| Date |
Text |
| 2017-10-13 17:17:11 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. OK |
| | |
| | 2. IF EXEMPT (FROM ACCESSIBILITY), PROVIDE INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING EXEMPTION. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT YOU SEND THE |
| | PROPOSED LANGUAGE TO ME VIA EMAIL PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. |
| | THE JUSTIFICATION FOR EXEMPTION MAY BE MADE EITHER BY |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL ON THE PLAN OR IN THE FORM OF A |
| | LETTER FROM THE CHURCH ON LETTERHEAD. CONTACT ME IF YOU |
| | WISH TO DISCUSS. |
| | |
| | PLAN WAS NOT REVISED TO INCLUDE INFORMATION. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER STATING THAT THE |
| | FACILITY IS NOT RENTED TO NON-RELIGIOUS ENTITIES. |
| | |
| | 3. PURPOSE OF THE "WORK ALCOVE" IS NOT CLEAR (SHEET |
| | A1.0 "NEW WORK NOTES"). "WORK AREAS" ARE GENERALLY |
| | EXEMPT, BUT THE NATURE OF THE "WORK AREAS" IS NOT |
| | CLEAR, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | THIS WAS ADDRESSED IN A RESPONSE LETTER, BUT PLAN WAS |
| | NOT REVISED. RESPONSE LETTERS ARE NOT RETAINED AS A |
| | PART OF THE PERMIT RECORD. THIS MAY ALSO BE DESCRIBED |
| | IN THE LETTER ADDRESSING ITEM #2. |
| | |
| | 4. OK |
| | |
| | 5. PLAN REFERS TO "REMOVED WINDOWS"; SHOULDN'T THIS BE |
| | "PROPOSED" WORK? FBC 107. |
| | |
| | NOT REVISED; SHALL I REDLINE THIS TO READ "REMOVE" |
| | WINDOWS RATHER THAN "REMOVED"? OR HAS THIS WORK BEEN |
| | DONE UNDER ANOTHER PERMIT? |
| | |
| | 6. FBC 107, FBC B CHAPTER 3, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
