| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-06 10:36:06 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) REVISION FOURTH MECHANICAL REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | RECEIVED E-MAIL FROM JOE DARSCH FROM ASTRO AIR INC. THE |
| | SAME INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED ON THE THIRD REVIEW WAS |
| | E-MAILED THIS TIME. NEED TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS FROM |
| | THIRD REVIEW. SEE COPY OF COMMENTS BELOW AND RESUBMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | RESIDENTIAL (R3) REVISION THIRD MECHANICAL REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- BASED ON THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED |
| | IT LOOKS LIKE THE A/C EQUIPMENT MAY BE OVER-SIZED. THE |
| | TOTAL COOLING CALCULATIONS CALL FOR 31453 BTUH. |
| | THEREFORE, A 3 TON UNIT MAY BE THE CORRECT SIZE OF UNIT |
| | REQUIRED. THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT IS A 4 TON UNIT. THE |
| | EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE MORE THAN 1.15 TIMES GREATER THAN |
| | THE TOTAL LOAD CALCULATED. SEC. R403.6.1.1 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). EQUIPMENT NEEDS TO BE |
| | REVISED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING DIFFERENT EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS. PREVIOUS CALCULATIONS LOOKED TO BE OK. |
| | THE ONLY THING WAS THAT SELECTED EQUIPMENT WAS |
| | OVERSIZED. CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED NOW HAVE A TOTAL |
| | COOLING LOAD OF 25459 BTUH. THEREFORE, THE 36000 BTUH |
| | IS OVERSIZED BASED ON THIS CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. PROVIDE COORDINATED INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 2- PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE A/C PLAN TO PROVIDE NAME |
| | AND SIGNATURE ON THE PLAN AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
