| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-06 13:54:12 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) ALS 1.1 - THERE ARE THREE (3) OCCUPANCIES INDICATED; |
| | BUSINESS, ASSEMBLY & STORAGE. IS THIS A MIXED OR |
| | SEPARATED OCCUPANCY PER NFPA 101? |
| | |
| | CHAPTER 6, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION STATES: |
| | |
| | 6.1.14 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCIES. |
| | 6.1.14.1 GENERAL. |
| | 6.1.14.1.1 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF 6.1.14.1 AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) MIXED OCCUPANCIES ? 6.1.14.3 |
| | (2) SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES ? 6.1.14.4 |
| | 6.1.14.1.2 WHERE EXIT ACCESS FROM AN OCCUPANCY |
| | TRAVERSES ANOTHER OCCUPANCY, THE MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY |
| | SHALL BE TREATED AS A MIXED OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | 6.1.14.3 MIXED OCCUPANCIES. |
| | 6.1.14.3.1 EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | CLASSIFIED AS TO ITS USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.1 |
| | 6.1.14.3.2* THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPANCIES INVOLVED, |
| | UNLESS SEPARATE SAFEGUARDS ARE APPROVED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) ALS 1.1 - TWO(2) EXITS ARE INDICATED; HOWEVER, ONE |
| | EXIT TRAVERSES A STORAGE CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7 MEANS OF EGRESS: |
| | |
| | 7.5.1.6 EXIT ACCESS FROM ROOMS OR SPACES SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE THROUGH ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS |
| | OR AREAS, PROVIDED THAT SUCH ROOMS OR AREAS ARE |
| | ACCESSORY TO THE AREA SERVED. FOYERS, LOBBIES, AND |
| | RECEPTION ROOMS CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR CORRIDORS |
| | SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INTERVENING ROOMS. EXIT |
| | ACCESS SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO |
| | PASS THROUGH ANY AREA IDENTIFIED UNDER PROTECTION FROM |
| | HAZARDS IN CHAPTERS 11 THROUGH 43. |
| | |
| | PER # 1 ABOVE, ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY IS THE MSOT |
| | RESTRICTIVE OF A MIXED OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | PER CHAPTER 12, NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES: |
| | |
| | 12.2.5.2 ACCESS THROUGH HAZARDOUS AREAS. MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS FROM A ROOM OR SPACE FOR ASSEMBLY PURPOSES SHALL |
| | NOT BE PERMITTED THROUGH KITCHENS, STOREROOMS, |
| | RESTROOMS, CLOSETS, PLATFORMS, STAGES, PROJECTION |
| | ROOMS, OR HAZARDOUS AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN 12.3.2. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE RELOCATE THE EXIT TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRMENTS |
| | OR JUSTIFY WITH SPECIFIC CODE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) ALS 1.1 & A 3.0.1 - DOOR # 117 IS INDICATED WITH A |
| | FOB ENTRY W/MANUAL KEY. PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12. |
| | |
| | 12.2.2.2.6 DOORS IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED ACCESS |
| | CONTROL SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.6.2, AND SUCH DOORS |
| | SHALL NOT BE LOCKED FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WHEN THE |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY IS OCCUPIED. (SEE 7.2.1.1.3.) |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE JSUTIFICATION MEETING THIS REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET ALS 1.1 - THERE IS A DOOR # 117 AND WINDOW "F" |
| | INDICATED IN THE WALL SEPRATING THE OFFICE AREA AND THE |
| | STORAGE AREA. THOUGH THIS WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A |
| | SEPARATION OF OCCUPANCY IT IS CONSIDERED A SEPARATION |
| | OF HAZARD. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 6: |
| | |
| | 6.2 HAZARD OF CONTENTS. |
| | 6.2.1 GENERAL. |
| | 6.2.1.1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CODE, THE HAZARD OF |
| | CONTENTS SHALL BE THE RELATIVE DANGER OF THE START AND |
| | SPREAD OF FIRE, THE DANGER OF SMOKE OR GASES GENERATED, |
| | AND THE DANGER OF EXPLOSION OR OTHER OCCURRENCE |
| | POTENTIALLY ENDANGERING THE LIVES AND SAFETY OF THE |
| | OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 6.2.1.3* FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CODE, WHERE DIFFERENT |
| | DEGREES OF HAZARD OF CONTENTS EXIST IN DIFFERENT PARTS |
| | OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, THE MOST HAZARDOUS SHALL |
| | GOVERN THE CLASSIFICATION, UNLESS HAZARDOUS AREAS ARE |
| | SEPARATED OR PROTECTED AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 8.7 AND |
| | THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CHAPTERS 11 THROUGH 43. |
| | |
| | 8.7 SPECIAL HAZARD PROTECTION. |
| | 8.7.1 GENERAL. |
| | 8.7.1.1* PROTECTION FROM ANY AREA HAVING A DEGREE OF |
| | HAZARD GREATER THAN THAT NORMAL TO THE GENERAL |
| | OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING MEANS: |
| | (1) ENCLOSING THE AREA WITH A FIRE BARRIER WITHOUT |
| | WINDOWS THAT HAS A 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8.3 |
| | (2) PROTECTING THE AREA WITH AUTOMATIC EXTINGUISHING |
| | SYSTEMS INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7 |
| | (3) APPLYING BOTH 8.7.1.1(1) AND (2) WHERE THE HAZARD |
| | IS SEVERE OR WHERE OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY CHAPTERS 11 |
| | THROUGH 43 |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE CLASSIFICATION HAZARD IN DETAIL AND |
| | PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIRED SEPARATION PER THE REQUIRMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET AD 1.1 - THERE ARE NOTE BOXES IN THE DRAWING |
| | INDICATED AS # 12 & # 13. THERE IS NO CORRESPONDING |
| | NOTE EXPLANATIONS FOR THESE NUMBERS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | THE STORAGE IS NOT ACCESSORY AND THE EXIT CAN NOT |
| | TRAVERSE IT. |