| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-09 09:44:36 | NEW CAR WAS STRUCTURE, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1) THE COVERSHEET OF THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS IS DATED |
| | 12/18/2017 IN THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS THERE IS NO |
| | REFERENCE TO WHAT PLANS THEY WERE DEVELOPED. IN THE |
| | STRUCTURAL SHEETS, SHEET S13.0.1 UNDER THE HEADING |
| | STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS / MISCELLANEOUS NOTE # 4 |
| | INDICATES THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE: 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014) FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | THE 6TH EDITION (2017) FLORIDA WAS ADOPTED STATEWIDE ON |
| | DEC. 31/ 2017. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANS TO THE |
| | APPLICABLE CODE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | STRUCTURAL SHEET S13.01 WAS NOT UPDATED. STILL |
| | REFERENCING THE OLD CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS WITH THE THE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL COVER |
| | SHEET. NOTE: ARCHITECTURAL COVER SHEET 13.CVR WAS |
| | UPDATED WITH THE CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT BUT THE |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA INFORMATION IS INCORRECT. THE |
| | ACTUAL BUILDING AREA IS 2,123.5 S.F. NOT 2,000 S.F. |
| | AND, THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA FOR TYPE II |
| | CONSTRUCTION IS 23,000 S.F. NOT 23.00 S.F. PROVIDE |
| | CORRECT INFORMATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2A- THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN A13.4.0 INDICATES THE FINISH |
| | ROOFING SYSTEM IS TO BE TPO ROOFING SYSTEM. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORT FOR THIS PRODUCT. / |
| | 2017 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, |
| | 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT |
| | OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G20-3.005, |
| | RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS |
| | OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS: |
| | (31) (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES, |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NO SUBMITTAL AT THIS TIME. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER |
| | BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2B) FOR ALL ROOFING PRODUCTS PLEASE IDENTIFY ALL |
| | ROOFING SUB-SYSTEMS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED PRESSURES FOR |
| | ROOF ZONE # 1. REVIEW THE PRODUCT APPROVAL LIMITATIONS, |
| | IF ENHANCED FASTENING IS ALLOWED FOR ROOF ZONES 2 & 3. |
| | FASTENER DENSITIES SHALL BE INCREASED FOR BOTH |
| | INSULATION & THE BASE SHEET AS CALCULATED IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARDS RAS 117. CALCULATION |
| | PREPARED, SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR |
| | REGISTERED ARCHITECT. 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NO SUBMITTAL AT THIS TIME. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER |
| | BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2C) W. P. B. 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 |
| | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NO SUBMITTAL AT THIS TIME. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER |
| | BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- SHEET S13.0.2. SHOWS A MONO-SLOPED ROOF WITH NO |
| | PARAPETS. PRESSURES ARE THE SAME FOR ZONE 2 AND 3 |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WHY THE NEGATIVE ROOF PRESSURES HAVE NOT |
| | BEEN INCREASED. THE MONO- SLOPED ROOF DETAIL EVEN SHOWS |
| | (4) ROOF ZONE 3?S. ASCE 7-10 FIGURE 30.4-5A. PLEASE |
| | UPDATE PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NEGATIVE PRESSURES WERE REVISED, BUT CLARIFY WHY ALL |
| | THE POSITIVE PRESSURES WERE REDUCED? |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6) BUILDING PROVISO: PRECAST PLANK JOIST SYSTEMS ARE TO |
| | BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AND TO BE REVIEWED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD, WHEN APPROVED THE ARCHITECTS SHOP |
| | DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL APPLIED AND FORWARDED TO THE |
| | BUILDING DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED BY ARCHITECT. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON A |
| | TIMELY FASHION PRIOR TO INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
