| Date |
Text |
| 2018-05-27 12:16:02 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | NOTE - ALTHOUGH THE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED |
| | WITHOUT A PERMIT, COMMENT LIST REFERS TO IMPROVEMENTS |
| | AS "PROPOSED". AN IMPROVEMENT BECOMES "EXISTING" WHEN A |
| | PERMIT IS ISSUED, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTED, AND FINAL |
| | INSPECTIONS OBTAINED. |
| | |
| | 1. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE TWO IDENTICAL COLLATED |
| | SETS OF DOCUMENTS FOR ISSUANCE. OLD SHEETS (BOTH SETS) |
| | SHOULD BE RETAINED IN THE PACKAGE; PLEASE DO NOT |
| | DISCARD ANY DOCUMENTS. THEY SHOULD BE BOUND TOGETHER |
| | SEPARATELY FROM THE TWO ISSUANCE SETS AND MARKED "VOID" |
| | OR "OLD SHEETS". PLEASE DO NOT STAMP THE PLANS VOID. |
| | |
| | 2. AS THE ORIGINAL PERMIT WAS FOR "TEMPORARY |
| | CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS" WHICH ARE EXEMPT FROM FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUT ACTUAL USE IS AS A BAR |
| | (18021163/18041013), COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING IS REQUIRED. A DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION, |
| | FS481. A SKETCH AND "MODSPACE" DRAWING WERE PROVIDED; |
| | THIS CANNOT BE USED TO DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE. AN |
| | INCOMPLETE "LIFE SAFETY PLAN" WAS SUBMITTED; PLEASE |
| | REVISE THIS PLAN TO ADDRESS COMMENTS, OR HAVE ANOTHER |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PREPARE A PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3. CONTACT PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES, 561-233-5025. |
| | THEY WILL DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT IMPACT FEES ARE |
| | REQUIRED. IF AN IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT IS NOT REQUIRED, |
| | THEY CAN VERIFY THIS VIA EMAIL. IF THEY REQUIRE A |
| | REVIEW, AFTER ALL REVIEWS HAVE PASSED AND PLANS ARE |
| | STAMPED, TAKE THE PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE PLANS |
| | ARE TO BE STAMPED BY THEM AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT |
| | FEES DUE WERE PAID, IF APPLICABLE, ARE TO BE PROVIDED |
| | TO BUILDING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 3. THE DCA APPROVAL WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS PERMIT AND IS |
| | NOT REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED AGAIN. USE IS NOT |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE MODULAR PLAN WHICH SHOWS THIS AS |
| | BUSINESS WITH OFFICES. DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS TO |
| | PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH NEW |
| | USE/OCCUPANCY, FBC CHAPTER 3. |
| | |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS TO DETERMINE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOAD. AS PROPOSED USE IS NOT |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE DCA APPROVAL, MODIFICATIONS MAY BE |
| | REQUIRED IF DCA MODULAR WAS NOT DESIGNED FOR USE AS A |
| | BAR. |
| | |
| | 4. REVISE SITE PLAN OR OTHER PLAN TO SHOW BUILDING TYPE |
| | (FBC CHAPTER 6), BUILDING AREA TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FBC B CHAPTER 5. |
| | |
| | 5. A PLAN WAS PROVIDED; IT APPEARS THAT THE DCA MODULAR |
| | WAS MODIFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING WHAT WORK WAS DONE |
| | TO ADAPT A MODULAR DESIGNED AS BUSINESS TO A BAR, FBC |
| | 107. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE BAR WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH FBC A 902. |
| | |
| | 7. THE PLAN SHOWS A "LIVING AREA"; PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH |
| | CLEARLY SHOWS USE OF ALL SPACES, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 8. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE PROPOSED DECK COMPLIES WITH |
| | FBC ACCESSIBLILITY. ARE THE BOARDS T&G? HOW LARGE ARE |
| | THE GAPS, SEE FBC A 302.3. A STRUCTURAL PLAN WAS |
| | PROVIDED, BUT AN ARCHITECTURAL TYPE PLAN IS REQUIRED TO |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND DECK LAYOUT. |
| | WHICH DIRECTION ARE THE BOARDS INSTALLED AT THE RAMP |
| | TURNS; IT APPEARS THAT THE USER WILL TRAVEL IN BOTH |
| | DIRECTIONS TO MAKE THE TURN, NOT CLEAR HOW BOARDS WILL |
| | COMPLY. |
| | |
| | 9. PROVIDE PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED DECK: FLOOR PLAN, |
| | SECTIONS, DETAIL TO SHOW ELEVATION CHANGE AT DOORS, FBC |
| | 107. |
| | |
| | 10. A VALUE OF $0 WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS REVISION. A |
| | VALUE OF $10K WAS PROVIDED AT TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE |
| | FOR A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER. PROVIDE CONTRACT |
| | AMOUNT, FBC 109. IF AMOUNT EXCEEDS THE AMOUNT IN THE |
| | ICC VALUATION TABLES, A VALUE ADJUSTMENT TO THE TABLES |
| | WILL BE DONE AFTER OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND |
| | BUILDING TYPE ARE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 11. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING, PLEASE SCHEDULE AN |
| | APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-SCREEN TO ENSURE THAT ALL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED IS PROVIDED. IF THIS IS A CHANGE |
| | OF OCCUPANCY (FROM BUSINESS TO ANOTHER OCCUPANCY), |
| | PLEASE ADVISE. |
| | |
| | 12. ALL THREE REVISIONS INDICATE THAT "DECKING DETAIL" |
| | IS INCLUDED IN SCOPE. CLARIFY. THE DECK WHICH CONNECTS |
| | THE STRUCTURES SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON ONE OF THE |
| | REVISIONS OR BE A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 13. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS |
| | FS471. DCA MODULAR PLANS ARE ON FILE WITH THE STATE, SO |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINALS SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED |
| | (DCA PLANS ONLY), BUT THE STATE APPROVED STAMPED PLANS |
| | FROM THE WEBSITE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 14. AN OVERALL LIFE SAFETY PLAN IS REQUIRED, FBC B |
| | CHAPTER 10, WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH EXIT DISCHARGE |
| | (FROM EXIT DOORS, ACROSS THE DECK, TO STAIRS/RAMPS). IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR HOW MANY MEANS OF EGRESS ARE REQUIRED AND |
| | ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS (ONE RAMP OR TWO RAMPS). THE |
| | DECK, IF USED FOR SEATING, IS TO BE INCLUDED. NUMBER OF |
| | OCCUPANTS PER MODULAR, DECK, WHICH NEED TO UTILIZE THE |
| | RAMPS AND STAIRS IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
