| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-06 09:28:36 | |
| | NOTE: |
| | PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO ARCHITECT'S E-MAIL |
| | GOOD MORNING MR.ACREE, |
| | IT LOOKS LIKE THE 32"X56" CASEMENT WINDOW COMPLIES WITH |
| | THE EGRESS. THIS IS THE MAIN CONCERN. THE REST OF THE |
| | COMMENTS I DIDN'T SEE THE REVISED PLANS, BUT I BELIEVED |
| | THEY MIGHT BE TAKEN CARE OF. THE ONLY THING IS |
| | REGARDING THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE. IF YOU ARE DESIGNING |
| | THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE YOU NEED TO PROVIDE ALL THE |
| | STRUCTURAL DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR WRITE IN THE |
| | DRAWINGS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. TYPICALLY, SCREEN |
| | ENCLOSURES ARE DESIGNED BY THE SCREEN COMPANIES |
| | ENGINEERS. I AM NOT AWARE OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | SCREEN ENCLOSURE DOORS. ALL OF THE COMPONENT OF THE |
| | SCREEN ENCLOSURES ARE DESIGNED BY THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | IN TERMS OF REQUIRED DRAWINGS, WE ONLY REQUIRE 2 |
| | COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS. IF PLUMBING, MECHANICAL OR |
| | ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS ARE APPROVED AND THEY ARE NOT |
| | REVISED, THEN THERE IS NOT NEED TO SUBMIT NEW DRAWINGS. |
| | IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PUT |
| | TOGETHER TWO COMPLETE SETS. INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING |
| | AND REMOVE OLD DRAWING. IF TWO NEW COMPLETE SETS ARE |
| | PROVIDED, THEN THEY WILL BE ROUTED TO EACH TRADE EVEN |
| | IF THEY ARE ALREADY APPROVED SO THE PLANS GET |
| | RE-STAMPED. |
| | THANK YOU |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 1- BEDROOM #3 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE EMERGENCY ESCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). ALL THE WINDOWS ARE FIXED WINDOWS. |
| | REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. NEED TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY |
| | ESCAPE. NOTE: MAKE SURE EMERGENCY ESCAPE MEETS ALL THE |
| | MINIMUM CLEAR OPENINGS REQUIREMENTS. CLEAR WIDTH (20"), |
| | CLEAR HEIGHT (24") AND TOTAL CLEAR OPENING (5.7S.F.). |
| | RESPONSE: 24"X44" CASEMENT WINDOW SPECIFIED IN THE |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH ALL THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR A SECOND FLOOR EGRESS WINDOW. |
| | CONTACTED COMPANY SHOWN ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED FOR FIXED WINDOWS AND SLIDING WINDOWS AND |
| | THEY CONFIRMED THAT THIS SIZE OF CASEMENT WINDOW |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE. |
| | INCLUDING DOUBLE DOORS. SEE PLANS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: CONSTRUCTION IS NOT CLEAR. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS AND ATTACHMENT TO THE SUBSTRATE AND MESH |
| | SPECIFICATIONS.L PROVIDE NOA AS STATED BY THE ARCHITECT |
| | ON RESPONSE LETTER. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | MASTER BATHROOM SKYLIGHT FRAMING. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAIL WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 4- HOUSE IS DESIGNED WITH UNVENTED ATTIC. ARCHITECT IS |
| | SPECIFYING R-30 ICYNENE SPRAY INSULATION. PROVIDE ICC |
| | EVALUATION REPORT (2 COPIES) FOR THE ICYNENE R-30 |
| | INSULATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ICC EVALUATION REPORT WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET A-10: |
| | A) THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE DESIGN PARAMETERS SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET A-10 DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | S-4. ALSO, CLARIFY WHAT'S BUILDING CATEGORY "B". REVISE |
| | THE WIND SPEED. REVISE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT AND REVISE |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | B) THE PLYWOOD SHEATHING NAILING PATTERNS DON'T MATCH |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON SHEET S-4. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | C) THE TYPICAL WOOD BUCK TO CONCRETE CONNECTION DETAIL |
| | DOESN'T MATCH STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | S-4. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: INFORMATION STILL DOESN'T MATCH. COORDINATE |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON SHEET S-4 TO AVOID CONFLICTS. |
| | INFORMATION TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET S-4: |
| | A) SPECIFY ALL THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| | R301.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: RESPONSE LETTER REFERS TO WOOD TRUSS SYSTEM |
| | NOTE #9. NOTE #9 IS NOT CLEAR AND THE DESIGN LOAD TABLE |
| | ON SAME SHEET DOESN'T REFLECT THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON |
| | NOTE #9. PROVIDE CLEAR DESIGN LOAD TABLE IDENTIFYING |
| | ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS AT TOP AND BOTTOM CHORDS OF |
| | TRUSSES. |
| | |
| | 6- REVISE TYPICAL STEP FOOTING DETAIL ON SHEET S-5. THE |
| | RISER HEIGHT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R311.7.5.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: DETAIL WAS NOT REVISED. STILL SHOWING |
| | DIMENSIONS THAT DON'T COMPLY, AND THERE IS NOT NOTE |
| | INDICATING TO SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AS STATED ON THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20.3.001 FOR: |
| | A) METAL ROOF PANELS THAT MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ON SHEET S-4 FOR |
| | ALL ROOF ZONES. THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FL21383.1 SUBMITTED DON'T MEET THOSE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | B) ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: THERE ARE TOO |
| | MANY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. CLEARLY MARK |
| | WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR THE ENTRY DOOR AND SUBMIT |
| | ONLY TWO COPIES. |
| | |
| | C) ROUND WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | D) CASEMENT WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | E) GARAGE EXTERIOR SWING DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: |
| | THERE ARE TOO MANY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| | CLEARLY MARK WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR THE SWING |
| | GARAGE DOOR AND SUBMIT ONLY TWO COPIES. |
| | |
| | F) UTILITY EXTERIOR SWING DOOR WITH DOGGIE DOOR AS |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: THERE ARE TOO MANY DOOR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTED. CLEARLY MARK WHICH PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS FOR THE UTILITY ROOM AND HAVE THE DOGGIE |
| | DOOR (SUBMIT ONLY TWO COPIES). |
| | |
| | G) SKYLIGHT AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | H) FOLDING DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS BY THE FLORIDA ROOM. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | I) EXTERIOR FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: THERE |
| | ARE TOO MANY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. CLEARLY |
| | MARK WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS FOR THE MASTER BEDROOM, |
| | FLORIDA ROOM AND BEDROOM #4 (SUBMIT ONLY TWO COPIES). |
| | |
| | J) LOW SLOPED ROOF. NOTE: CLEARLY IDENTIFY APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED. IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T |
| | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | K) BALCONY UNDERLAYMENT THAT IS DESIGNED TO BE |
| | INSTALLED WITH FINISH FLOOR SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FINISH |
| | FLOORING. NOTE: CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY TO |
| | BE INSTALLED AND RAS 117 CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED |
| | IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR ALL ZONES. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | L) CEMENTITIOUS BOARD SOFFIT AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-5. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | NOTE: CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY SINGLE HUNG |
| | WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
