| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-11 14:42:45 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| | WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH ED. |
| | FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 |
| | 6TH EDITION |
| | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| | NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE DETAIL OF LEVEL OF PATIENT CARE AT THIS |
| | FACILITY NEC 517.40(B); FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 2. FAULT CURRENT FROM MAIN TO ATS IS SHOWN AS 29925 |
| | AMPS. THE ATS IS SHOWN AS RATED FOR 22,000 AIC. PROVIDE |
| | CORRECTION. NEC 110.9 |
| | 3. FEEDER SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE 500 AMP FEEDER |
| | SHOWN ON PLAN. THE FAULT CURRENT CALCULATION SHOWS A |
| | 500 AL CONDUCTOR, WHICH IS NOT RATED FOR 500 AMPS. |
| | PROVIDE ACCURATE FEEDER DESCRIPTION. FBC 107.2.1; NEC |
| | 215.2, 215.5, 310.15(B)(16) |
| | 4. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE METHOD OF CERTIFICATION THAT |
| | WILL BE USED BY A NRTL TO PROVIDE LISTING FOR THE |
| | ALTERED SWITCH GEAR (PANEL MSB). NEC 110.3; FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 5. BY ALTERING THE BUS OF MSB, HOW WILL THIS AFFECT THE |
| | AIC RATING OF THE EQUIPMENT? PROVIDE CLARIFICATION. NEC |
| | 110.3; FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 6. HOW WILL THE 500 AMP FUSE BE INSTALLED IN A 1600 AMP |
| | PIECE OF EQUIPMENT? PANEL MSB IS SHOWN WITH A 1600 AMP |
| | FUSE. OBVIOUSLY, THE FUSE SIZE WOULD BE DIFFERENT. |
| | PROVIDE CLARIFICATION. NEC110.3; FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 7. PROVIDE CONTROL WIRING SCHEMATIC FOR EXISTING |
| | TRANSFER SWITCH TO EXPLAIN THE METHOD OF CONNECTION |
| | DETAILED IN NOTE # 5 ON SHEET E400. AS THE SENSING |
| | MECHANISM IS NORMALLY BUILT INTO A TRANSFER SWITCH, |
| | WHERE WOULD THIS BE TIED IN TO THE NORMAL POWER SO THAT |
| | THERE WOULD BE NO CONFLICT WITH THE NORMAL TRANSFER |
| | SWITCH FEED TO PANEL MSB? WOULD THIS VIOLATE THE |
| | LISTING OF THE EXISTING TRANSFER SWITCH BY RELOCATING |
| | THIS WIRING TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION? PROVIDE |
| | CLARIFICATION. NEC 110.3; FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 8. PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD BREAKDOWN. THE CURRENT |
| | EXPLANATION SHOWS THE NEW NORMAL LOAD TO BE 116 KW AND |
| | THE EMERGENCY LOAD TO BE 113 KW, BUT THE TOTAL PEAK |
| | DEMAND OF ONLY 113 KW. WHAT ARE THE LOADS FOR THE |
| | INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS AND IS THE TOTAL CAPABLE OF BEING |
| | SUPPORTED BY THE NEW GENERATOR? PROVIDE CLARIFICATION. |
| | NEC 517.41(C) |
| | 9. PROVIDE DETAIL OF SEPARATION OF THE LIFE SAFETY |
| | BRANCH THE CRITICAL BRANCH. NEC 517.41(D) |
| | 10. PROVIDE DETAIL OF COMPLIANCE WITH NEC517.42. WILL |
| | THE NORMAL AND ESSENTIAL TRANSFER AT THE SAME TIME, OR |
| | WILL THERE BE A DELAY? SHOW ON PLAN. FBC 107.2.1; NEC |
| | 517.42 |
| | |
| | END OF COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | SINCERELY, |
| | |
| | JOHN PEARSON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6746 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
