| Date |
Text |
| 2018-12-10 11:57:19 | RESIDENTIAL (R2) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- PLANS TO HAVE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFYING ALL SCOPE OF WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT |
| | LIMITED TO WORK ON TENANT FIRE RATED WALLS, FLOOR |
| | CEILING FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY, FIRE RATING OF TENANT |
| | ENTRY DOORS, DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EXTERIOR DOORS AND |
| | WINDOWS, ETC. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS PERMIT #98100735 AND |
| | PROPERTY APPRAISER THERE ARE 12 UNITS TOTAL NOT 13. |
| | PLANS TO SHOW THAT EXISTING OFFICE IS CHANGED TO |
| | APARTMENT/STUDIO. NEED TO TAKE PLANS TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON THE FIRST FLOOR |
| | PLAN SHEET OF DRAWINGS SUBMITTED IS TOO GENERAL. |
| | ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR WORK IN FIRE RATED WALLS, FLOOR |
| | CEILING ASSEMBLIES, ETC. AND, CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL |
| | AREAS OF WORK. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH SCOPE OF WORK |
| | SHOWN CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | 2- IMPACT FEES |
| | UPON APPROVAL OF PLANS ONE SET OF PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED |
| | OUT AND SUBMITTED TO PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT |
| | FEE REVIEW BASED ON THE NUMBER OF UNITS. THE PLANS WITH |
| | THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | MUST BE RETURNED TO THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT BEFORE |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH CAN BE |
| | ISSUED. FOR INFORMATION CALL PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT |
| | FEES AT (561) 233-5025. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS |
| | AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. PLANS SUBMITTED DON'T SPECIFY EXISTING |
| | SIZE AND TYPE OF WINDOWS AND PROPOSED SIZE AND TYPE. |
| | PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION. NEED TO VERIFY |
| | MANUFACTURER'S LARGEST STANDARD SIZE WINDOW. SEE COPY |
| | BELOW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING |
| | BUILDING CODE WHEN REPLACING WINDOWS. ALSO, NEED TO |
| | VERIFY WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICES. SEE SEC. 702.4 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING BELOW. |
| | NOTE: CLARIFY WHY ONLY THE BEDROOM WINDOWS FOR UNIT #5 |
| | ON FIRST FLOOR AND UNIT #12 ON SECOND FLOOR HAVE A |
| | DIFFERENT WINDOW HEIGHT AS THE REST OF THE BEDROOM |
| | WINDOWS. ALSO, THEY DON'T SEEM TO BE THE SAME AS ONES |
| | SHOWN ON APPROVED PERMIT #98100735. (COORDINATE WITH |
| | ITEM #8 BELOW). |
| | |
| | 702.5 EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | WHERE WINDOWS ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY ESCAPE |
| | AND RESCUE OPENINGS IN GROUP R-2 AND R-3 OCCUPANCIES |
| | AND ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES |
| | REGULATED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, RESIDENTIAL, |
| | REPLACEMENT WINDOWS SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 1030.2, 1030.3 AND 1030.5 OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AND SECTIONS |
| | R310.21 AND R310.2.3 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, |
| | RESIDENTIAL ACCORDINGLY, PROVIDED THE REPLACEMENT |
| | WINDOW IS THE MANUFACTURER?S LARGEST STANDARD SIZE |
| | WINDOW THAT WILL FIT WITHIN THE EXISTING FRAME OR |
| | EXISTING ROUGH OPENING. THE REPLACEMENT WINDOW SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE OF THE SAME OPERATING STYLE AS THE |
| | EXISTING WINDOW OR A STYLE THAT PROVIDES FOR AN EQUAL |
| | OR GREATER WINDOW OPENING AREA THAN THE EXISTING |
| | WINDOW. |
| | |
| | WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICES COMPLYING WITH ASTM |
| | F2090 SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR USE ON WINDOWS REQUIRED TO |
| | PROVIDE EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: WINDOW REPLACEMENT ALSO MAY NEED TO COMPLY WITH |
| | THE WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICES SEC. 702.4 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. CLEARLY IDENTIFY ON PLANS |
| | WINDOWS THAT WILL REQUIRE WINDOW OPENING CONTROL |
| | DEVICES. SEE COPY OF SEC. 702.4 BELOW. |
| | |
| | 702.4 WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICES. |
| | IN GROUP R-2 OR R-3 BUILDINGS CONTAINING DWELLING UNITS |
| | AND ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES |
| | REGULATED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, RESIDENTIAL, |
| | WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICES COMPLYING WITH ASTM |
| | F2090 SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE AN EXISTING WINDOW IS |
| | REPLACED AND WHERE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY TO THE |
| | REPLACEMENT WINDOW: |
| | |
| | 1.THE WINDOW IS OPERABLE; |
| | |
| | 2. THE WINDOW REPLACEMENT INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF THE |
| | SASH AND THE FRAME; |
| | |
| | 3.ONE OF THE FOLLOWING APPLIES: |
| | |
| | 3.1.IN GROUP R-2 OR R-3 BUILDINGS CONTAINING DWELLING |
| | UNITS, THE TOP OF THE SILL OF THE WINDOW OPENING IS AT |
| | A HEIGHT LESS THAN 36 INCHES (915 MM) ABOVE THE |
| | FINISHED FLOOR; OR |
| | |
