| Date |
Text |
| 2018-02-14 16:05:33 | ****PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS**** |
| | |
| | ART LANGE BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402 |
| | |
| | 561-805-6718 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION W/2010 WEST |
| | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, |
| | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION / FRC FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE |
| | 2017 6TH EDITION |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW: |
| | |
| | CODE CRITERIA |
| | |
| | 1. OK |
| | |
| | |
| | 2. IMPACT FEES OK |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3. PRODUCT APPROVALS PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | (A) OK A PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR A LAWSON |
| | 3200 CASEMENT WINDOW. THIS WAS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | (B) MISSING PAGE 3 THE MASONITE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED HAS A MAXIMUM FRAME HEIGHT OF 81.875 INCHES. |
| | THE PLANS SHOW AN 84 INCH DOOR. UPDATE AS NEEDED. |
| | |
| | (C) NOT PROVIDED PROVIDE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | ALONG WITH THE SELECTED ROOF ASSEMBLY USED. |
| | |
| | FBC 106.3 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. OK SIMPSON ATTACHMENT SHOWN AS LH 26 IS NOT FOUND. |
| | DID YOU MEAN LU 26. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | IF YOU WISH TO HAVE THE PERMIT ISSUED WITHOUT THE ABOVE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS, ALTERNATIVELY YOU CAN SUBMIT THESE |
| | LATER AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL BY LISTING THEM ON THE |
| | PLANS AS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | FBC 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF |
| | THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE DEFINED AS THOSE |
| | PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE |
| | TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. |
| | DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR |
| | APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST |
| | THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN |
| | RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD |
| | THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION |
| | INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO |
| | THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL |
| | ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE COMPLETE A RESUBMITTAL FORM: |
| | |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WPCONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/2 |
| | 013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF |
| | |
| | THIS FORM IS ALSO AVAILABLE AT THE BUILDING DIVISION. |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, SWAP OUT SHEETS WHICH HAVE CHANGED |
| | SO THAT THERE ARE TWO COMPLETE, COLLATED SETS OF PLANS |
| | READY FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. OLD SHEETS ARE TO BE |
| | RETAINED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE (SEPARATE |
| | FROM THE PERMIT SETS) AND MARKED *OLD SHEETS* OR |
| | *VOID*. PLEASE KEEP BOTH SETS OF OLD VOIDED SHEETS IN |
| | THE PERMIT PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH ITEM WAS |
| | ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
