOR THE OTHER UNIT EACH SHOW A |
| | WATER HEATER, BUT ONLY ONE WATER HEATER IS INCLUDED IN |
| | CALCULATION. MAKE SURE TO INCLUDE ALL LOADS. NEC 220; |
| | WPB FBC 107.2.1 (LOAD CALCULATION IS NOT CORRECT. THE |
| | LOAD FOR PANEL PX IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL LOAD FOR |
| | PANEL PTS. PROVIDE CORRECTION AND SEE COMMENT 10 |
| | BELOW.)(3RD REVIEW NOT CORRECTED.) |
| | 8. CORRECTED. |
| | 9. CORRECTED. |
| | 10. WHEN THE LOAD FOR PANEL PX IS ADDED TO PANEL PTS, |
| | THE TRANSFORMER, WIRING, PANEL, AND MAIN BREAKER ARE |
| | ALL UNDERSIZED. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 110.3, 215.2, |
| | 310.15(B)(16), 408.30 (NOT CORRECTED.) |
| | 11. ALL OF THE LOAD FOR PANEL PTS IS NOT INCLUDED IN |
| | THE MAIN SERVICE CALCULATION. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC |
| | 220 (NOT CORRECTED,) |
| | 12. CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | 13. LABEL MAINS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 230.2(E)(1) |
| | AND 230.71. |
| | 14. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT SOME COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED FOR TWO REVIEWS. IF UPON THE THIRD REVIEW, IF |
| | IT IS NECESSARY TO REJECT THE SUBMITTED PLAN A THIRD |
| | TIME FOR THE SAME REASONS, AN ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW IS |
| | REQUIRED. FLORIDA STATUTES STATE: WITH RESPECT TO |
| | EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A |
| | LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO |
| | ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND |
| | ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY |
| | THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A |
| | CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN |
| | EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, |
| | FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. FS 553.80(2)(B) |
| | |
| | END OF COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | SINCERELY, |
| | |
| | JOHN PEARSON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6746 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
