| Date |
Text |
| 2017-10-11 10:47:25 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- ENGINEER TO REVISE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED: |
| | A) ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014) THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" |
| | NOT EXPOSURE "C". REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH APPROVED FLAT ROOF SYSTEM IS |
| | GOING TO BE INSTALLED. ROOFING CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED |
| | SYSTEM TYPE E(3) ON PAGE 14 OF 15 OF NOA 17-0222.09. |
| | ENGINEER DOESN'T DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC FLAT ROOF SYSTEM |
| | FROM NOA 17-0222.09 TO BE INSTALLED, BUT THE FASTENER |
| | SPACING ENGINEER IS SPECIFYING ON PAGE TWO OF THREE OF |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH THE FASTENER |
| | SPACING SHOWN ON THE SYSTEM SUBMITTED BY THE ROOFING |
| | CONTRACTOR. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE WITH ROOFING |
| | CONTRACTOR AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH SPECIFIC FLAT |
| | ROOF SYSTEM IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF THE SELECTED FLAT |
| | ROOF SYSTEM IS LESS THAN THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | FOR ROOF ZONE #1. THEREFORE, THIS FLAT ROOF SYSTEM CAN |
| | NOT BE USED. SEE SEC. 8.1 OF RAS 117. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY. |
| | |
| | D) PAGE 3 OF RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SHOW A FASTENER |
| | SPACING OF 3 INCHES FOR CORNER AREAS. THE MINIMUM |
| | FASTENER SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 4 INCHES |
| | O.C. AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 8.1 OF RAS 117. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
