| Date |
Text |
| 2017-11-08 12:15:10 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS NO EXISTING OR PROPOSED OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| | INCLUDING OCCUPANY CODE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THE IS NO NOTE INDICATING COMPLAINCE WITH ANY LIFE |
| | SAFETY CODE. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING |
| | THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER |
| | APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THERE IN NO INDICATION OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING INFORMATION. I.E. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION, FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM, INTEIOR FINISHES, ETC. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) THERE ARE NO DIMENSIONS INDICATED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL DIMENSIONS OF EACH |
| | AREA/ROOM/SPACE/CORRIDOR, ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) THE IS NO DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DOOR DETAILS, INCLUDING, TYPE, SIZE, |
| | LOCKS, LATCHES, HARDWARE, ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) A KITCHEN IS INDICATED. THERE IS NO INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR |
| | VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL |
| | COOKING OPERATIONS, 2011 EDITION, EITHER EXISITNG OR |
| | PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE OF COMPLIANT EXISITNG |
| | OR PROPOSED SHOP DRAWINGS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) A PIZZA OVEN IS INDICATED. THERE ARE NO |
| | SPECIFICATION SHEETS OF PROPTECTION PER NFPA 96. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURES DETAIL SHEETS INCLUDING |
| | INSTALLATION INSTURCTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 8) THERE IS ONLY ONE EXIT FROM THE MAIN AREA AND TWO |
| | ARE REQUIRED. THE EXIT FROM THE MAIN AREA CAN NOT PASS |
| | THRU THE KITCHEN AREA. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT OR PROVIDE FFPC REFERENCE FOR THE |
| | EXCEPTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 9) THE DOOR TO THE FRONT RESTROOM APPEARS TO OPEN UP |
| | INTO THE EXIT CORRIDOR/PATHWAY. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, |
| | OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT |
| | MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A |
| | CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN, |
| | UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS |
| | PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR LEAF IS FULLY |
| | OPEN. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT OR JUSTIFY PER THE CODE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 10) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 11) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
