| Date |
Text |
| 2018-05-18 09:07:53 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3) ON SHEET A3.0 THE ROOFING MATERIAL IS SPECIFIED AS |
| | ASPHALT TILE ROOF ON A 90# HOT MOPPED TO A 30# BASE |
| | SHEET. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 WILL ASPHALT |
| | SHINGLES OR CONCRETE ROOF TILE BE INSTALLED? HOT MOPPED |
| | 90# IS NOT USED AS AN UNDERLAYMENT FOR ASPHALT |
| | SHINGLES. |
| | |
| | 4) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS THAT ARE SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE PLANS FOR THE WINDOWS IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET A4.0 |
| | AND THE TRUSS CONNECTORS ON SHEET S2.0 ARE EXPIRED. |
| | PLEASE REMOVE FROM PLANS OR UPDATE THEM. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5) THAT HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH |
| | FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS |
| | AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT |
| | ROOFING MATERIALS, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, STRUCTURAL |
| | MULLIONS, SKYLIGHTS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES. |
| | |
| | 6) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 10) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 11) THE VALUATION LISTED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION OF |
| | $12,000.00 IS LOW. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE VALUATION |
| | BASED ON FBC 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR |
| | PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS |
| | SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, |
| | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, |
| | RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, |
| | MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY |
| | LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST |
| | PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS |
| | SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUBMIT |
| | A COPY OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT FOR THIS PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 12) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 13) NEW COMMENT: A PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR A |
| | SR PRODUCTS BUILT-UP ROOF SYSTEM OVER RECOVER DECKS. |
| | THIS PRODUCT WILL NOT WORK FOR THIS PROJECT. THIS IS |
| | FOR A ROOF OVER OR A RECOVER. THE MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES ARE -45 PSF WHICH ARE TOO LOW AND LIMITATION |
| | #9 DOES NOT ALLOW THE PRESSURES TO BE INCREASED USING |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS OR EXTRAPOLATION |
| | |
