| Date |
Text |
| 2018-06-21 08:57:58 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE VALUE OF $9,200.00 STATED ON THE REVISION |
| | APPLICATION IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR THE ADDITIONAL SCOPE |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWING THAT WAS SUBMITTED. PROVIDE AN |
| | ITEMIZED COST BREAK DOWN FOR THE PROPOSED REVISED SCOPE |
| | OF WORK WITH AN ACCURATE TOTAL VALUE. FBC 109.3 |
| | BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, |
| | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL |
| | REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, |
| | PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, RELATIVE SITE |
| | WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COSTS, |
| | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. |
| | VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED |
| | DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| | (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 2) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 4) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5)THE PRODUCT APPROVAL (NOA NO. 17-1108.23) THAT IS |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS FOR THE EXTERIOR DOORS IS FOR A |
| | BI-FOLDING WINDOW. PLEASE REVISE PLANS AND SUBMIT THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE OUTSWING EXTERIOR DOORS. FBC |
| | 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| | PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5) THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA |
| | NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, |
| | STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES. IF THE |
| | WINDOWS ARE NOT LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RATED, THEN SUBMIT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STORM PANELS ALONG WITH A KEY |
| | PLAN AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 6) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 7) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 8) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 9) THE APPROVED PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF ANY IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. |
| | SEE THE IMPACT FEE REVIEW FOR DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 10) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 11) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
