| Date |
Text |
| 2018-03-01 14:42:23 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ANY FIRE |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | 6TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING |
| | THE 2015 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER |
| | APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE INDICATE COMPLAINCE WITH AN APPLICABLE NOTE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THE OCCUPANCY IS INDICATED AS BUSINESS; HOWEVER, THE |
| | ROOM IS AN ASSEMBLY. IS THE OCCUPANCY MIXED OR |
| | SEPRATED. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 6, |
| | |
| | 6.1.1.1 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. THE OCCUPANCY OF A |
| | BUILDING OR |
| | STRUCTURE, OR PORTION OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, SHALL |
| | BE CLASSIFIED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 6.1.2 THROUGH 6.1.13. OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION SHALL BE |
| | SUBJECT TO THE RULING OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING |
| | JURISDICTION WHERE THERE IS A |
| | QUESTION OF PROPER CLASSIFICATION IN ANY INDIVIDUAL |
| | CASE. |
| | |
| | 6.1.14.2.1 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY. A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE |
| | IN WHICH TWO |
| | OR MORE CLASSES OF OCCUPANCY EXIST. |
| | 6.1.14.2.2 MIXED OCCUPANCY. A MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY WHERE |
| | THE |
| | OCCUPANCIES ARE INTERMINGLED. |
| | 6.1.14.2.3 SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. A MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY |
| | WHERE THE |
| | OCCUPANCIES ARE SEPARATED BY FIRE RESISTANCE?RATED |
| | ASSEMBLIES. |
| | 6.1.14.3 MIXED OCCUPANCIES. |
| | 6.1.14.3.1 EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | CLASSIFIED AS TO ITS USE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.1. |
| | 6.1.14.3.2* THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPANCIES INVOLVED, UNLESS |
| | SEPARATE SAFEGUARDS |
| | ARE APPROVED. |
| | 6.1.14.4 SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES. (SEE ALSO 6.1.14.1.2.) |
| | 6.1.14.4.1 WHERE SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES ARE PROVIDED, |
| | EACH PART OF THE |
| | BUILDING COMPRISING A DISTINCT OCCUPANCY, AS DESCRIBED |
| | IN THIS CHAPTER, |
| | SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES BY |
| | FIRE-RESISTIVE |
| | ASSEMBLIES, AS SPECIFIED IN 6.1.14.4.2, 6.1.14.4.3, |
| | TABLE 6.1.14.4.1(A), |
| | AND TABLE 6.1.14.4.1(B), UNLESS SEPARATION IS PROVIDED |
| | BY APPROVED |
| | EXISTING SEPARATIONS OR AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY |
| | 6.1.14.4.6. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND ENSURE |
| | THE APPLICABLE SEPARATION OR MIXED REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF DOOR HARDWARE TO THIS |
| | ASSEMBLY SPACE. |
| | |
| | PLEAE PROVIDE DETAILS IN COMPLAINCE WITH NFPA 101, |
| | CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS ON EACH EXIT DOOR. |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.5 LOCKS, LATCHES, AND ALARM DEVICES. |
| | 7.2.1.5.1 DOOR LEAVES SHALL BE ARRANGED TO BE OPENED |
| | READILY FROM |
| | THE EGRESS SIDE WHENEVER THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. |
| | 7.2.1.5.2* THE REQUIREMENT OF 7.2.1.5.1 SHALL NOT APPLY |
| | TO DOOR |
| | LEAVES OF LISTED FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES AFTER EXPOSURE TO |
| | ELEVATED |
| | TEMPERATURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LISTING, BASED ON |
| | LABORATORY |
| | FIRE TEST PROCEDURES. |
| | 7.2.1.5.3 LOCKS, IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE |
| | OF A KEY, A |
| | TOOL, OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR OPERATION FROM |
| | THE EGRESS |
| | SIDE. |
| | 7.2.1.5.4 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.1.5.1 AND 7.2.1.5.3 |
| | SHALL NOT |
| | APPLY WHERE OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 18 THROUGH |
| | 23. |
| | 7.2.1.5.5 KEY-OPERATED LOCKS. |
| | 7.2.1.5.5.1* EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO HAVE |
| | KEY-OPERATED LOCKS FROM THE EGRESS SIDE, PROVIDED THAT |
| | ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET: |
| | (1) THIS ALTERNATIVE IS PERMITTED IN CHAPTERS 11 |
| | THROUGH 43 FOR |
| | THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANCY. |
| | (2) A READILY VISIBLE, DURABLE SIGN IN LETTERS NOT LESS |
| | THAN 1 IN. |
| | (25 MM) HIGH ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND THAT READS AS |
| | FOLLOWS IS LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR LEAF: |
| | THIS |
| | DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN THE |
| | BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. |
| | (3) THE LOCKING DEVICE IS OF A TYPE THAT IS READILY |
| | DISTINGUISHABLE |
| | AS LOCKED. |
| | (4) A KEY IS IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO ANY OCCUPANT |
| | INSIDE THE |
| | BUILDING WHEN IT IS LOCKED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) THERE IS NO INDICATION OF MEASURMENT OF THE EXIT |
| | SEPARATION DISTANCE. |
| | |
| | 7.5.1.3.2* WHERE TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT |
| | DISCHARGES ARE |
| | REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED AT A DISTANCE FROM ONE |
| | ANOTHER NOT |
| | LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL |
| | DIAGONAL |
| | DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE SERVED, |
| | MEASURED IN A |
| | STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST EDGE OF THE EXITS, |
| | EXIT ACCESSES, OR |
| | EXIT DISCHARGES, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.5.1.3.3 |
| | THROUGH |
| | 7.5.1.3.5. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
