| Date |
Text |
| 2019-03-14 18:17:21 | |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OFFICE/WAREHOUSE STRUCTURE. SECOND |
| | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- IMPACT FEES - PAPER SUBMITTALS |
| | PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL |
| | (561) 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL OF PLANS, YOU MAY CHECK |
| | OUT ONE PLAN SET AND TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED AND WITH A COPY OF THE RECEIPT |
| | AS APPLICABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE |
| | QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. THE |
| | FORM CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/AD |
| | MINISTRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- PROVIDE SITE GRADING PLAN (INCLUDING PROPOSED LOT |
| | DRAINAGE) SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 1804.4 |
| | FBC-BUILDING AND SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: DRAWINGS REFERENCED ON GENERAL SITE NOTE #5 ON |
| | SHEET SP-1 WERE NOT SUBMITTED. ALSO, COORDINATED |
| | DRAWINGS WITH PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEE SHEET SP-1. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A) ONLY ON SET OF CIVIL DRAWINGS WAS SUBMITTED. NEED |
| | TWO COPIES. SEC. 107.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) IT LOOKS LIKE THREE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CIVIL |
| | DRAWINGS AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REGARDING THE |
| | RETENTION WALLS. THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT TYPE OF |
| | RETENTION WALLS. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT. |
| | 3- SHEET LS-1: |
| | A) TYPE III-B CONSTRUCTION TYPE SPECIFIED IN THE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA REQUIRES 2 HR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS. SEE BY TABLE 601 FBC-BUILDING. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE 2 HR FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES "TYPE III-B |
| | CONSTRUCTION AS NOTED WILL ALLOW THE 2-STRY OFFICE. |
| | EXTERIOR WALL SHALL BE 2HR. PROTECTED". THIS DOESN'T |
| | ADDRESS THE REQUIRED 2 HOUR WALL FOR TYPE III |
| | CONSTRUCTION. PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO HOUR CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS. NOT |
| | ALL CONCRETE BLOCK IS TWO HOUR RATED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) SQUARE FEET OF ALLOWED OPENINGS SPECIFIED IN THE |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA DON'T MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED |
| | TO MATCH. SEC. 705.8 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OPENINGS LOCATION WERE REVISED. IT LOOKS LIKE |
| | INFORMATION GIVEN IS FOR THE WEST WALL. IF SO, IS |
| | MISSING THE DOOR OPENING ON THE FIRST FLOOR. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) REVISE THE GENERAL BUILDING LIMITATIONS INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA. TABLE 503 IS INCORRECT. |
| | THIS BUILDING HAS A MIXED OCCUPANCY. NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION FOR EACH OCCUPANCY. USE TABLE 504.3, TABLE |
| | 504.4 AND TABLE 506.2 FBC 2017 FOR CORRECT AND CURRENT |
| | CODE INFORMATION AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS WILL BE REVIEWED BASED ON THE CLARIFICATION |
| | REQUIRED BY ITEM #3(A) ABOVE REGARDING CONSTRUCTION |
| | TYPE. |
| | |
| | E) OK. |
| | |
| | F) OK. |
| | |
| | G) OK. |
| | |
| | 4- OK. |
| | |
| | 5- FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | A) OK |
| | B) OK |
| | C)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH THE VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SECOND STORY OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 201.1.1 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. OR SHOW IN PLANS |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ANY EXCEPTION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES "201.1.1(3) OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD LESS THAN 5 PERSONS: SO NOTED ON THE PLAN". PLANS |
| | DON'T SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS EXCEPTION. THERE ARE |
| | TWO REQUIREMENTS TO MEET THIS EXCEPTION. FIRST OF ALL, |
| | IT NEEDS TO BE CLEAR THAT THE OFFICE IS NOT OPEN TO THE |
| | PUBLIC. THE SECOND REQUIREMENTS IS THAT IT CAN NO HOUSE |
| | MORE THAN 5 PERSONS. ONLY THE SECOND REQUIREMENT WAS |
| | MET BY THE SIZE OF THE OFFICE. IN ORDER TO APPLY THIS |
| | EXCEPTION IT MUST BE CLEARLY NOTED ON PLANS BY THE |
| | OFFICE AREA THAT THE OFFICE CAN NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. |
| | REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | 206-FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PARKING TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE |
| | (SEC. 402 AND SEC. 404 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE BUILDING MAIN ENTRANCE DOESN'T SEEM TO COMPLY. SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CHANGE OF LEVEL AT THE ENTRANCE. |
| | SHOW MANEUVERING CLEARANCES (INCLUDING TURNING |
| | CLEARANCES) AT THE VESTIBULE AREA LEADING TO THE |
| | WAREHOUSE AREA. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | STAIRWAY SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF SEC. 504-FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | INCLUDE THE NOSING SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE NOSING DETAIL ON SHEET A-2. THE UNDERSIDE OF |
| | NOSING NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 504.5 |
| | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- LOCATION OF ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T SEEM TO PROVIDE THE |
| | MIN. 30" CLEAR HEADROOM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1209.2 FBC. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ATTIC ACCESS WAS REMOVED. ATTIC ACCESS IS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 1209.2 FBC. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) OK. |
| | |
| | B) OK. |
| | |
| | 8- OK. |
| | |
| | 9- OK. |
| | |
| | 10- SOIL TEST REPORT: |
| | A) OK. |
| | |
| | B) OK. |
| | |
