| Date |
Text |
| 2018-05-25 15:40:41 | CHANGE OF OF OCCUPANCY TO INSTITUTIONAL I-1 (CONDITION |
| | 1) , THIRD BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | 1- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | THE PLANS FAIL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2017 |
| | ACCESSIBILITY CODE 209.3 MEDICAL CARE AND LONG-TERM |
| | CARE FACILITIES. AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE |
| | COMPLYING WITH 503 SHALL BE PROVIDED AT AN ACCESSIBLE |
| | ENTRANCE TO LICENSED MEDICAL CARE AND LICENSED |
| | LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES WHERE THE PERIOD OF STAY |
| | EXCEEDS TWENTY-FOUR HOURS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. PASSENGER LOADING |
| | ZONE LOCATION WAS REVISED ON THE PLOT PLAN BUT NEEDS TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE LENGTH (SEC. 503.3.2), MARKING (SEC. |
| | 503.3.3) AND FLOOR AND GROUND SURFACES. HANDICAP RAMP |
| | DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET P-1 DOESN'T APPLY TO THE FLOOR |
| | AND GROUND SURFACE SEC. 503.4. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | UNISEX RESTROOM AND ADJACENT BATHROOM DON'T COMPLY WITH |
| | THE OVERLAP REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 604.3.2 |
| | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | AND WITH RESTROOM FIXTURE CLEARANCE DETAIL SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET A-5. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | (NOTE: SHOWER IS NOT DRAWN TO SCALE IN THIS ROOM. ALSO, |
| | SOME ROOMS AND CORRIDORS ARE NOT DRAWN TO THE SPECIFIED |
| | DIMENSIONS. PLEASE VERIFY THAT ALL SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS |
| | WILL BE PROVIDED IN FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THE LAVATORY REVISED POSITION DOESN'T |
| | ALLOW A FORWARD APPROACH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 606.2 |
| | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. ALSO, UNISEX RESTROOM AND ADJACENT |
| | BATHROOM DON'T COMPLY WITH THE OVERLAP REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | SEC. 604.3.2 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY AND WITH RESTROOM |
| | FIXTURE CLEARANCE DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET A-5. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. THE DOTTED LINE SHOWING THE WATER CLOSET AND |
| | LAVATORY CLEARANCE ARE NOT DRAWN TO SCALE. BESIDES, |
| | SHEET A-2 DOESN'T PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THESE |
| | ROOMS. THEREFORE, I AM UNABLE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE. |
| | SCALING DRAWINGS IS NOT ALLOWED. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS |
| | TAKE PRECEDENCE. REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: THERE ARE MANY AREAS IN THESE DRAWINGS THAT ARE |
| | NOT DRAWN TO SCALE AND DON'T REFLECT THE GIVEN |
| | DIMENSION. FOR EXAMPLE NOT ALL CORRIDORS MEASURE 60" AS |
| | SPECIFIED ON SHEET A-4. THESE WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT. |
| | SPECIFY THE SIZE OF EXISTING DOOR #3. TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITHOUT EH MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OPENING. |
| | ALSO, CLARIFY WHY DOOR HARDWARE FOR THESE TWO BATHROOMS |
| | IS DIFFERENT THAN THE OTHER BATHROOMS. CLEARLY SPECIFY |
| | THE DOOR HARDWARE FOR ALL DOORS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. 309 FBC-ACCESSIBLE. |
| | |
| | 3- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ARE TOO LOW BASED ON THE |
| | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT SPECIFIED (30'). REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | AND, CLEARLY INDICATE THAT DESIGN PRESSURES ARE NOMINAL |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES (VASD). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. REVISED DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET A-4 ARE INCORRECT AND ARE NOT |
| | CLEAR. CLARIFY WHY SPECIFYING TWO DIFFERENT MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHTS. THE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT |
| | OF 20' ' IS 1.29 NOT 1.21. AND THE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR |
| | FOR A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 24' IS 1.35 NOT 1.21. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEE TABLE 1609.7(2) FBC. |
| | |
| | 4- WELDED OR BOLTED CONNECTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS |
| | REQUIRED TO PROVIDE WELD PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS & |
| | WELDER OPERATOR PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION RECORDS IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE REFERENCED STANDARDS AT TIME OF |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | 2017 FBC-B 2204.1 WELDING |
| | 2017 FBC-B 2204.2 BOLTING. |
| | |
