| Date |
Text |
| 2018-03-12 17:14:09 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- REVISE THE GRAVITY LOADS SPECIFIED ON SHEET T-1. |
| | NEED TO REVISE THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD TO COMPLY WITH TABLE |
| | R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: ACCORDING TO PLANS SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE |
| | THE ATTIC ABOVE GARAGE IS GOING TO BE USED FOR STORAGE. |
| | SEE SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS AND OPTIONAL DROP STAIRS. |
| | REVISE LOADS ACCORDINGLY. SEE TABLE R301.5 FOR REQUIRED |
| | LIVE LOADS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: REVISE LOADING |
| | CRITERIA SHOWN ON TRUSS LAYOUT SUBMITTED TO MATCH |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD PROPOSED DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 2- REVISE STRUCTURAL NOTE #3 ON SHEET T-1. ACCORDING TO |
| | ASTM C 1063 THE HIGH RIB METAL LATH NEED TO BE NAILED |
| | WITH NAILS OR STAPLES THAT PROVIDE MIN. 1-3/4" |
| | PENETRATION INTO THE ROOF TRUSS (HORIZONTAL FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS). |
| | RESPONSE: NOTE #3 CALLS FOR OPTIONAL STAPLES WITH 7/8" |
| | LEGS. THIS STAPLES DON'T COMPLY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | A) FORM R405-2017 SUBMITTED NOW IS INCORRECT. THIS FORM |
| | IS FOR THE 2017 CODE. THIS BUILDING IS BEING REVIEWED |
| | UNDER THE 2014 CODE. PROVIDE CORRECT FORM. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B) BUILDER NAME IS INCORRECT. IT DOESN'T MATCH BUILDER |
| | SHOWN ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| | DESIGN AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL REQUIRED FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHOWING THE |
| | U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED IN THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS IS REQUIRED WHEN THE CALCULATIONS DON'T |
| | USE THE PROGRAM'S DEFAULT FACTOR. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | A) ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NEED |
| | DOOR THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE CALCULATED DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES. DRAWING MA-FL0222-17 SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET |
| | THEM. NOTE: ALSO, PROVIDE COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT |
| | CORRESPONDS TO DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. OR PROVIDE MIAMI |
| | DADE NOA. OR MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMIT COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING PACKAGE FOR SITE SPECIFIC INSTALLATION. |
| | SUBMIT TWO COPIES. ALSO, DRAWINGS ARE NOT LEGIBLE |
| | BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO SMALL. PRINT DRAWINGS IN LANDSCAPE |
| | FORMAT SO THEY USE THE WHOLE PAPER AND ARE MORE |
| | LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | B) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SUBMIT TWO |
| | COPIES OF NOA 15-0602.06. ONLY ONE WAS SUBMITTED. ALSO, |
| | DRAWINGS ARE NOT LEGIBLE BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO SMALL. |
| | PRINT DRAWINGS IN LANDSCAPE FORMAT SO THEY USE THE |
| | WHOLE PAPER AND ARE MORE LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | C) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOTE: PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO DRAWINGS |
| | SUBMITTED. OR PROVIDE MIAMI DADE NOA. OR MANUFACTURER |
| | MAY SUBMIT COMPLETE ENGINEERING PACKAGE FOR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC INSTALLATION. SUBMIT TWO COPIES. ALSO, |
| | DRAWINGS ARE NOT LEGIBLE BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO SMALL. |
| | PRINT DRAWINGS IN LANDSCAPE FORMAT SO THEY USE THE |
| | WHOLE PAPER AND ARE MORE LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | D) ROOF SHINGLES AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SUBMIT TWO COPIES |
| | OF NOA 12-1127.03. ONLY ONE WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | E) PRECAST LINTELS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | R401.3 DRAINAGE: SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIVERTED TO |
| | A STORM SEWER CONVEYANCE OR OTHER APPROVED POINT OF |
| | COLLECTION THAT DOES NOT CREATE A HAZARD. LOTS SHALL BE |
| | GRADED TO DRAIN SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM FOUNDATION |
| | WALLS. THE GRADE SHALL FALL A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES (152 |
| | MM) WITHIN THE FIRST 10 FEET (3048 MM). |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTEER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