| | C) OK. |
| | |
| | D) OK. |
| | |
| | 11- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO CERTIFY (SIGNATURE AND |
| | LICENSE NUMBER) ON ENERGY FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | C103.1.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES "CERTIFICATION WITH |
| | NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER SHOWN". ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND LICENSE NUMBER |
| | OF THE ARCHITECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS SUBMITTED, IT |
| | LOOKS LIKE THE ARCHITECT IS DESIGNING THE BUILDING, |
| | ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS. PROVIDE SIGNATURE AND |
| | LICENSE NUMBERS ON EACH TRADE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) REVISE BUILDING ORIENTATION SHOWN ON PAGE 17 OF 22 |
| | TO MATCH PLANS. NOTE: PLANS ARE DRAWN WITH NORTH ARROW |
| | POINTING SOUTH. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | WHY ARE THERE TWO EAST WALLS? |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) REVISE WALL TYPES AND INSULATION INFORMATION SHOWN |
| | ON PAGE 17 OF 22 TO MATCH PLANS. ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION FOR RAISED FLOOR ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR |
| | UNCONDITIONED WAREHOUSE AREA. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH |
| | ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | WHY ARE THERE TWO EAST WALLS?. |
| | PAGE 19 OF 22 DOESN'T SHOW ANY INFORMATION FOR THE |
| | RAISED FLOOR ABOVE WAREHOUSE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | E)PLANS WERE REVISED. LOCATION OF WINDOWS CHANGED. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE SHGC FACTOR |
| | SPECIFIED IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 12- OK. |
| | |
| | 13- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL) |
| | A) OK. |
| | |
| | B) OK. |
| | |
| | 14- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 15- FLAT ROOF NOA 14-0627.05 SUBMITTED: CLEARLY MARK |
| | WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. |
| | 1609.1 FBC. NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY WAS NOT MARKED/IDENTIFIED. APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLIES ARE ON PAGE 5 OF 8 TO PAGE 7 OF 8. NOTE: ALL |
| | THESE ASSEMBLIES ARE FOR ASSEMBLIES WITH INSULATION. |
| | PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY WITH ADDITIONAL |
| | INSULATION. THE INSULATION SHOWN ON PLANS IS FOR |
| | ICYNENE INSULATION SPRAYED AT THE BOTTOM OF ROOD DECK. |
| | IF USING A FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY WITH ADDITIONAL |
| | INSULATION , THEN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NEED TO BE |
| | REVISED SHOWING THE ADDITIONAL INSULATION. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT ( I APOLOGIZE . I FORGOT TO ASK FOR IT ON |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW): |
| | 15(1)- PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR ICYNENE SPRAY |
| | INSULATION SPECIFIED ON PLANS. AND ARCHITECT OF RECORD |
| | TO REVIEW/APPROVE PRIOR T SUBMITTAL. SEC. 2603 FBC. |
| | |
| | 16- OK. |
| | |
| | 17- OK. |
| | |
| | 18- TRUSS PACKAGE: |
| | A)OK. |
| | |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) TRUSS PACKAGE COVER LETTER NEEDS TO PROVIDE THE |
| | INFORMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL DESIGNER OF RECORD AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FAC 61G15-23.003. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE. |
| | NOT RESPONSE. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) TRUSS LAYOUT SHOW THE TRUSS TO TRUSS STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTORS. TRUSS ENGINEER TO SIGN AND SEAL TRUSS |
| | LAYOUT AND PROVIDE HIS INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G15-23.001. OR PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTIONS ON EACH INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. TRUSS LAYOUT SHOW THE FLOOR TRUSS |
| | CONNECTORS RESTING ON THE FLOOR GIRDER. AND THERE ARE |
| | NOT CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON THE INDIVIDUAL TRUSSES |
| | RESTING ON THE HIP GIRDER AND DIAGONAL HIP GIRDER. NOTE |
| | #9 OF INDIVIDUAL TRUSSES STATES THAT "HE |
| | DESIGN/SELECTION OF SUCH CONNECTION DEVICE(S) IS THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHERS". WHY? ISN'T THE TRUSS TO |
| | TRUSS CONNECTIONS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE TRUSS |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD?. ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED NEED TO HAVE THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE |
| | PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. |
| | |
| | E)OK. |
| | |
| | 19- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW REVISED TRUSS PACKAGE, |
| | INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL TRUSSES BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THIS |
| | OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THIS APPLIES ONCE TRUSS PACKAGE ITEMS ARE |
| | CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 20- VALUE DECLARED I THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO LOW. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL |
| | LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $155,360. THE |
| | PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $3250.30. |
| | |
| | 21- WELDED OR BOLTED CONNECTIONS (FYI) |
| | THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE WELD PROCEDURE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS & WELDER OPERATOR PERFORMANCE |
| | QUALIFICATION RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REFERENCED |
| | STANDARDS AT TIME OF INSPECTION. |
| | 2017 FBC-B 2204.1 WELDING |
| | 2017 FBC-B 2204.2 BOLTING. |
| | |
| | 22-PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR |
| | REVISED MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND |
| | REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: ENTER BUILDING INFORMATION ON FRONT SCREEN FIELDS |
| | WHEN PLANS ARE REVISED SHOWING CORRECT CONSTRUCTIOIN |
| | TYPE AND RESUBMITTED. JG. |
| | |