| | 5- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2017 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, |
| | 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT |
| | OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G20-3.005, |
| | RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS |
| | OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS: |
| | (A) EXTERIOR DOORS ,MULLIONS & ROOF HATCHES. |
| | (B) WINDOWS & MULLIONS |
| | (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL |
| | LOUVERS, EFIS SYSTEMS, |
| | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES, ROOF TOP |
| | VENTILATORS AND EXHAUST FANS |
| | (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A) ENTRANCE DOOR NOA 17-1114.01 SUBMITTED. CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY DOOR AND GLASS TYPE AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | INSTRUCTIONS ON DRAWING W17-54 SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVAL MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS |
| | "DEFERRED SUBMITTAL" AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED, BUT |
| | BEFORE ANY INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT DELAYS. |
| | |
| | 6- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | W. P. B. 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS |
| | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | IDENTIFY GLAZING/ MULLIONS. PLEASE IDENTIFY ON THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL BEFORE SUBMITTING TO DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD AND BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE BUILDING |
| | DEPARTMENT. FOR ALL PRODUCTS WITH GLAZING, PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY THE OPENING WIDTH & HEIGHT, TYPE OF GLAZING, |
| | MULLION SIZE, LENGTH IF UNREINFORCED OR REINFORCED |
| | INFORMATION IF REQUIRED, ATTACHMENTS AND ASSOCIATE |
| | PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING SIZE. 2014 FBC-B 1405.13.1 |
| | INSTALLATION. WINDOWS AND DOORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED MANUFACTURER?S INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | FASTENER SIZE AND SPACING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN SUCH |
| | INSTRUCTIONS AND SHALL BE CALCULATED BASED ON MAXIMUM |
| | LOADS AND SPACING USED IN THE TESTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8- BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT |
| | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. ONE SET OF |
| | PLANS WILL HAVE TO BE TAKEN (BY THE CONTRACTOR OR |
| | REPRESENTATIVE) TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE |
| | OFFICE LOCATED AT 2300 N. JOG RD. ROOMS 2W01-2W14 WEST |
| | PALM BEACH, FL. THE ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE |
| | STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL |
| | (561)233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 9- PLEASE NOTE A THOROUGH REVIEW COULD NOT BE COMPLETED |
| | IN THIS REVIEW AND DEPENDING ON THE RESPONSE COMMENTS |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY OCCUR ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEWS. |
| | 107. 2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10- WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| | AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 11- SLEEPING ROOMS NEED TO HAVE SEPARATION WALLS WITH |
| | FIRE PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 420..2 FBC. |
| | IDENTIFY WALL IN PLANS AND PROVIDE FIRE RATED WALL |
| | DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | NOTE: I APOLOGIZE. IT WAS OVERLOOKED ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW. I TAUGHT THEY WERE SPECIFIED AS FIRE RATED |
| | WALLS. |
| | |
| | 12- PARKING CALCULATIONS INFORMATION ON SHEET P-1 NEEDS |
| | TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PARKING |
| | SPACES SHOWN ON-THE REVISED PLOT PLAN. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 13-CLARIFICATION: MINIMUM REQUIRED CORRIDOR WIDTH IS |
| | 44" NOT 42". TABLE 1020.2 FBC. REVISE INFORMATION ON |
| | SHEET A-4 AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 14- THE FENCED YARD NEEDS TO BE ACCESSIBLE. SEC. |
| | 206.2.2 FBC ACCESSIBLE. |
| | |
| | 15- SINCE SOME AREAS OF THE FLOOR PLAN SUBMITTED ARE |
| | NOT DRAWN TO A TRUE SCALE, THEN IS HARD TO VERIFY DOOR |
| | MANEUVERING CLEARANCES BASED ON THE PUSH SIDE, PULL |
| | SIDE APPROACH AND THE SPECIFIED DOOR HARDWARE. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE SOME AREAS MAY NOT COMPLY. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS ON |
| | PLANS. CHECK THE KITCHEN AREA. CHECK IN-TAKE AND |
| | NURSE/MED OFFICE AND CORRIDOR ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE. |
| | SEE FIGURE 404.2.4.1 FBC ACCESSIBLE AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OF ALREADY |
| | REVIEWED DRAWINGS. DO NOT STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
