| Date |
Text |
| 2018-07-17 09:30:38 | RESIDENTIAL (R2) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | 1 REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FOR APT. #1, |
| | APT. #2 AND APT. #3 (NOTE: COORDINATE INFORMATION ON |
| | ALL 3 APARTMENTS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS): |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM. NEED OWNER'S NAME. NEED CORRECT BUILDER'S NAME. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. NEED CORRECT |
| | NAME OF THE OWNER AND THE BUILDER. |
| | |
| | B)APT #1 AND APT #2: REVISE ATTIC INFORMATION SHOWN ON |
| | PAGE 2 OF 4. THERE IS NO ATTIC ABOVE THIS APARTMENT. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED. THERE IS NOT |
| | ATTIC ABOVE THIS APARTMENT. CONSEQUENTLY THERE IS NOT |
| | VENTED ATTIC EITHER. THERE IS AN APARTMENT ON THE |
| | SECOND FLOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: COORDINATE AND |
| | REVISE INFORMATION ON ITEM #10 ON PAGE 1 OF 4. WHY ONE |
| | APARTMENT HAS INSULATION AND THE OTHER DOESN'T?. |
| | CLARIFY WHY INFORMATION ON APT. # 2 SAYS "NO ATTIC" AND |
| | INFORMATION ON APT #1 SAYS "FULL ATTIC". COORDINATE ALL |
| | INFORMATION TO AVOID UNNECESSARY CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | C)CRAWLSPACE IN APT #1 AND APT #2: : CLARIFY WHY ONE |
| | APARTMENT HAS INSULATION AND THE OTHER DOESN'T?. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)APT #1 AND APT #2: : CLARIFY WHY THE WINDOW U-FACTOR |
| | AND SHGC FACTOR IS DIFFERENT ON EACH APARTMENT. |
| | TYPICALLY CONTRACTOR USES SAME WINDOWS WHEN REPLACING |
| | THEM. IF DIFFERENT WINDOWS ARE USED, THEN CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY EACH WINDOW. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) APT #3: CLARIFY WHY THERE IS NO INSULATION ON ITEM |
| | #8 ON PAGE 1 OF 4. COORDINATE WITH INFORMATION GIVEN ON |
| | APT #1 AND APT #2. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | F)APT #3: REVISE ROOF INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 1 OF 4 |
| | AND PAGE 2 OF 4. ACCORDING TO PLANS THE CEILING JOISTS |
| | ARE 2X6. THEREFORE, R-30 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT. |
| | R-30 BATT INSULATION IS ABOUT 9-1/2" THICK. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | G)APT #3: REVISE ROOF INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. |
| | THERE IS ON GABLE AREA ON A FLAT ROOF. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | H)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD FOR ALL APARTMENTS. SEC. R405.4.3 |
| | FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| | SHGC FACTOR IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR. THIS WILL BE DONE AT |
| | TIME OF INSPECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 2- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVISE INSULATION INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS. R-30 BATT INSULATION IS 9-1/2" +/- |
| | THICK. IT DOESN'T FIT ON ROOF JOIST AND FLOOR JOISTS |
| | SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY FOR TENANT SEPARATION WITH THE |
| | APT ON THE SECOND FLOOR. REPEAT COMMENT. NOTE: TENANT |
| | SEPARATION WALL DETAIL "F" ON SHEET S1A DOESN'T PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLY. IT |
| | ONLY SPECIFIES THE WALL ASSEMBLY UL-U311. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED |
| | HORIZONTAL FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED . SEC. 420.3 |
| | FBC. |
| | |
| | 4-SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE WINDOW |
| | OPENING CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY SEC. 702.4 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | NOTE: PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM |
| | F2090. |
| | |
| | 5- ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, |
| | AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | SOUND TRANSMISSION FOR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY. |
| | FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT |
| | SOUND INSULATION MATERIAL: |
| | A) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE FLAME SPREAD INDEX AND SMOKE |
| | DEVELOPED INDEX TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 |
| | OR UL 723 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 720.1 OF FBC 6TH EDITION |
| | (2017). |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS |
| | (STC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.2 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE IMPACT INSULATION CLASS |
| | (IIC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.3 OF FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | 6-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF |
| | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF |
| | SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY |
| | PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. ENGINEER TO SPECIFY FASTENING. THIS IS NOT BY |
| | OTHERS. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL, BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION (NO FEES). |
| | |
| | A) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. 1609 FBC. NOTE: IF THE |
| | SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF TILE. |
| | |
| | C) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD. AND SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. |
| | |
| | 8- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9- BASED ON THE MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, PROVIDE |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE A/C DUCTWORK |
| | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. REMEMBER THAT THERE IS A FIRE |
| | RATED FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY SEPARATING THE APT ABOVE. |
| | SEC. 711 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | NEED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | THE SOFFITS FOR A/C WORK. |
| | |
| | 10- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS ANS SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | REPLACEMENT OF EXTERIOR WOOD STUDS. SPECIFY ALL |
| | CONNECTORS. SEC. 1609.1 FBC. |
| | |
| | 11-ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S1A: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL AT CANOPY ENTRY FOR |
| | APT #2 AND APT #3. IT'S NOT CLEAR HOW THE ROOF IS |
| | SUPPORTED. FRONT ELEVATION CALLS FOR COLUMNS, BUT ROOF |
| | FRAMING DETAIL DOESN'T SPECIFY ANY. SEC. 1609.1 FBC. |
| | |
| | B) LEDGER INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN |
| | DOESN'T MATCH LEDGER INFORMATION SHOWN ON SECTION 1 ON |
| | SAME SHEET. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 12- PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE FIRE RATING |
| | ASSEMBLY BELOW THE STAIRS AND BY THE PANTRY CLOSET ON |
| | FIRST FLOOR KITCHEN. SEC. 420.2 AND 420.3 FBC. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO AVOID PLAN REVIEW FEES AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OF ALREADY |
| | REVIEWED DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
