| Date |
Text |
| 2018-07-11 11:44:16 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3) PARTIAL COMPLIANCE. EXPLAIN WHAT THE "INSIDE BITUMEN |
| | FOAM" MEANS ON SHEET A3.0. ON SHEET A3.0 THE ROOFING |
| | MATERIAL IS SPECIFIED AS ASPHALT TILE ROOF ON A 90# HOT |
| | MOPPED TO A 30# BASE SHEET. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | WILL ASPHALT SHINGLES OR CONCRETE ROOF TILE BE |
| | INSTALLED? HOT MOPPED 90# IS NOT USED AS AN |
| | UNDERLAYMENT FOR ASPHALT SHINGLES. |
| | |
| | 4) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5) PARTIAL COMPLIANCE. STILL NEED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THE SKYLIGHT AND THE ROOF COVERING MATERIAL. FBC |
| | 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| | PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5) THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA |
| | NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT ROOFING |
| | MATERIALS, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, STRUCTURAL MULLIONS, |
| | SKYLIGHTS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES. |
| | |
| | 6) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 10) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 11) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 12) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 13) ON SHEET A3.0, THE REVISED NOTES SPECIFY 10D NAILS |
| | FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING AND THE PREVIOUS NOTE SPECIFIES |
| | 8D RING SHANK NAILS. SPECIFY ONE OR THE OTHER. FBC |
| | 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 14) THE WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULE AND PRESSURES ON SHEET |
| | A4.0 HAVE NUMEROUS ERRORS. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN |
| | EXPOSURE "C" WITH A 170MPH VULT WINDSPEED. THE ROUGH |
| | OPENING SIZES FOR THE WINDOWS AND SLIDING GLASS DOOR |
| | ARE INCORRECT. THE ROUGH OPENINGS SHOULD BE LARGER THAN |
| | THE WINDOW AND DOOR SIZES. THE REQUIRED PRESSURES FOR |
| | THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR SHOULD BE +33.9, -42.8 PSF. THE |
| | SIZE OF THE DOOR IN THE SCHEDULE DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | ELEVATIONS. THE REQUIRED PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOWS |
| | SHOULD BE +37.9, -50.7 PSF FOR WALL ZONE 5 AND +37.9, |
| | -41.1 PSF FOR WALL ZONE 4. LOOK IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOAS FOR THE APPROVED DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOWS |
| | AND DOOR. THE OLD OUTDATED NOA NUMBERS WERE NOT REMOVED |
| | FROM THE SCHEDULES. |
| | |
| | |
