| Date |
Text |
| 2018-02-01 06:28:20 | AT THIS POINT, I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS APPLICATION IS |
| | FOR. |
| | 1) THE PERMIT APPLICATION STATES THE DESCRIPTION OF |
| | WORK IS FOR A GREASE TRAP BUT ONE SET OF PLANS SHOWS AN |
| | OIL/GREASE INTERCEPTOR AND ANOTHER SET OF PLANS SHOWS |
| | AN OIL SEPARATOR. WHICH IS IT? CHANGE THE DESCRIPTION |
| | OF WORK ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | 2) REMOVE ALL OLD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FFROM THE |
| | PERMIT PACKAGE AND SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS |
| | THAT CLEARLY REFLECT THE SCOPE OF WORK TO BE DDONE. WPB |
| | AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.2014 . |
| | 3) YOU HAVE SUBMITTED COPIES OF DETAILS OF A TANK FROM |
| | FLORIDA SEPTIC INC. THE DETAILS STATE THAT THE TANK |
| | COMPLIES WITH SEC. 1003.5.1 OF THE 2014 FLORIDA |
| | PLUMBING CODE. THERE IS NO SUCH CODE SECTION IN THE |
| | PLUMBING CODE AND SEC. 1003.5 IS FOR GREASE |
| | INTERCEPTORS. CLARIFY. |
| | 4) OIL SEPARATOR DESIGN SHALL COMPLY WITH 2014 |
| | FBC-PLUMBING SEC.1003.4.2, 1003.4.2.1. THERE IS A NOTE |
| | ON THE SPECIFICATIONS FROM FLORIDA SEPTIC THAT THE |
| | TREATMENT RECEPTACLE HAS BEEN DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND |
| | STRUCTURUALLY TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER |
| | 64E-6.013, FL. ADMIN. CODE. THE F.A.C. DOES NOT APPLY |
| | TO OIL SEPARATORS. CLARIFY. |
| | 5) THE PLAN SHEET C.1 SHALL BEAR THE SEAL AND WET |
| | SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT OF RECCORD IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH FL. ADMIN. CODE RULE 61G1-16.003. |
| | |
| | NOTE: THE NEXT PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL SHALL BE SUBJECT |
| | TO A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF 4 TIME THE AMOUNT APPLIED TO |
| | THE PLAN REVIEW FEE PER FL. STATUTE 553.80 (2) (B). |
| | |
| | |
| | TIM LARGE |
| | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR |
| | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561-805-6692 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
