| Date |
Text |
| 2017-10-16 16:32:22 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION |
| | FBC CE = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 |
| | 5TH EDITION |
| | FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2014 5TH EDITION, |
| | PART VIII ELECTRICAL |
| | NEC = NFPA 70 2011 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| | FS = FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| | |
| | 1. PANEL M IS SHOWN AS A 600 AMP PANEL, BUT THE LOAD ON |
| | A PHASE IS 640.21 AMPS AND THE LOAD ON C PHASE IS 646 |
| | AMPS, WHICH EXCEEDS THE CAPACITY OF THE PANEL. PROVIDE |
| | CORRECTION. NEC 408.30 |
| | 2. LOAD CALCULATION FOR PANELS M, B, AND C NEED |
| | CORRECTION. THE RECEPTACLE LOAD STATES THAT THE FIRST |
| | 10K VA IS FIGURED AT 100%, BUT THE ACTUAL AMOUNT |
| | FIGURED AT 100% IS ONLY 5K VA. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC |
| | 220; FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 3. PANEL C LOAD CALCULATION IS LABELED AS "PANEL A LOAD |
| | CALCS". ADDITIONALLY, THE MATH IS WRONG FOR THE TOTALS |
| | ON A PHASE. BY MY ADDITION OF THE LOADS STATED, THE |
| | TOTAL LOAD ON THIS PHASE WOULD BE 136 AMPS, WHICH |
| | EXCEEDS THE RATING OF THE WIRE AND THE VALUE OF THE |
| | CIRCUIT BREAKER FEEDING THE PANEL. PROVIDE CORRECTION. |
| | NEC 220, 310.15(B)(16), 408.30, 215.2; FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 4. PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE INDICATING THE REQUIRED |
| | SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA SPECIFICATION SHEET |
| | SUBMITTALS WHERE APPLICABLE FOR LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS, |
| | FIRE ALARM, CCTV, PHONE AND DATA, WIRELESS SYSTEMS, |
| | WALK-IN COOLERS, HOODS, ETC. FBC 105.1, 107.2.1 |
| | 5. LIGHTING PLAN SHOWS ALL CIRCUITS FOR LIGHTING BEING |
| | FED FROM PANEL A, WHICH CONFLICTS WITH THE PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE FOR PANEL A. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 408.4; |
| | FBC 107.2.1 |
| | 6. PANEL M HAS THE CAPACITY TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM |
| | NUMBER OF DISCONNECTS PERMITTED FOR A SERVICE, WHICH IS |
| | 6. PROVIDE EITHER MAIN BREAKER FOR PANEL OR DISCONNECT |
| | AHEAD OF PANEL. NEC 230.71 |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | SINCERELY, |
| | |
| | JOHN PEARSON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6746 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
