| Date |
Text |
| 2018-01-04 17:07:36 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1. SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT. PLAN COMPLIES AS A |
| | "SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT". HOWEVER, RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT THIS IS NOT A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT DUE |
| | TO REDUCTION OF SCOPE AND THAT A COST BREAKDOWN WOULD |
| | BE PROVIDED. THIS WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | THIS COMMENT MAY BE DISREGARDED IF APPLICANT DOES NOT |
| | OBJECT TO "SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT" DETERMINATION. |
| | |
| | 2-7. OK |
| | |
| | 8. FBC EB 301.1, THIS APPEARS TO BE A CHANGE OF |
| | OCCUPANCY (CH 10). A CURSORY LOOK INTO RECORDS FOR THIS |
| | BUILDING APPEAR TO REFLECT THAT CURRENT OCCUPANCY IS |
| | BUSINESS OR STORAGE. IF THIS IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY, |
| | REVISE PLAN TO NOTE THE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM |
| | CURRENT OCCUPANCY TO MIXED OCCUPANCY F1, M, AND |
| | POSSIBLE ANOTHER OCCUPANCY (TASTING/TOURS). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE STATES THAT THIS IS A CHANGE OF |
| | OCCUPANCY FROM BUSINESS TO F1, AND PLANS HAVE BEEN |
| | REVISED TO STATE SUCH, THEN RESPONSE MAKES SOME |
| | STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPLIANCE. I WAS UNABLE TO |
| | LOCATION THE INFORMATION WHICH STATES THAT THIS IS |
| | CURRENTLY BUSINESS, PROPOSED F1 WITH ACCESSORY |
| | MERCANTILE; IF THIS IS ON THE PLAN AS STATED, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE THE PAGE NUMBER AND THIS COMMENT WILL BE |
| | REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 9-13. OK |
| | |
| | 14. S4, A DASHED LINE (3') AT THE ENTRY DOOR IS SHOWN. |
| | CLARIFY WHAT THIS IS. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE AT ENTRY DOOR WHICH COMPLIES WITH FBC A 303.2 |
| | (SEE ALSO FBC A 202.3). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE NOTE SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN ACCESSIBLE |
| | ENTRY, PLEASE ADVISE. |
| | |
| | 15. PN25 MERCANTILE AREA, S4, ACCESSIBLE COUNTER SHOWN |
| | 30" DEPTH. PROVIDE A DETAIL OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC A 902.3. |
| | |
| | PN25 TASTING TOURS AREA, PROVIDE A DETAIL TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC A 902.3. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THE TWO COUNTERS LABELED PN25 HAVE BEEN |
| | RENUMBERED. RESPONSE LETTER DID NOT INDICATE WHERE |
| | DETAILS FOR THE COUNTERS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC |
| | A902.3 CAN BE FOUND. EITHER ADVISE, OR REQUEST A |
| | PROVISO: COMPLIANCE WITH FBC A902.3 REQUIRED, REVISION |
| | REQUIRED SUBJECT TO INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION. |
| | |
| | 16. PN25, PROVIDE A DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC |
| | A 227 (CHECK OUT AISLE). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THE TWO COUNTERS LABELED PN25 HAVE BEEN |
| | RENUMBERED. RESPONSE LETTER DID NOT INDICATE WHERE |
| | DETAILS FOR THE COUNTERS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC |
| | A902.3 CAN BE FOUND. EITHER ADVISE, OR REQUEST A |
| | PROVISO: COMPLIANCE WITH FBC A902.3 REQUIRED, REVISION |
| | REQUIRED SUBJECT TO INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION. |
| | |
| | 17. NO FIRE SPRINKLER INFORMATION PROVIDED. EITHER |
| | PROVIDE A PLAN OR INCORPORATE ALL REQUIREMENTS OF FBC B |
| | 404.6 EXCEPTION INTO THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE STATES: THE FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGN |
| | AND DRAWINGS ARE PROVIDED VIA SEPARATE PERMIT BY A |
| | SPECIALTY ENGINEER ..." |
| | |
| | SEE FIRE COMMENTS AND FBC 107.3.5.1.1(5). ALTHOUGH THE |
| | MEZZANINE EXCEPTION IS NOT LONGER APPLICABLE, FIRE |
| | SUPPRESSION INFORMATION TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE |
| | PLAN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. SEE FIRE COMMENTS; IT IS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE FIRE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMIT MAY |
| | BE SUBMITTED AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE. IF FIRE'S COMMENT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHAT IS REQUIRED WITH THIS BUILDING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CONTACT THE FIRE REVIEWER FOR |
| | CLARIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 18. OK |
| | |
| | 19. LS2, TRAVEL DISTANCE IS SHOWN AS 94' TO THE BASE OF |
| | THE STAIR. SEE FBC B 1016.3, EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASURED FROM THE MOST REMOTE POINT |
| | WITHIN A STORY ALONG THE NATURAL AND UNOBSTRUCTED PATH |
| | OF HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL EGRESS TRAVEL TO THE |
| | ENTRANCE TO AN EXIT. IT APPEARS THAT THE MEASUREMENT IS |
| | TO THE BASE OF THE STAIR, AT WHICH POINT OCCUPANT IS |
| | REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH THE FIRST FLOOR TO REACH AN |
| | EXIT, PLEASE REVISE OR CLARIFY. SEE ALSO FBC B 404.9 |
| | (<200' TRAVEL DISTANCE). |
| | |
| | 20. FBC 107, PALLET RACKS, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE |
| | HEIGHT LIMITATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS PREDICATED UPON THE |
| | TYPE(S) OF FIRE SPRINKLERS SPECIFIED AND IS TYPICALLY |
| | PROVIDED BY THE FIRE SPRINKLER SPECIALTY ENGINEER. |
| | REVIEW OF THIS ITEM WILL BE DONE WHEN FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FIRE IS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 21-22. OK |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 23. SEE FS 553.80(2)(B). DUE TO THE NUMEROUS COMMENTS |
| | FROM MULTIPLE TRADES, PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL APPLICANT |
| | (CONTRACTOR IS SUGGESTED) IS TO REVIEW COMMENTS AND |
| | PLANS, CONFIRM ALL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, AND |
| | SCHEDULE A PRE-RESUBMITTAL MEETING. |
| | |
| | 24. ADVISORY ONLY - PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS IS OPTIONAL AT THIS TIME. |
| | THIS MAY, UPON REQUEST, BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AND MAY |
| | BE SUBMITTED, NO FEE, TO BE REVIEWED PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO PROVIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AT THIS TIME, BUT A REVISION FEE WILL BE |
| | CHARGED IF THE PRODUCT IS CHANGED AFTER ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
