| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-25 16:37:32 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE VALUE OF $9,200.00 STATED ON THE REVISION |
| | APPLICATION IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR THE ADDITIONAL SCOPE |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWING THAT WAS SUBMITTED. PROVIDE AN |
| | ITEMIZED COST BREAK DOWN FOR THE PROPOSED REVISED SCOPE |
| | OF WORK WITH AN ACCURATE TOTAL VALUE. FBC 109.3 |
| | BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, |
| | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL |
| | REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, |
| | PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, RELATIVE SITE |
| | WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COSTS, |
| | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. |
| | VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED |
| | DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| | (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF A FLOOR PLAN THAT ACCURATELY |
| | SHOWS AND DESCRIBES THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. FBC |
| | 107.2.1 (INDICATE ON THE PLANS THE 598 SQFT. OF STORAGE |
| | AREA THAT WILL BE CONVERTED TO LIVING AREA.) |
| | |
| | 3) THE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED DO NOT MATCH THE PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORDS. SHOW THE |
| | ENTIRE STRUCTURE THAT IS UNDER ROOF ON THE PLANS |
| | INCLUDING CARPORTS, PORCHES, ETC. IF THE EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURE DOES NOT MATCH THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S |
| | DIAGRAM, EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCES. FBC 107.2.1 ( THE |
| | ROOM CONTAINING THE WATER HEATER AND WASHER IS NOT |
| | SHOWN ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S DRAWINGS AND THE CITY |
| | HAS NO RECORD OF IT. UNLESS YOU CAN PROVIDE PROOF THAT |
| | IT WAS CONSTRUCTED WITH THE PROPER PERMITS AND |
| | INSPECTIONS, IT WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED OR BROUGHT INTO |
| | COMPLIANCE.) |
| | |
| | 4) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5) THAT HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH |
| | FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS |
| | AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE |
| | WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR |
| | DOOR TYPES. IF THE WINDOWS ARE NOT LARGE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | RATED, THEN SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STORM |
| | PANELS ALONG WITH A KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 6) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 7) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 8) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 9) THE APPROVED PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF ANY IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. |
| | SEE THE IMPACT FEE REVIEW FOR DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 10) (NEW COMMENT) THE PERMIT THAT IS BEING REVISED WAS |
| | ISSUED UNDER THE 2014 FBC, FIFTH EDITION AND THE 2011 |
| | NEC. REVISE THE DESIGN CRITERIA ON THE PLANS |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 11) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
