| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-11 11:45:22 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- IT LOOKS LIKE THE REVISED WINDOW FOR BEDROOM #2 |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| | R310 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). ACCORDING TO |
| | THE PGT WINDOWS WEBSITE, THE SIZE OF WINDOWS SPECIFIED |
| | (SINGLE HUNG 36"X60") DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRED |
| | HEIGHT CLEAR OPENING AND TOTAL CLEAR OPENING FOR |
| | WINDOWS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | COMPLY OR PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE CLEAR OPENINGS. NOTE: KEEP IN |
| | MIND THAT EGRESS NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE NORMAL |
| | OPERATION OF THE WINDOW WITHOUT ANY ADDITIONAL STEP OR |
| | KNOWLEDGE TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED OPENING. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET S-2: DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON THE ROOF |
| | FRAMING NOTES FOR ROOF ZONES 2 AND 3 DON'T CORRESPOND |
| | TO EXPOSURE "D" BASED ON THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF THIS |
| | TWO STORY BUILDING. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.1 AND |
| | TABLE R301.2(2) FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) FLOOR INFORMATION ON ITEM #8 IS MISSING THE |
| | INSULATION R-VALUE BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND THE A/C AREA |
| | ABOVE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING THE BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| | SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DON'T USE THE |
| | DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 4- NEW COMMENT: REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING |
| | THE CEILING FAN CREDIT. PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY THE SIZE |
| | OF ALL CEILING FANS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE |
| | R405.7.6 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 5- A) SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED NEEDS THE ENGINEER'S |
| | ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. IT LOOKS LIKE THE ENGINEER'S |
| | SIGNATURE IS NOT ORIGINAL. IT LOOKS LIKE IS THE EXACT |
| | SAME COPY OF THE SIGNATURE ON ALL REPORTS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | B) SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED IS MISSING A PLOT PLAN |
| | SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE SOIL INVESTIGATION AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1803.6 FBC-BUILDING, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. NOTE: THIS LOT |
| | WAS SUBDIVIDED ONTO 3 LOTS. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY WHERE ARE THE ETO DOORS DRAWING |
| | #ET0002 SUBMITTED GOING TO BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO |
| | DRAWINGS SUBMITTED AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. |
| | IF THERE IS NOT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL DOOR |
| | MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMIT COMPLETE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING |
| | PACKAGE FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL. MORE |
| | INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED IF DRAWINGS WILL BE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL. PLEASE ADVICE |
| | IF SUBMITTING DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL REVIEW. |
| | MORE INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE |
| | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | B) BALCONIES WATERPROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. PROVIDE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL OR MIAMI DADE NOA FOR THE |
| | MASTERSEAL 550 WATERPROOFING SUBMITTED THIS TIME. NEED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CONCRETE DECK THAT IS DESIGNED TO |
| | RECEIVE FINISH FLOOR AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD. CLEARLY MARK SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED |
| | AND PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF |
| | THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR ALL DECK ZONES. IF THERE IS NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMIT COMPLETE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING |
| | PACKAGE FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL. NOTE: THERE ARE |
| | SEVERAL PRODUCTS THAT ALREADY HAVE A PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE LOOK AT SEALOFLEX PRODUCTS. |
| | |
| | C) ALUMINUM MULLIONS NOA 16-0218.03 SUBMITTED: CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY SIZE OF MULLIONS TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | D) OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR DOOR |
| | THAT MEETS THE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE |
| | ARCHITECT ON SHEET A-301. |
| | RESPONSE: DESIGN PRESSURES OF NOA 15-0826.34 SUBMITTED |
| | ARE LOWER THAN THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | E) BAHAMA SHUTTERS NOA 15-0316.11 SUBMITTED. |
| | RESPONSE: PROVIDE PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE. |
| | |
| | F) COLONIAL SHUTTERS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. AND, |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE CITY |
| | SAMPLE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | G) PRECAST LINTELS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 7- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. NOTE: PLEASE PLACE THE REVIEW STAMP ON THE |
| | FRONT OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOT ON THE BACK. THIS IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR PROPER RECORD RETENTION PURPOSES. WHEN THE |
| | STAMPS ARE PLACED ON THE BACK OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | THEY DON'T GET SCANNED. SEC. 107.2.1.4 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | THE COLONIAL SHUTTERS INSTALLATION SPECS SUBMITTED |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9- THERE ARE TOO MANY PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| | CLEARLY MARK ON EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL LOCATION WHERE |
| | THE DOOR OR WINDOW IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. REMOVE ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT ARE NOT GOING TO BE USED TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 10- ONE SET OF PLANS SUBMITTED IS MISSING DRAWING M201 |
| | AND S-4. PROVIDE 2 COMPLETE SETS. SEC. 107.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11- SURVEY SUBMITTED: REVISE THE FLOOD INFORMATION. THE |
| | NEW FLOOD MAPS WENT INTO EFFECT ON OCTOBER 5TH 2017. |
| | PROVIDE ALL THE FLOOD INFORMATION BASED ON THE CURRENT |
| | FLOOD MAPS TO AVOID CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. (NOTE: SURVEY SPECIFIED IS INCORRECT ALSO. |
| | ACCORDING TO MAP DATED MARCH 1, 1979 THIS PROPERTY WAS |
| | LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE "C" NOT "B"). |
| | |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
