| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-22 11:24:51 | 1ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #17090272 |
| | 12/22/17 |
| | |
| | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. |
| | |
| | 1) THE LS-1 PLAN IS MISSING FROM ONE OF THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLAN SETS. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEETS LS-1, M-1, & M-2: THE VENTILATION |
| | CALCULATIONS BASED ON WAREHOUSE AND SALE AREA DO NOT |
| | CLEARLY REPRESENT THE ACTUAL USES OF THE TENANT SPACE. |
| | THE LS-1 IS INDICATING F-1 WHICH IS A FACTORY |
| | OCCUPANCY, AND THE PLANS ARE INDICATING A BAR AND |
| | TABLES FOR OCCUPANTS TO GATHER FOR SAMPLING OF THE RUM. |
| | PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 403.3 AND TABLE 403.3 TO FIND |
| | THE MOST SIMILAR OCCUPANCIES. UNDER WORK ROOMS THE |
| | FACTORY OR DISTILLERY AREA WOULD BE MOST SIMILAR TO |
| | MEAT PROCESSING- 51 PERSONS AT 15 CFM PER OCCUPANT= 765 |
| | CFMS. THE BAR AREA MUST BE SEPARATELY CALCULATED FROM |
| | THE SALES AREA (CALCULATED AT 15 PERSONS PER SQ. FT.) |
| | BECAUSE BARS ARE CALCULATED AT 100 PERSONS PER SQ. FT. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET P3: SECOND REQUEST FOR THE MECHANICAL PLAN FOR |
| | THE DISTILLERY. THE RESUBMITTED PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE |
| | THE STEAM PIPING FROM THE BOILER TO THE DISTILLERY |
| | TANKS. |
| | |
| | 4) IN RESPONSE TO COMMENT #S 6A & 6C, THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD IS STATING THAT NO DATA SHEETS ARE AVAILABLE FOR |
| | THE DISTILLERY TANKS AND THAT THE TANKS AND THE |
| | PROCESSING EQUIPMENT ARE USED AND BEING RELOCATED TO |
| | THE NEW FACILITY. PLEASE SEE SECTION 101.9.1 WPB |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC. USED MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | "THE USE OF USED MATERIALS WHICH MEET THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THIS CODE FOR NEW MATERIALS IS PERMITTED. USED |
| | EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES SHALL NOT BE REUSED UNLESS |
| | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL." |
| | |
| | THE DISTILLERY TANKS AND EQUIPMENT ARE NOT APPROVED AT |
| | THIS TIME WITHOUT FURTHER EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE GOVERNING TESTING AGENCY FOR DISTILLERY TANKS AND |
| | EQUIPMENT. DISTILLERY TANKS AND EQUIPMENT ARE NOT |
| | SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED IN THE MECHANICAL CODE, HOWEVER |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1003.1 FBC-14 MECHANICAL: |
| | |
| | "ALL PRESSURE VESSELS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE, SHALL BEAR THE |
| | LABEL OF AN APPROVED AGENCY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS." |
| | |
| | PRESSURE VESSEL DEFINITION - SCOPE |
| | |
| | THESE SCOPES ARE BASED ASME CODE SEC VIII DIV 1 |
| | THE VESSEL WITH MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WORKING |
| | PRESSURE(MAWP) HIGHER THAN 15 PSI |
| | INSIDE DIAMETER TO BE HIGHER THAN 152 MM |
| | NO PIPING OR PIPING COMPONENT |
| | NO ROTATING OR RECIPROCATING EQUIPMENT |
| | NOT WATER VESSEL UP TO 300PSI OR 210?F |
| | NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF OTHER SECTIONS |
| | ALSO FOR GAS FIRED DOUBLE SHELL HEAT EXCHANGERS < 50 |
| | PSI |
| | NOT STEAM BOILERS WITH DIRECT FIRING |
| | NOT FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY (PVHO) |
| | |
| | ADVISORY: PLEASE CONSULT WITH THE ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO |
| | TAX AND TRADE BUREAU (TTB) FOR DISTILLERY TESTING AND |
| | INSPECTION GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 5) THE SUBMITTED ENERGYGAUGE COMPLIANCE REPORT IS |
| | INDICATING AHU-1 TO HAVE A DESIGN EFFICIENCY RATING OF |
| | 12 EER, HOWEEVER THE EQUIPMEBNT SCHEDULE ON SHEET M-2 |
| | INDICATES 11.2 EER. |
| | |
| | 6) THE REQUESTED ENGINEERING FOR INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | CHILLER AS SHOWN ON SHEET S-15 IS INCOMPLETE. MISSING |
| | FROM THE DETAIL IS THE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA PER |
| | SECTION 1609 FBC-14 BUILDING, AND ALSO SPECIFICATIONS |
| | AND DETAILS FROM THE CHILLER MANUFACTURER. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT COMPLETE ENGINEERING MAY BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL |
| | IF NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | 1) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. |
| | FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS |
| | ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE |
| | NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE |
| | APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL |
| | OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST THE |
| | DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR |
| | REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN |
| | RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD |
| | THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION |
| | INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO |
| | THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL |
| | ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | 2) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE |
| | DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND |
| | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
