| Date |
Text |
| 2018-01-25 12:50:28 | 2ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #17120042 |
| | 1/25/18 |
| | |
| | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. |
| | |
| | 1) COMMENTS #2, 3, 4, & 5 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW STILL |
| | EXIST. THE REVISED ENERGY AND AC CALCULATIONS WERE NOT |
| | SUBMITTED-, AND THE SYSTEM RISER DIAGRAM WAS NOT |
| | CORRECTED. SEE BELOW: |
| | |
| | (2) THE ENERGYGAUGE COMPLIANCE REPORT IS LISTING DATA |
| | FOR ZONES AND AHU IDENTIFICATIONS THAT DO NOT MATCH |
| | WITH THE PLANS- THERE ARE NO ZONES SHOWN ON THE PLANS, |
| | AND THE AHU'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE LABELED 1-1, 1-2, |
| | 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, AND 4-1. |
| | |
| | (3) THE AC CALCULATIONS ARE INDICATING THAT THE SYSTEMS |
| | SELECTED (AS SHOWN ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ) ARE |
| | OVERSIZED- SEE SECTION C403.2.2 FBC-14 ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | (4) THE ENERGY REPORT IS MISSING COMPLIANCE DATA FOR |
| | THE CHILLER, THE 3-TON MINI SPLIT SYSTEM, AND THE |
| | PIPING SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | (5) M7.2: THE SYSTEM RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS TWO CHILLERS, |
| | TWO ERV'S, AND WFC SYSTEMS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLANS - PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 2) REGARDING THE MAKEUP AIR TRANSFER DUCTS FROM THE |
| | CORRIDORS TO THE REST ROOMS, PLEASE SEE SECTION 601.2 |
| | EXCEPTION 1 AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 3) M0.1 & M6.3: THE EXHAUST AIR CALCULATION TABLE SHOWS |
| | A TOTAL OF 300 CFMS OF EXHAUST AIR PROVIDED, HOWEVER |
| | THE EF SCHEDULE SHOWS A TOTAL OF 2500 CFMS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 4) COMMENT #7 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW STILL EXISTS. THE |
| | REVISED PLANS DO NOT CLARIFY IF ALL OF THE VAV'S |
| | SHARING THE COMMON RETURN AIR PLENUMS WILL SHUT DOWN IF |
| | A SMOKE DETECTOR ACTIVATES. PLEASE REVIEW THE EXCEPTION |
| | LISTED UNDER SECTION 606.2.2. |
| | |
| | 606.2.2 COMMON SUPPLY AND RETURN AIR SYSTEMS. |
| | WHERE MULTIPLE AIR-HANDLING SYSTEMS SHARE COMMON SUPPLY |
| | OR RETURN AIR DUCTS OR PLENUMS WITH A COMBINED DESIGN |
| | CAPACITY GREATER THAN 2,000 CFM (0.9 M3/S), THE RETURN |
| | AIR SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH SMOKE DETECTORS IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 606.2.1. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTION: INDIVIDUAL SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL NOT BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR EACH FAN-POWERED TERMINAL UNIT, PROVIDED |
| | THAT SUCH UNITS DO NOT HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL DESIGN |
| | CAPACITY GREATER THAN 2,000 CFM (0.9 M3/S) AND WILL BE |
| | SHUT DOWN BY ACTIVATION OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 1. SMOKE DETECTORS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 606.2.1 AND |
| | 606.2.3. |
| | |
| | 2. AN APPROVED AREA SMOKE DETECTOR SYSTEM LOCATED IN |
| | THE RETURN AIR PLENUM SERVING SUCH UNITS. |
| | |
| | 3. AN AREA SMOKE DETECTOR SYSTEM AS PRESCRIBED IN THE |
| | EXCEPTION TO SECTION 606.2.1. |
| | |
| | IN ALL CASES, THE SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | SECTIONS 606.4 AND 606.4.1. |
| | |
| | 5) THE SUBMITTALS FOR THE FIRE DAMPER AND FIRESTOPPING |
| | ARE VERY POOR COPIES THAT HAVE LARGE AMOUNTS OF PRINT |
| | AND DIAGRAMS MISSING- PLEASE PROVIDE GOOD COPIES. |
| | |
| | 6) REGARDING THE REQUEST FOR THE WIND LOAD ENGINEERING |
| | TO BA DEFERRED SUBMITTAL PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 1) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. |
| | FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS |
| | ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE |
| | NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE |
| | APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL |
| | OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST THE |
| | DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR |
| | REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN |
| | RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD |
| | THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION |
| | INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO |
| | THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL |
| | ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | 2) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE |
| | DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND |
| | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
