| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-11 17:29:07 | THE STANDARD PARKING STALL DETAILS ON SHEET C11 OF THE |
| | PLANS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S PARKING STALL |
| | STANDARDS' DIMENSIONS OR STRIPING REQUIREMENTS IN THE |
| | ZONING CODE OR WITH THE PARKING STALL DETAILS IN THE |
| | APPROVED SITE PLAN. |
| | THE BIKE RACK PLAN VIEW SHOWN ON SHEET C12 HAS MINIMUM |
| | DIMENSIONS OF 12" BETWEEN THE RACKS AND THE EDGE OF THE |
| | PAD. THESE DIMENSIONS DO NOT COMPLY WITH MINIMUM BIKE |
| | RACK PAD DIMENSIONS INCLUDED IN APPROVED SITE PLAN. |
| | THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES |
| | IDENTIFIED ON THE BUILDING PLANS ARE DIFFERENT FROM |
| | THOSE IN THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. THE WIDTHS OF THE |
| | PARALLEL SPACES ON THE BUILDING PLANS ARE OF 8.5 FEET |
| | AND 10 FEET COMPARED TO 8 FEET ON THE SITE PLAN. THE |
| | APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW THIS |
| | ADDITIONAL SPACE ON THE PARKING SPACES IMPACTS OTHER |
| | COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN. THIS EXPLANATION SHOULD INCLUDE |
| | AN EAST-WEST CROSS SECTION OF THE SITE IN THE AREA |
| | AROUND BUILDINGS 2 AND 5 THAT COMPARES DIMENSIONS |
| | BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUILDING PLAN AND THE APPROVED |
| | SITE PLAN. |
| | THE BIKE RACK DEPICTED ON THE SITE PLAN ON THE NE SIDE |
| | OF THE PUPPY PARK IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PAVING AND |
| | STRIPING PLAN. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES ON THE |
| | PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | PARKING SPACES ON THE SITE PLAN. STAFF NOTED SOME |
| | INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF SPACES ON |
| | SECTIONS OF BOTH PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE PAVING AND |
| | STRIPING PLAN DEPICTS FIVE (5) PARALLEL PARKING SPACES |
| | ON THE SE AREA OF THE SITE TO THE EAST OF BUILDING 3 |
| | WHILE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS SIX (6) PARALLEL SPACES ON |
| | THIS AREA. IN ADDITION, THE PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN |
| | SHOWS SIX (6) SPACES ON THE ROW LOCATED ON THE SW |
| | CORNER OF THE SITE WHILE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS FIVE (5) |
| | SPACES FOR THIS SAME PARKING ROW. SIMILAR TO THE |
| | COMMENT ABOVE, THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO EXPLAIN HOW THESE |
| | DISCREPANCIES IN THE PARKING AREAS IMPACT OTHER |
| | COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN. |
| | IN ADDITION, THE APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE BELLA VITA |
| | MINOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT ISSUED ON OCTOBER 26, 2017 |
| | INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL: |
| | "5. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT |
| | FOR THE PROJECT, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, SITE PLAN, AND |
| | ENGINEERING PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED |
| | TO RELOCATE THE CURBS TO THE POSITION OF THE WHEEL |
| | STOPS AND PROVIDE A LANDSCAPED OVERHANG WHERE POSSIBLE |
| | WITHIN THE PARKING AREAS TO PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA. THE DESIGN SHALL FOLLOW THE TYPICAL |
| | PARKING STALL LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. A |
| | MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO |
| | REFLECT ANY REVISIONS TO THE PLANS." |
| | SINCE NO REVISED SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND |
| | ENGINEERING PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS CONSISTENT WITH |
| | THE ABOVE CONDITION HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED, THE BUILDING |
| | PLANS INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE APPROVED. |
| | |