| | 3.2. IN ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES |
| | REGULATED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, RESIDENTIAL, |
| | THE TOP SILL OF THE WINDOW OPENING IS AT A HEIGHT LESS |
| | THAN 24 INCHES (610 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR; |
| | |
| | 4.THE WINDOW WILL PERMIT OPENINGS THAT WILL ALLOW |
| | PASSAGE OF A 4-INCH-DIAMETER (102 MM) SPHERE WHEN THE |
| | WINDOW IS IN ITS LARGEST OPENED POSITION; AND |
| | |
| | 5.THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE TOP OF THE SILL OF THE |
| | WINDOW OPENING TO THE FINISHED GRADE OR OTHER SURFACE |
| | BELOW, ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, IS GREATER THAN |
| | 72 INCHES (1829 MM). |
| | |
| | THE WINDOW OPENING CONTROL DEVICE, AFTER OPERATION TO |
| | RELEASE THE CONTROL DEVICE ALLOWING THE WINDOW TO FULLY |
| | OPEN, SHALL NOT REDUCE THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING |
| | AREA OF THE WINDOW UNIT TO LESS THAN THE AREA REQUIRED |
| | BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTIONS: |
| | |
| | 1.OPERABLE WINDOWS WHERE THE TOP OF THE SILL OF THE |
| | WINDOW OPENING IS LOCATED MORE THAN 75 FEET (22 860 MM) |
| | ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE OR OTHER SURFACE BELOW, ON THE |
| | EXTERIOR OF THE ROOM, SPACE OR BUILDING, AND THAT ARE |
| | PROVIDED WITH WINDOW FALL PREVENTION DEVICES THAT |
| | COMPLY WITH ASTM F2006. |
| | |
| | 2.OPERABLE WINDOWS WITH OPENINGS THAT ARE PROVIDED WITH |
| | WINDOW FALL PREVENTION DEVICES THAT COMPLY WITH ASTM |
| | F2090. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER |
| | AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS): |
| | |
| | A) EXTERIOR DOORS IF REPLACED. PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR IF |
| | DOORS ARE GOING TO BE REPLACED. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH |
| | ITEM #8 BELOW. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS (DOORS, |
| | WINDOWS, ROOFING, ETC) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. REVISE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL LETTER SUBMITTED INCLUDES |
| | EXTERIOR WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS (ROOFING, EXTERIOR LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND |
| | DRIVEWAY). PROVIDE ONLY THE VALUATION FOR WORK WITHIN |
| | THE BUILDING. APPLY FOR THE OTHER PERMITS SEPARATELY. |
| | ALSO, PROPOSAL LETTER SPECIFIES 25 UNITS. CLARIFY # OF |
| | UNITS. NOTE: CONTRACTOR AND ARCHITECT TO COORDINATE |
| | SCOPE OF WORK TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL LETTER INCLUDES NEW FLOORING. |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING FLOORING INFORMATION AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 602.2 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING CODE FOR NEW AND |
| | REPLACEMENT MATERIALS. SEE COPY OF THIS SECTION BELOW. |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS): |
| | |
| | FLOORING SOUND INSULATION MATERIAL: |
| | A) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE FLAME SPREAD INDEX AND SMOKE |
| | DEVELOPED INDEX TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 |
| | OR UL 723 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 720.1 OF FBC 6TH EDITION |
| | (2017). |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS |
| | (STC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.2 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE IMPACT INSULATION CLASS |
| | (IIC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.3 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | NOTE: TEST SAMPLES TO MATCH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND |
| | PROPOSED FLOOR FINISH. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED: |
| | (PLANS WERE NOT REVIEWED EARLIER BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT |
| | PREPARED BY A LICENSED ARCHITECT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 481.229 F.S. AND REQUESTED ON FIST REVIEW) |
| | |
| | 8- PLANS SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH LAST APPROVED PLANS ON |
| | CITY RECORDS PERMIT #98100735 (WHICH HAPPENS TO BE |
| | PERFORMED BY SAME ARCHITECT SUBMITTING PLANS NOW). |
| | THERE ARE NO CITY RECORDS FOR PERMITS TO DO ALTERATIONS |
| | TO THE APPROVED PLANS. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES ON |
| | THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PLANS. FLOOR LAYOUT WAS |
| | CHANGED ON SOME UNITS. ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WORK ON AREAS THAT WERE |
| | CHANGED FROM APPROVED PLANS ON PERMIT #98100735. |
| | INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UNIT #6 NEW EXTERIOR DOOR |
| | ON WEST SIDE, MAIN SINGLE ENTRY DOOR ON EAST SIDE AND |
| | ALL UNITS FLOOR LAYOUTS THAT WERE CHANGED. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | AND SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9- FIRST FLOOR PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS A DOOR AT THE ENTRY |
| | OF STAIRWAY TO SECOND FLOOR. THIS DOOR LOOKS LIKE IS |
| | BLOCKING THE EGRESS FROM RESIDENTS ON SECOND FLOOR. IN |
| | ADDITION NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 1010.1.9.11 |
| | FBC (DOORS) AND SEC. 1011.6 FBC (LANDINGS). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE/VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |